Australian Politics Forum

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #135 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:47pm Bobby, is this story going where I think it's going?
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 95268 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #136 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:52pm Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:47pm: Bobby, is this story going where I think it's going? What do you mean?
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #137 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:55pm Cardinal Pell. Prison balls. Nuns. A bottle of wine. What do you mean?
Back to top	IP Logged

Johnnie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #138 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

Back to top

IP Logged

Raven Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2981 Around	Re: Pell walks Reply #139 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 3:51am Two reasons to keep your kids home. Covid-19 an George Pell’s freedom
Back to top	Quoth the Raven "Nevermore" Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95268
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #140 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 6:25am

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:55pm:

Cardinal Pell. Prison balls. Nuns. A bottle of wine. What do you mean?

No - Pell would have enjoyed his freedom:

I bet those nuns put on a nice roast dinner tonight for Pell
and he washed it down with a few glasses of red wine.

Also - he survived in a jail for over a year where
the prisoners bash up kiddy fiddlers -
he did well.

Back to top

IP Logged

Captain Caveman Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6204 Gender:	Re: Pell walks Reply #141 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:54am Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:43pm: I thought that was the jury's job. Different rule$ for different fool$. For sure. Money money money.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26460
Australia

Re: Pell walks
Reply #142 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:57am

Bobby. wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 6:25am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 10:55pm:

Cardinal Pell. Prison balls. Nuns. A bottle of wine. What do you mean?

No - Pell would have enjoyed his freedom:

I bet those nuns put on a nice roast dinner tonight for Pell
and he washed it down with a few glasses of red wine.

Also - he survived in a jail for over a year where
the prisoners bash up kiddy fiddlers -
he did well.

apparently they clapped when he was released

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19623
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #143 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26460
Australia

Re: Pell walks
Reply #144 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19623
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #145 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:27am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

To accept Pell's innocence the court believed that there is never any alteration to procedures and Pell would not have been where it was claimed he was making the abuse impossible (just like all the other abuse they have denied)....The witness testimony was rejected on the word of an organisation which has a history of lying and covering up pedophilia in it's organisation....The witness was believed by the jury because he was the only one telling the truth....The judges looked for a loophole and found one by accepting the word of the ABUSERS!!!

Angry

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26460
Australia

Re: Pell walks
Reply #146 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:30am

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

To accept Pell's innocence the court believed that there is never any alteration to procedures and Pell would not have been where it was claimed he was making the abuse impossible (just like all the other abuse they have denied)....The witness testimony was rejected on the word of an organisation which has a history of lying and covering up pedophilia in it's organisation....The witness was believed by the jury because he was the only one telling the truth....The judges looked for a loophole and found one by accepting the word of the ABUSERS!!!

Angry

No. the court believed that there wasnt enough evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. the previous court had put the onus on him to prove he was not guilty. The proper way is for them to prove hes guilty.

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19623
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Pell walks
Reply #147 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:40am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:30am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

To accept Pell's innocence the court believed that there is never any alteration to procedures and Pell would not have been where it was claimed he was making the abuse impossible (just like all the other abuse they have denied)....The witness testimony was rejected on the word of an organisation which has a history of lying and covering up pedophilia in it's organisation....The witness was believed by the jury because he was the only one telling the truth....The judges looked for a loophole and found one by accepting the word of the ABUSERS!!!

Angry

No. the court believed that there wasnt enough evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. the previous court had put the onus on him to prove he was not guilty. The proper way is for them to prove hes guilty.

Spot

You are entitled to believe the pedophile enablers (who have a history of lying and covering up) if you wish mate....I believe the victim and those who have made similar accusations against Pell....The Judges found that Pell could not have broken from protocol and would not have had opportunity as supported by members of the Church....There is the word of one man against an institution founded on fear and persecution (High Court) as well as the lying Catholic Church???

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26460
Australia

Re: Pell walks
Reply #148 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:45am

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:30am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

To accept Pell's innocence the court believed that there is never any alteration to procedures and Pell would not have been where it was claimed he was making the abuse impossible (just like all the other abuse they have denied)....The witness testimony was rejected on the word of an organisation which has a history of lying and covering up pedophilia in it's organisation....The witness was believed by the jury because he was the only one telling the truth....The judges looked for a loophole and found one by accepting the word of the ABUSERS!!!

Angry

No. the court believed that there wasnt enough evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. the previous court had put the onus on him to prove he was not guilty. The proper way is for them to prove hes guilty.

Spot

You are entitled to believe the pedophile enablers (who have a history of lying and covering up) if you wish mate....I believe the victim and those who have made similar accusations against Pell....The Judges found that Pell could not have broken from protocol and would not have had opportunity as supported by members of the Church....There is the word of one man against an institution founded on fear and persecution (High Court) as well as the lying Catholic Church???

Roll Eyes

Where did i say i believed anyone? I just explained how the legal system works (or is supposed to work).

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Pell walks
Reply #149 - Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:51am

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:40am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:30am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 7:58am:

Johnnie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Their should be a law against one vindictive person being able throw another person behind bars on hearsay,, no evidence, no motive, no prior convictions, no nothing.

Now that Pell has been proven innocent it stands to reason the vindictive one has to be guilty of bullshitting in a court of law, now throw him in solitary confinement with no natural light given only bread and water for the rest of his natural life to teach him a lesson.

I would believe the victim before I ever took the word of a pedophile enabler like Pell....The credibility of the Church is in tatters and still there are those who believe this lying bunch of ass holes are the one's who have been unjustly treated....The Catholic Church has a history of protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent whilst hiding behind the cloak of secrecy to defend the Church at any cost....Lying untrustworthy and corrupt to the core!!!

Angry

thats all well and good except the legal system needs to not be corrupt.

Spot

To accept Pell's innocence the court believed that there is never any alteration to procedures and Pell would not have been where it was claimed he was making the abuse impossible (just like all the other abuse they have denied)....The witness testimony was rejected on the word of an organisation which has a history of lying and covering up pedophilia in it's organisation....The witness was believed by the jury because he was the only one telling the truth....The judges looked for a loophole and found one by accepting the word of the ABUSERS!!!

Angry

No. the court believed that there wasnt enough evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. the previous court had put the onus on him to prove he was not guilty. The proper way is for them to prove hes guilty.

Spot

You are entitled to believe the pedophile enablers (who have a history of lying and covering up) if you wish mate....I believe the victim and those who have made similar accusations against Pell....The Judges found that Pell could not have broken from protocol and would not have had opportunity as supported by members of the Church....There is the word of one man against an institution founded on fear and persecution (High Court) as well as the lying Catholic Church???

Roll Eyes

you are condemning him for the failure of the CHURCH in other words the Vatican......you cannot bring the church into a case where he is charged with sexual abuse....he happened to be an Arch Bishop....

the trial was about him and a boy and what happened...did it in fact happen the way the boy remembered .. the High Court said the evidence produced didnt prove it did....

their judgement was not based on the Church or its rulings..

that isnt the way the LAW works....

if you were charged with a break and enter yet when you went to trial they brought up all the break and enters your brother had done

would that be a fair trial??..

Back to top

IP Logged