"A copy of the California lawsuit (filed on 26 April 2016) shared via the Scribd web site outlined the allegations, which included the accusation that Trump and Epstein had (over 20 years earlier) “sexually and physically” abused the then 13-year-old plaintiff and forced her “to engage in various perverted and depraved sex acts” — including being “forced to manually stimulate Defendant Trump with the use of her hand upon Defendant Trump’s erect penis until he reached sexual orgasm,” and being “forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe, age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump” — after luring her to a “series of underage sex parties” by promising her “money and a modeling career”:"

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 11:49am:


A copy of the California lawsuit (filed on 26 April 2016) shared via the Scribd web site outlined the allegations, which included the accusation that Trump and Epstein had (over 20 years earlier) “sexually and physically” abused the then 13-year-old plaintiff and forced her “to engage in various perverted and depraved sex acts” — including being “forced to manually stimulate Defendant Trump with the use of her hand upon Defendant Trump’s erect penis until he reached sexual orgasm,” and being “forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe, age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump” — after luring her to a “series of underage sex parties” by promising her “money and a modeling career”:

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 11:49am:


But what laws did she break?

No, dear, not 6000. A little closer to 600:

Quote:
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/18/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails...

91 security violations (among 38 staff) is only 509 short of 600. Close enough, no?

Year 9 maths, innit.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 12:40pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 12:22pm:


Laws? What's that got to do with anything?

SerialBrain9 wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 12:56pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 12:22pm:


Not one.  The violations referred to concerned 'security protocols.'

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 1:56pm:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371

U.S. Code § 371.Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-47

U.S. Code CHAPTER 47—FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS

prev | next
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally
§ 1002. Possession of false papers to defraud United States
§ 1003. Demands against the United States
§ 1004. Certification of checks
§ 1005. Bank entries, reports and transactions
§ 1006. Federal credit institution entries, reports and transactions
§ 1007.Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation transactions
[§§ 1008, 1009. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §§ 961(g)(1), 962(a)(3), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500, 502]
§ 1010.Department of Housing and Urban Development and Federal Housing Administration transactions
§ 1011. Federal land bank mortgage transactions
§ 1012.Department of Housing and Urban Development transactions
§ 1013. Farm loan bonds and credit bank debentures
§ 1014. Loan and credit applications generally; renewals and discounts; crop insurance
§ 1015. Naturalization, citizenship or alien registry
§ 1016. Acknowledgment of appearance or oath
§ 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed
§ 1018. Official certificates or writings
§ 1019. Certificates by consular officers
§ 1020. Highway projects
§ 1021. Title records
§ 1022. Delivery of certificate, voucher, receipt for military or naval property
§ 1023. Insufficient delivery of money or property for military or naval service
§ 1024. Purchase or receipt of military, naval, or veteran’s facilities property
§ 1025. False pretenses on high seas and other waters
§ 1026. Compromise, adjustment, or cancellation of farm indebtedness
§ 1027. False statements and concealment of facts in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
§ 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
§ 1028A. Aggravated identity theft
§ 1029. Fraud and related activity in connection with access devices
§ 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
§ 1031. Major fraud against the United States
§ 1032. Concealment of assets from conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent
§ 1033. Crimes by or affecting persons engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate commerce
§ 1034. Civil penalties and injunctions for violations of section 1033
§ 1035. False statements relating to health care matters
§ 1036. Entry by false pretenses to any real property, vessel, or aircraft of the United States or secure area of any airport or seaport
§ 1037. Fraud and related activity in connection with electronic mail
§ 1038. False information and hoaxes
§ 1039. Fraud and related activity in connection with obtaining confidential phone records information of a covered entity
§ 1040. Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits

Bobby. wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 2:15pm:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

U.S. Code § 793.Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(a)Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 1:53pm:


You expect morons who spend all day calling other forum members pedophiles to know the difference?

Good luck with that.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

U.S. Code § 793.Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(a)Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 3:36pm:



oh dear whats that ?

allegations are NOT factual unless PROVEN in a court of law ..

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 3:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 3:46pm:


yes its going to court ,

enter Barr and Durnham

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 3:49pm:


Official Court Documents:

All Documents in the Doe v. Trump Lawsuits

Oh dear   

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:33pm:

Panther wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:13pm:


It's either that or go to the press and have Michael Cohen buy your silence with a few hundred grand of political donations.

I know which one I'd be doing, dear.

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:37pm:


No, dear one, not inscrutable memes.

Anyone else?

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:48pm:

Why did Hillary Clinton need a private server? Anyone know why?

4 minutes . when this was posted , H.A. Goodman was a Bernie Supporter a REGULAR CNN Guest .

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:50pm:


Good question, dear one. Why is Mr Trump's lawyer currently in jail?

