Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Meanwhile in Canada (Read 287 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16400
Gender: male
Meanwhile in Canada
Sep 20th, 2019 at 11:54am
 
"Canadians already suspicious of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax are likely be even more suspicious given a report by Ottawa-based Blacklock’s Reporter that Environment Canada omitted a century’s worth of observed weather data in developing its computer models on the impacts of climate change.

The scrapping of all observed weather data from 1850 to 1949 was necessary, a spokesman for Environment Canada told Blacklock’s Reporter, after researchers concluded that historically, there weren’t enough weather stations to create a reliable data set for that 100-year period.

“The historical data is not observed historical data,” the spokesman said. “It is modelled historical data … 24 models from historical simulations spanning 1950 to 2005 were used.”

These computer simulations are part of the federal government’s ClimateData.ca website launched by Environment Minister Catherine McKenna on Aug. 15.

She described it as “an important next step in giving our decision-makers even greater access to important climate data for long-term planning. The more each of us uses this type of information, the more it will help.”

"Blacklock’s Reporter, which describes itself as “the only reporter-owned and operated newsroom in Ottawa” focusing on intensive reporting of government documents, notes that in many cases the observed temperatures scrapped by Environment Canada in creating its computer models, were higher in the past than today.

For example, Vancouver had a higher record temperature in 1910 (30.6C) than in 2017 (29.5C).

Toronto had a warmer summer in 1852 (32.2C) than in 2017 (31.7C).

The highest temperature in Moncton in 2017 was four degrees cooler than in 1906.

Brandon, Man., had 49 days where the average daily temperature was above 20C in 1936, compared to only 16 in 2017, with a high temperature of 43.3C that year compared to 34.3C in 2017..."

https://theprovince.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-feds-scrapped-100-years-of-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13817
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Meanwhile in Canada
Reply #1 - Sep 20th, 2019 at 11:59am
 
lee has fallen off his horse again. Fortunately for lee he landed on his head which is protected by a 150 mm thickness of bone.

I once worked in Halifax Canada, and the local turkeys screamed drought if it didn't rain for 7 days.

Canada still kowtows to British anus.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16400
Gender: male
Re: Meanwhile in Canada
Reply #2 - Sep 20th, 2019 at 12:46pm
 
Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 20th, 2019 at 11:59am:
I once worked in Halifax Canada, and the local turkeys screamed drought if it didn't rain for 7 days.



They kicked you out? How wise.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Meanwhile in Canada
Reply #3 - Sep 22nd, 2019 at 11:04am
 



From lee's same article

Quote:
To be fair, the fact that it omitted observed weather data from 1850 to 1949 in developing its computer models is not evidence in and of itself of an attempt by Environment Canada to mislead the public.

Omitting observed historical weather data from computer models is common in climate science because of differences in the quality of the reporting of weather data today, compared to 1850 when historical records started being kept.

Also, weather is not climate.

Computer climate models don’t claim to predict what the weather will be like on any given day, month or year.

They predict long-term weather and climate patterns.

Climate scientists test their validity by assessing whether their models predicting future climate patterns can explain climate change patterns in the past, which is based on more data than that provided solely by historical records.

Finally, the fact that in some cases regional temperatures were warmer in the past than today, does not disprove the theory of human-induced climate change.


oh dear  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print