Quote:The answer to both questions is China's top-down decision to implement capitalist practices WITHOUT democracy.
How does that, rather than the ability of party members to vote in changes without massive bloodshed, explain their ability to achieve "seismic purges" without massive bloodshed? Are you suggesting capitalism prevents violence?
Also, the CPC's internal democracy came prior to the transition to capitalism. The transition would not have been possible without it. So not only does your answer not make sense, it rests on a refusal to acknowledge reality.
Quote:That is one of the central lessons of the early 21st century.
You never got round to explaining what the lesson is. Is the lesson nothing more than a bunch of stuff that happened? That we must hide the wood with lots of trees?
Quote:Democracy is one thing, free trade is another. Technological innovation and improved human conditions is another thing too. The Chinese have been able to improve their living standards without democracy or a free economy, just as the Soviets once did under Stalin.
So you are literally using Russia to disprove the link between democracy, capitalism and wealth? Do you realise how stupid that looks?
Are you still denying that the Chinese communist party is internally democratic? And adding to that a denial that they are transitioning to capitalism?
When does reality ever creep in to your world view?
The CPC's transition to capitalism was preceded by the Cultural Revolution, dear.
If you're trying to win an argument by referring to the internal structure of the Chinese Communist Party, you've missed the entire point of democracy.
parties.