Brian Ross wrote on Sep 22
nd, 2019 at 4:31pm:
moses wrote on Sep 22
nd, 2019 at 2:24pm:
The story so far: the land was invaded by invaders in chains and their guards, these invaders in chains actually thought they had made some great discovery e.g., the missing link between ape and man. The reason they believed this to be the case was because our aboriginal people were still at least 40 - 45000 years behind the invaders in chains evolutionary progress.
Now jump forward another couple of hundred years and we have the loony leftards claiming that these supposed links between the ape and man had magic plows which did not need an animal to pull them, the people who were 45000 years behind the times actually had another power, they could make bushfires very manageable without once again, any tools which would have to be used in the control of bushfires.
They were magical farmers and fire fighters using the secret skills and tools of civilization 45000 years ago.
Your RACISM and BIGOTRY is showing, Moses. Get back to us when you've come up with something more plausible supported by evidence as good as the Agriculture is. You know, the records left in the journals written by early explorers and settlers? Tsk, tsk.
His ignorance more like it.
Aboriginals didn't need to 'plough' (Seneschal
) the ground to reap food. The ground they had 'fertile' already for their foods to produce.
You only need a plough - when the soil is compacted hard by the 'Hooved' animal.
So I ask all the Anti-Aboriginal experts here.
Being so smart n' all.
WHY THEN, DID THE ABORIGINAL PEOPLES 'NOT' PROGRESS BEYOND THE SO-CALLED STONE AGE
(although they were far more advanced than the white versions)?
...why the progression and then 'stop' like a stagnation of development (even though the Didgeridoo is only 6,000 years old)?
What is it that made them the way they are and to be dismissed in all manners by invading other peoples?
...was it the trees?