cods wrote on Nov 17
th, 2019 at 7:05am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 17
th, 2019 at 6:58am:
So what is the problem?
Spot
well you are happy someone of this character can abuse a system made possible by LABOR......where he is now ensconced in this country and could come and live next door to you sounds like a man any laborite would love to live near.
You must be tolerant [of everything and of everyone whom LEFTISTS are tolerant of] cods, and not discriminatory.
Its the law, in Australia, in 2019.
In 2019, Australians are not allowed to 'discriminate' [i.e. to choose, if our choice offends LEFTISTS].
'Australia', does not exist anymore cods.Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1475535134/0#0 Quote:The character of the people of a nation, define the popular [perceived] character of that nation.
Isn't that correct ?
IMO, Australia does not exist anymore.Yes, something which is referred to as 'Australia' exists.
But it is not Australia anymore. .
Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1561806794/7#7 Quote:
I would venture to suggest, that every nation aspires to achieve a political 'environment', which will [within its own borders] facilitate political stability, peace, and prosperity for its citizens.
Few come close.
aspire = = direct one’s hopes or ambitions towards achieving something.
Any nation which has achieved a modicum of political stability, peace, and prosperity,
which then, chooses [in a dangerous world, full of LAWLESS individuals] to [in effect] open its borders, will soon;
1/ lose its current national identity,
and,
2/ lose the political stability and the peace which facilitates its national prosperity.
.
Nations like Australia, and the U.S.A. are, imo, morphing into sh it hole nations.
PROPOSITION;
It is the character of the people of any nation, which defines the character [and quality, and the reputation] of that nation.
Logically, sh it hole nations, are so, because of the particular character and cultural mores, of the people who inhabit those sh it hole nations.
And the same principle applies, with the particular character and cultural mores, of the people who inhabit nations where there is political stability, peace, and prosperity.
Again, ....it is the character of the people of a nation, which defines the character [and quality, and the reputation] of a nation.
Recognising and valuing [i.e. appreciating] that difference [between different things and different people], is called 'discrimination'.
Dictionary;
discrimination = =
1 the action of discriminating against people.
2 recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another. good judgement or taste.
Dictionary;
discriminating = = having or showing good taste or judgement.
.
Yadda said somewhere.....
Quote:
"We are all the same. And there is no difference between us.", is the mantra that the humanists keep repeating.
But don't believe it!
Because it is our personal value systems [that have formed within us, from childhood until adulthood], which define who we are, as individuals.
And it is the - individual - which helps to define [the nature and the character of] his immediate 'environment' [i.e. the nature and the character of his community], and it is the collection of [those] communities [within a nation] that define the nature and character of a nation.
Forum
Pages: 1
Is this abuse of MEDIVAC (Read 1210 times)
