Gnads wrote on Sep 24
th, 2019 at 3:32pm:
So you doubt the original design engineer stating it was designed to handle/withstand being hit by jet airplanes?
And how would he know exactly?
Turns out he didn't - and admitted that later:
Quote:Leslie Robertson, one of the chief engineers working on the design of the World Trade Center, has since said he personally considered the scenario of the impact of a Boeing 707 or another jet airliner, which might be lost in the fog and flying at relatively low speeds while seeking to land at either JFK Airport or Newark Airport. However, in an interview with the BBC, Robertson claimed that, "with the 707, the fuel load was not considered in the design, I don't know how it could have been considered."[9]
[10]
Quote: In its report, NIST stated that the technical ability to perform a rigorous simulation of aircraft impact and ensuing fires is a recent development, and that the technical capability for such analysis would have been quite limited in the 1960s.
And even if they could somehow ensure it was 'commercial-sized jet proof' when it was built, it may not have been ~30 years later. Especially after some structural damage from the 1993 attack that was never properly fixed:
Quote:After the 1993 bombing, inspections found fireproofing to be deficient. The Port Authority was in the process of replacing it, but replacement had been completed on only 18 floors in 1 WTC, including all the floors affected by the aircraft impact and fires,[15] and on 13 floors in 2 WTC, although only three of these floors (77, 78, and 85) were directly affected by the aircraft impact.[16][note 2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center