Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 29
th, 2019 at 11:47am:
Orestes 2004 was looking at peer reviewed abstracts not scientists
That hasn't stopped NASA claiming otherwise.
NASA also claim Cook et al as scientists not as climate abstracts.
"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively
publishing climate scientists agree*:"
"J. Cook, et al, "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 8 No. 2, (15 May 2013); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024"
"N. Oreskes, “Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,” Science Vol. 306 no. 5702, p. 1686 (3 December 2004); DOI: 10.1126/science.1103618."
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/BTW - You do know skeptical science is a blog by J Cook of Cook et al 2013 fame. Circular logic much.