Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human (Read 8968 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39533
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #75 - Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 40524
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #76 - Mar 11th, 2020 at 8:09pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:25pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 4:05pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 12:48am:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10th, 2020 at 1:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 9th, 2020 at 11:37pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 5:30pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 4:49pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 12:12pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:43am:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:27am:
Frank wrote on Mar 5th, 2020 at 5:14pm:
"Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human "

I think the feeling is mutual.



Quite so. Untermenschen, innit.



The muslims use the term kuffar or dhimmi.



You use the term "inferior culture". FD uses the term "Arab/Negroid sub-species".

Each to their own, I guess.



And you don't  see the difference between culture and species, Paki?

You can convert/adapt to culture. Can't  to race or species.


"Race" as you are using the term, Soren is non-existant.  There is no major genetic diference between the various "races".  They can all interbreed.  That means Genetically the concept of "race" is nonsensical.  It is basically a cultural construct.  It doesn't exist Genetically.  The way you use the term is nonsense. Soren.  It has no basis in science.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I am sure that the social concerns about racial background would come into play if a person of one race impregnated someone of another race. One group being concerned that their racial background is being taken away by another.


Only if they are Racist in outlook.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I thought you said "race does not exist". How can one be racist if race does not exist. You have defeated your own argument.


No, I am acknowledging that some people still think in Racist ideas.  As far as I am most modern people believe, Genetics has killed Racism stone, cold, dead.  Roll Eyes



A Chinaman is a Chinaman, an African negro is an African negro. Charlize Theron is African but not a negro. We all see it. A white person is not an Indian, an Arab is not a Japanese.  You can SEE it, Bwian. We ALL see it.  You are banging on about something completely irrelevant. People are not genetic entities and human encounters are not genetic encounters. We DO SEE AND EXPERIENCE racial differences.  Black lives matters - lecture THEM on their 'idiocy' of believing in wace. 

Nobody could invent stupid like you are, Bwian. You are a freak of nature, well beyond any imaginative invention of the Ur-stupid.  You stand alone.


Genetics agrees with me, Soren.  It disagrees with you.  You, like most Racists, are focusing exclusively on the minor superficial differences.  Genetics looks at the big picture.  You look at the tiny things, which suits your tiny mind.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


So you can't  tell an african from a chinaman from an irishman, Bwian?  Really?


You are infected with the stupidvirus.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39533
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #77 - Mar 11th, 2020 at 10:04pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 8:09pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:25pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 4:05pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 12:48am:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10th, 2020 at 1:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 9th, 2020 at 11:37pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 5:30pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 4:49pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 12:12pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:43am:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:27am:
Frank wrote on Mar 5th, 2020 at 5:14pm:
"Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human "

I think the feeling is mutual.



Quite so. Untermenschen, innit.



The muslims use the term kuffar or dhimmi.



You use the term "inferior culture". FD uses the term "Arab/Negroid sub-species".

Each to their own, I guess.



And you don't  see the difference between culture and species, Paki?

You can convert/adapt to culture. Can't  to race or species.


"Race" as you are using the term, Soren is non-existant.  There is no major genetic diference between the various "races".  They can all interbreed.  That means Genetically the concept of "race" is nonsensical.  It is basically a cultural construct.  It doesn't exist Genetically.  The way you use the term is nonsense. Soren.  It has no basis in science.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I am sure that the social concerns about racial background would come into play if a person of one race impregnated someone of another race. One group being concerned that their racial background is being taken away by another.


Only if they are Racist in outlook.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I thought you said "race does not exist". How can one be racist if race does not exist. You have defeated your own argument.


No, I am acknowledging that some people still think in Racist ideas.  As far as I am most modern people believe, Genetics has killed Racism stone, cold, dead.  Roll Eyes



A Chinaman is a Chinaman, an African negro is an African negro. Charlize Theron is African but not a negro. We all see it. A white person is not an Indian, an Arab is not a Japanese.  You can SEE it, Bwian. We ALL see it.  You are banging on about something completely irrelevant. People are not genetic entities and human encounters are not genetic encounters. We DO SEE AND EXPERIENCE racial differences.  Black lives matters - lecture THEM on their 'idiocy' of believing in wace. 

Nobody could invent stupid like you are, Bwian. You are a freak of nature, well beyond any imaginative invention of the Ur-stupid.  You stand alone.


Genetics agrees with me, Soren.  It disagrees with you.  You, like most Racists, are focusing exclusively on the minor superficial differences.  Genetics looks at the big picture.  You look at the tiny things, which suits your tiny mind.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


So you can't  tell an african from a chinaman from an irishman, Bwian?  Really?


