Richdude wrote on Jan 25
th, 2020 at 1:53pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Jan 22
nd, 2020 at 7:38am:
Peter Schweitzer is a paid propagandist for the Mercers, dear:
Quote:The Government Accountability Institute (GAI) is a conservative nonprofit think-tank[3] located in Tallahassee, Florida.[4][5] GAI was founded in 2012[6] by Peter Schweizer and Steve Bannon with funding from Robert Mercer and family.[7] Schweizer serves as the group's president.[8] The group is known for pushing conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton in 2016, as well as conspiracy theories about Joe Biden before the 2020 election.[9]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_InstituteHere's what Schweitzer said about
that book:
Quote:Schweizer admitted he overreached in attacking Hillary Clinton's purported role in approving a Russian uranium deal and falsely claimed that then-Secretary of State Clinton "had veto power" to stop the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Agency (Rosatom) from purchasing Uranium One. During a May 5, 2015, Politico podcast interview, Schweizer admitted that "veto is probably not the best word" and "what I meant by veto power was as we explain the process, you know, if somebody objects it kicks in the special investigation."[41] In a 2015 NBC interview Schweizer said that Hillary Clinton did not support a nuclear deal with India in 2006 and that she voted for it in 2008, after donations to the Clinton Foundation. PolitiFact rated Schweizer's claim "False".[42]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schweizer Schweitzer has done his homework - again!
His previous book "Clinton Cash", exposed the fake Clinton Foundations that were laundering billions for Hillary's influence.
This new book probably is also true. Why do I know that? Because as with his previous book, Schweitzer has not been sued. You have to be very sure of the facts before you tackle people as powerful as he does.
Schweitzer recanted his case on Clinton Cash, dear. Read the above.
Better yet, read the views of Steve Bannon, who said he used Schweitzer's book to legitimate the fake news he published on Breitbart.
Both, of course, are funded by the Mercers - billionaire backers far more influential than Soros has ever been.
When Soros creates an "Open Society Foundation", he does so to promote apolitical interests, such as independent media and a free press. Soros, after all, grew up in a communist country, a completely "closed" society. He knows what it's like.
When the Mercers create a "Government Accountability Institute", they do so simply as a political vehicle to keep Republicans in power. By "government accountability", they really mean a one-party state, ruled by Republicans they can influence.
They paid for Clinton Cash to be written simply to keep a Democrat out of office. The falsehoods in that book are clear, but if Schweitzer hasn't been sued, I'd say it's because his book didn't include many facts at all, just questions.
Those questions are designed to produce the sort of answers you make up, dear. You know, the ones we regularly prove false.