freediver wrote on Oct 20^th, 2019 at 1:12pm:


Do you have the right or ability to criticise the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 20^th, 2019 at 1:15pm:

You spend too much time with Muslims. You ask idiotic questions like they do.

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 17^th, 2019 at 2:27pm:


Soren, you've never "caught me out" in anything.  You need to post proof that I have "lied" ("knowingly told an untruth") for your claim to work.  You have failed dismally to even attempt that.  Tsk, tsk. 

[quote]

The ANU degree that you could not have got because they did not run the course you stated for ordinary people, only for military personnel with a rank far higher than a warehouse jockey. Also you clearly stating  you only had two, 22 year old children then all of a sudden 4 years later had another child who again was again 22, divine intervention perhaps

If you are going to lie be better at it.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 20^th, 2019 at 10:36pm:

I am talking about your idiotic questions, Paki.

Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2019 at 3:04pm:


You sly little Paki, you lying, dishonest little vibrant.  Your first question was: o you have the right or ability to criticise the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  Then the sticheroo came, like we see at the carpet markets of the Muslim world: "Do you have the right or ability to criticise Uncle's support for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  So from criticising the towel heads you switched to criticisng the US.

Of course you can criticise the Saudis. They are utter bastards. Like all the other Mohamedans such as Iran, Syria, Turkey, Somalia, Pakiland, etc. You can criticise even the non-Mohamedans, like gruesome  China. Even bastions of whitey civilisation like Germany, France, UK. You can criticise whoever you like as long as you have a good argument. We are not tribal here, Paki, like all you backward vibrants. Reason well, not 'take tribal sides well'.

As regards the Mohamedans, the West has woken up from the 'society-building for the Mohamedans' delusion. Now it's once again playing the sons of bitches against each other, as was the case for centuries. Which is the answer to your second question. The US is not to save the Mohamedans from themselves. If the Saudis are happy to bomb the sons of bitches in Yemen, that's one less bombing thee West has to do eventually. Locals solving local problems - are you against that? Or do you want the US to police everyone all the time?


Look at the UNHCR - a ridiculous pretence of civilisation:

Mauritania in north-west Africa isn’t really a beacon of human rights. Of the 4.5m population, 500,000 are slaves. Regardless, the UN General Assembly last week installed the military-run Mauritania onto the Human Rights Council (HRC) with 172 votes out of 193 in the secret ballot. Other human-rights exemplars voted in were Sudan, Libya and Venezuela, which beat off democratic candidate Costa Rica 105-96.
..
Others on the HRC are China, Cuba, Egypt, Qatar, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and African basket-cases like Somalia, Eritrea and Congo. This bloated 47-state body involves a quarter of the General Assembly.

President Trump a year ago pulled the US out of the HRC as a ‘cesspool of bias’ and ‘protector of human rights abusers’
https://www.spectator.com.au/2019/10/slaving-away-for-human-rights/


And how right he was. Does he have to start a war against every hideous regime? Would you support that? No. You are just talking shite, as always. The only improvement you are on Bwian is that you don't roll your eyes and yawn and - er... well, that's it.

freediver wrote on Oct 26^th, 2019 at 4:35pm:


When you answer my questions, Freediver, I might answer yours. 

freediver wrote on Oct 26^th, 2019 at 9:40pm:


Erecting a strawman argument, Freediver?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Such a foolish person you are and a hypocrite as well.