By looking at the minor, superficial, evolutionary changes to melanin and the shape of their yes, yes I can, Soren.  None of them however affect their intelligence nor their culture as you like to procliam.  Genetically they are basically identical, it is what allows them to interbreed.  They all belong to the only race that matters, the human one.  Roll Eyes

Quote:
You are infected with the stupidvirus.


Still not gettin' a good on all that muck you're spreading there, aye, Soren?  Looks like you need another load on your spuds.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10306
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #78 - Mar 11th, 2020 at 10:35pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   
Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.
   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Link?
Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39533
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #79 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 12:12pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 10:35pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   
Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.
   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Link?


Do your own research, Bias.  That is, if you're capable of it.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47367
At my desk.
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #80 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:53pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Inadequacy has never stopped Muslims trying.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39533
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #81 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:55pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:53pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Inadequacy has never stopped Muslims trying.


Really?  And I thought you believed trying at a task was a good story, FD.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47367
At my desk.
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #82 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:56pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:25pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 4:05pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 12:48am:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10th, 2020 at 1:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 9th, 2020 at 11:37pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 5:30pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 4:49pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 12:12pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:43am:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:27am:
Frank wrote on Mar 5th, 2020 at 5:14pm:
"Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human "

I think the feeling is mutual.



Quite so. Untermenschen, innit.



The muslims use the term kuffar or dhimmi.



You use the term "inferior culture". FD uses the term "Arab/Negroid sub-species".

Each to their own, I guess.



And you don't  see the difference between culture and species, Paki?

You can convert/adapt to culture. Can't  to race or species.


"Race" as you are using the term, Soren is non-existant.  There is no major genetic diference between the various "races".  They can all interbreed.  That means Genetically the concept of "race" is nonsensical.  It is basically a cultural construct.  It doesn't exist Genetically.  The way you use the term is nonsense. Soren.  It has no basis in science.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I am sure that the social concerns about racial background would come into play if a person of one race impregnated someone of another race. One group being concerned that their racial background is being taken away by another.


Only if they are Racist in outlook.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I thought you said "race does not exist". How can one be racist if race does not exist. You have defeated your own argument.


No, I am acknowledging that some people still think in Racist ideas.  As far as I am most modern people believe, Genetics has killed Racism stone, cold, dead.  Roll Eyes



A Chinaman is a Chinaman, an African negro is an African negro. Charlize Theron is African but not a negro. We all see it. A white person is not an Indian, an Arab is not a Japanese.  You can SEE it, Bwian. We ALL see it.  You are banging on about something completely irrelevant. People are not genetic entities and human encounters are not genetic encounters. We DO SEE AND EXPERIENCE racial differences.  Black lives matters - lecture THEM on their 'idiocy' of believing in wace. 

Nobody could invent stupid like you are, Bwian. You are a freak of nature, well beyond any imaginative invention of the Ur-stupid.  You stand alone.


Genetics agrees with me, Soren.  It disagrees with you.  You, like most Racists, are focusing exclusively on the minor superficial differences.  Genetics looks at the big picture.  You look at the tiny things, which suits your tiny mind.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you claiming that the visible differences between races has no genetic basis?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47367
At my desk.
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #83 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:58pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:53pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Inadequacy has never stopped Muslims trying.


Really?  And I thought you believed trying at a task was a good story, FD.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Not if you are trying to be backwards Brian. I wouldn't expect you to understand the subtleties.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39533
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #84 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 4:02pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:58pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:55pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:53pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Inadequacy has never stopped Muslims trying.


Really?  And I thought you believed trying at a task was a good story, FD.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Not if you are trying to be backwards Brian. I wouldn't expect you to understand the subtleties.


So, it isn't the effort but the objective, right, FD?

Gee, all those Christians are in big, big trouble then...  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92285
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #85 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 4:42pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:56pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:25pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 6:46pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 4:05pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 12:48am:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10th, 2020 at 1:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 9th, 2020 at 11:37pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 5:30pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 4:49pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 12:12pm:
Frank wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:43am:
Mattyfisk wrote on Mar 7th, 2020 at 9:27am:
Frank wrote on Mar 5th, 2020 at 5:14pm:
"Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human "

I think the feeling is mutual.



Quite so. Untermenschen, innit.



The muslims use the term kuffar or dhimmi.



You use the term "inferior culture". FD uses the term "Arab/Negroid sub-species".

