Australian Politics Forum - UN vote to ban criticism

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Thinking Globally › UN vote to ban criticism

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

UN vote to ban criticism (Read 2405 times)

issuevoter Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9200 The Great State of Mind Gender:	Re: UN vote to ban criticism Reply #30 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:22pm If a country is legally obliged to accept refugee citizens of a second country. The first country has the moral, if not legal, right to intervene in the second country, overthrow the government, correct its laws, and send the "refugees" back home.
Back to top	No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion. IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 8659 armidale Gender:	Re: UN vote to ban criticism Reply #31 - Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:48pm But Aboriginals don't have enough weapons.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80333
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: UN vote to ban criticism
Reply #32 - Apr 9^th, 2020 at 8:24pm

chimera wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:48pm:

But Aboriginals don't have enough weapons.

Also they can't plan well enough... or stick together as a group long enough to make a difference.. they spend more time bashing and killing one another than they do attacking those they claim are their mortal enemies.

Petty tribalism just doesn't cut the mustard, as the Middle East shows clearly... may Allah visit the Covid upon them all and upon their houses....

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80333
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: UN vote to ban criticism
Reply #33 - Apr 9^th, 2020 at 8:27pm

issuevoter wrote on Apr 7^th, 2020 at 12:22pm:

If a country is legally obliged to accept refugee citizens of a second country. The first country has the moral, if not legal, right to intervene in the second country, overthrow the government, correct its laws, and send the "refugees" back home.

Unfortunately not so - the principle of national sovereignty rules, and short of a declaration of war, all that can be done about nastiness in another country is protest, set in place sanctions, and take in refugees afflicted by the evil in that land.

If a clear case can be made that a majority of the people in such a nation are fighting for 'freedom' (a malleable concept at best), there is the possibility of intervention.... but I've told yez about intervention and the flow-on effects from it many times.

When I was a young man and first read Barnet's Intervention and Revolution, a lot of it went over my head - as I've grown into my nose, it all becomes crystal clear. Now it is one of my favourite reference books.

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 8659 armidale Gender:	Re: UN vote to ban criticism Reply #34 - Apr 9^th, 2020 at 8:44pm Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Apr 9^th, 2020 at 8:27pm: [ Unfortunately not so - the principle of national sovereignty rules. You must be a violin player . And grow roses.
Back to top	IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: UN vote to ban criticism
Reply #35 - Apr 13^th, 2020 at 8:37am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 7^th, 2020 at 10:46pm:

Quote:

............ U.N. Global Migration Pact would make a criminal offense for citizens and media outlets to criticize mass immigration.
Please watch and share this video.
This is dire warning for the future of Europe, America, and Australia.
Just recently Australia joined a growing number of countries that have decided not to sign the UN migration pact including the United States, Israel, Hungary, Croatia, Poland and Austria.
The UN is losing its ability to force Western countries to accept millions of refugees and migrants from all over the Middle East, Asia and Africa and provide them with free housing, food, money, health insurance and welfare benefits. ................

http://www.freepressfront.com/2018/12/un-votes-to-make-it-criminal-offense-to.ht...

The UN has outlived its original purpose especially now that it is run by the oligarchy who pass their laws into every nation on Earth under the guise of the UN.

Time for the UN to be no more.

Lets get rid of it.

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

chimera

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 8659
armidale
Gender: male

Re: UN vote to ban criticism
Reply #36 - Apr 13^th, 2020 at 9:16am

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
On 26 June 1945, Australia was one of 50 nations which signed the United Nations Charter at a conference in San Francisco, USA.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page