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:53pm:


not for anything Trump did beloved  ..

are you responsible for your Lawyer or accountants actions  ?

Dnarever wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:55pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:56pm:


Not so clear cut when said Lawyer is doing his employers bidding - favours - making payments on behalf or that were financed by the employer.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:58pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:58pm:


the 5th ..

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:58pm:


Yes, dear one, I said is that his bedroom?

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 4:53pm:


Yet Hillarys predecessor Colin Powell also circumvented official email by using a computer and his personal email account.

None of Powell's email were recovered because his account had been closed by the time it was known.

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 3:32pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 21^st, 2019 at 5:06pm:


Dear one? You appear to have disintegrated.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/new-benghazi-docs-confirm-hillary-clint...

New Benghazi Docs Confirm Hillary Clinton Email Cover-Up

by Cristina Laila October 21, 2019 155 Comments



Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch released new Hillary Clinton emails on the 2012 Benghazi attack and cover-up that have been hidden for years and would have exposed the fact that Hillary had a private server when the State Department discovered her private email back in 2014.

Recall, it was Judicial Watch who blew the story wide open about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server back in 2015 through a FOIA lawsuit.


The hidden Clinton email shows Hillary’s aides going into overdrive and dispersing talking points in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit seeking records.

The long withheld email, clearly responsive to Judicial Watch’s lawsuit seeking records concerning “talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack,” contains Clinton’s private email address and a conversation about the YouTube video that sparked the Benghazi talking points scandal (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.

Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuits led to court-ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request.

Shortly after the Benghazi terror attack that left 4 Americans dead, an email chain including Hillary Clinton and her aides show them putting together “talking points” about what started the attack in Libya — including the Susan Rice lie that it was sparked by a YouTube video (this was created by the Obama White House).

From: Sullivan, Jacob J

Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11 :09 AM

To: ‘hdr22@clintoncmail.com’ <hdr22@clintonemail.com>

Cc: Mills, Cheryl D

Subject: Key points

HRC, Cheryl –

Below is my stab at tp’s for the Senator call. Cheryl, I’ve left the last point blank for you. These are rough but you get the point.

I look forward to sitting down and having a Hillary~to-John conversation about what we know. l know you were frustrated by the briefing we did and I’m sorry our hands were tied in that setting.

It’s important we see each other in person, but over the phone today I just wanted to make a few points.

First, we have been taking this deadly seriously, as we should. I set up the ARB in record time, with serious people on it. l will get to the bottom of all the security questions. We are also in overdrive working to track down the killers, and not just through the FBI. We will get this right.

Second, the White House and Susan were not making things up. They were going with what they were told by the IC [Intelligence community].

The real story may have been obvious to you from the start (and indeed I called it an assault by heavily armed militants in my first statement), but the IC gave us very different information. They were unanimous about it.

Let me read you an email from the day before Susan went on the shows. It provides the talking points for HPSCI [House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence] and for her public appearance. It’s from a very senior official at CIA, copying his counterparts at DNI [Director of National Intelligence], NCTC [National Counterterrorism Center], and FBI:

Here are the talking points …

–The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.

-This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated.

–The investigation is on-going, and the US Government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths US citizens.

That is exactly what Susan said, following the guidance from the IC. She obviously got bad advice. But she was not shading the truth.

Third, you have to remember that the video WAS important. We had four embassies breached because of protests inspired by it. Cairo, Tunis, Khartoum, and Sanaa. We had serious security challenges in Pakistan and Chennai and some other places. All this was happening at the same time. So many of the contemporaneous comments about the video weren’t referring in any way to Benghazi. Now of course even in those countries it was about much much more than the video, but the video was certainly a piece of it one we felt we had to speak to so that our allies in those countries would back us up.

Last month Judicial Watch obtained a previously hidden email which showed State Department officials were not only aware of Hillary’s private email, but used it to communicate with her.

FULL SHOW: CLINTON/NEW ZEALAND + EPSTEIN/PRINCE ANDREW + POROSHENKO/BIDEN + MORE,

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 10:17am:


great news !

here is the top tranny of NZ

Its sexism pure and simple, I am an idiot can't cope with women in power, so they have to be males.

it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 10:55am:


Yeah, we do.

You've just described yourself...

Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 10:17am:


Vaccinating kids in Africa is foolish, eh?

Kill them.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 10:50am:


Yes thank you for your honesty!

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 12:09pm:


No. That's spam.

Try posting that picture of Hillary with the clown lipstick instead, okay?

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 12:14pm:


Actually, it was a Qwant search.

The Mechanic suggested I should use it.

So, I Qwanted 'Donald Trump', and this is the first thing that came up:

Richdude wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2019 at 12:09pm:



You're welcome, I am honest in pointing out it was sexism from it is the light.