Each to their own, I guess.



And you don't  see the difference between culture and species, Paki?

You can convert/adapt to culture. Can't  to race or species.


"Race" as you are using the term, Soren is non-existant.  There is no major genetic diference between the various "races".  They can all interbreed.  That means Genetically the concept of "race" is nonsensical.  It is basically a cultural construct.  It doesn't exist Genetically.  The way you use the term is nonsense. Soren.  It has no basis in science.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I am sure that the social concerns about racial background would come into play if a person of one race impregnated someone of another race. One group being concerned that their racial background is being taken away by another.


Only if they are Racist in outlook.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


I thought you said "race does not exist". How can one be racist if race does not exist. You have defeated your own argument.


No, I am acknowledging that some people still think in Racist ideas.  As far as I am most modern people believe, Genetics has killed Racism stone, cold, dead.  Roll Eyes



A Chinaman is a Chinaman, an African negro is an African negro. Charlize Theron is African but not a negro. We all see it. A white person is not an Indian, an Arab is not a Japanese.  You can SEE it, Bwian. We ALL see it.  You are banging on about something completely irrelevant. People are not genetic entities and human encounters are not genetic encounters. We DO SEE AND EXPERIENCE racial differences.  Black lives matters - lecture THEM on their 'idiocy' of believing in wace. 

Nobody could invent stupid like you are, Bwian. You are a freak of nature, well beyond any imaginative invention of the Ur-stupid.  You stand alone.


Genetics agrees with me, Soren.  It disagrees with you.  You, like most Racists, are focusing exclusively on the minor superficial differences.  Genetics looks at the big picture.  You look at the tiny things, which suits your tiny mind.  Tsk, tsk.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you claiming that the visible differences between races has no genetic basis?


Would you like FD to draw you a Venn diagram?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92285
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #86 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 4:45pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 1:53pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Inadequacy has never stopped Muslims trying.


Yes, but that's because they're genetically inferior.

You're not racist, FD. Inferior sub-species are not a race.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #87 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 5:33pm
 
Would genetic inferiority make men sit down to pee then play with their dicks afterwards?

Would genetic inferiority make men revere a practicing pedophile and mass murderer as the best example for mankind?

Would genetic inferiority make men believe that there is a god who wants' you to slaughter all innocent people who don't worship their satanic god?

Would genetic inferiority make men believe that having sex with an infant was perfectly O.K., because the pedophile prophet used to do it?

Would genetic inferiority make men believe that if they are suicide jihadists who die killing innocent children, they will definitely enter a paradise which is actually a brothel, filled with hour'is with big tits and little boys scattered like pearls around the brothel?

Would genetic inferiority make you believe that if you murder as many innocent people as possible, while yelling adulation for said satanic god, you will enter the paradise brothel?

Would genetic inferiority make you believe you have the right to slaughter innocent people for insulting the pedophile prophet, the evil cult or the depraved *holy book*?

Would genetic inferiority make you believe that forced child marriage was legitimate because the pedophile prophet married and had sex with a child?

Would genetic inferiority make you believe that your satanic god wanted you to behead innocent people?

Would genetic inferiority make you globally become the worlds  greatest terrorist threat?

Would genetic inferiority make you become a global refugee problem?

Would genetic inferiority make you slaughter your own kids by the 100's of 1000's with famine war and refugee trauma?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92285
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #88 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 5:47pm
 
All that and more, Moses. They have to be. They're genetically retarded inbreds who squat down to pee and play with their dicks afterwards, remember.

But no, they're not a race, dear.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10306
Gender: male
Re: Moslems regard those who reject ISLAM = sub-human
Reply #89 - Mar 12th, 2020 at 6:47pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 12th, 2020 at 12:12pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 10:35pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:30pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 11th, 2020 at 7:18pm:


Perhaps we should examine Rabbinical and Biblical law a little more closely?  Mmmm, loads of bad stuff there.   The point is, no nation, apart from the Vatican bases its laws on Biblical law and no nation, not even Israel bases it's laws on Rabbinical law.   Few countries actually base their legal systems on Sh'ria law because it is totally inadequate at descibing modern telecommunications, transport or social orders.   
Countries may claim to have a Sh'ria legal system but invariably they actually based n British colonial legal system in the end.
   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Link?


Do your own research, Bias.  That is, if you're capable of it.  Roll Eyes



You're having yourself on. Muslims got together and worked out their own legal system and it conflicted with British colonial law - who would have thought?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatawa_%27Alamgiri


Your turn to supply a link
Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print