Always have been - you just missed it...
" a government that subordinates the individual to the state and strictly controls all aspects of life by coercive measures"When has that never been the case here? When have the legal and civil rights of the ordinary person ever been upheld here? Started to get even worse when Keating held a gun to the head of the states and demanded that they introduce' uniform domestic violence laws' - 'laws' that directly abrogated legal and civil rights and contravened the Rule of Law.... and still do on an escalating scale... 'laws' by which 'government' declared war on men in this nation, and then wondered why there was a reaction .....
The beauty of it was that they could pick them off one at a time.... but that could only last until enough had been viciously violated and raped of their legal rights - then the retaliation began - and will continue until these stupid non-laws are withdrawn and replaced by legal and common sense and genuine equal treatment as required under law.
Then these non-laws were reinforced in the Family court with its stupid and politically directed decisions to favour one over another. Then there is Affirmative Action....
If ever there was a sign of totalitarianism, including the introduction of illegal laws into jurisprudence - that is and was one.
Do you think a genuine government of the people would ever have been allowed to get away with this clear violence against law and against civil rights and equal treatment? Why do you imagine so very many despise government these days, including some who cynically enter it for self-advancement and just play the game for the benefits? Why is there increasing unrest in the community - once that community began to realise that emasculating the nation meant there was zero opposition to any government in its clear pursuit of reduction of the populace under poverty? Why are more women being killed and there is no reduction in sight? Why do idiots who claim to be seeking a solution to this 'crisis' want to simply increase the pressure on men in some absurd hope that doing so will bash those men into submission instead of retaliation?
Now what kind of moron would even consider such a stupid policy assault on 50% of the populace, and think he/she could get away with it?