polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 24
th, 2020 at 2:29pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 7
th, 2020 at 3:33pm:
Quote:Nevermind FD - perhaps if Muhammad was intervening to end slavery all would be forgiven.
He was murdering innocent people to line his own pockets, and built a religion around it to justify it that has plagued humanity with similar acts ever since - including slavery, right up till today and no doubt into the future.
So when western countries marched into muslim countries and ended slavery - do you think the purpose of the intervention was to end slavery, or to "line their own pockets"?
Take some time on that.
Oh, I remember now. FD said Whitey ended the Arab slave trade during one of the crusades - long before Paine and Wilberforce and all those 19th Century Whigs.
FD, of course, forgets all about Whitey starting his slave trade up on an industrial scale in the New World a few centuries later.
FD's argument, however, is most peculiar. He puts his Medieval abolitionism down to the influence of Christianity.
Yes, a religion who's prophet advised, "slaves, be good to your masters"; a religion that justified the use of slaves since the Old Testament; a religion started by the
Romans of all people.
FD avoids all discussion of the influence of utilitarianism, liberalism and the secular movements of the 18th and 19th Centuries. He stands his ground on a sentence he read once in
Guns, Germs and Steel.That was pre-2007, of course. FD hasn't had much time for books since he "changed his mind".
It's strange how all those books he read before 2007 got twisted out of all proportion in the newly minted, mind-changed FD.
It's almost as if he squeezed the juices out of all that knowledge, left it in the sun and ground up the sediments to form a powder that he uses to spike people's drinks with, no?