Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Women's Cricket now.. why not? (Read 2663 times)
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Aug 8th, 2019 at 6:14pm
 
[url][/url]https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/cricket-australia-unveils-transgender-player-guidelines/news-story/4de63ab071c61d0e3c1ef7a92e580e97

Cricket Australia has unveiled new guidelines to ensure transgender players can take part in the game at the highest levels.

The policy sets out a testosterone limit for transgender and gender-diverse players who want to play for state and national women’s teams.

“It doesn’t make any sense that today, people are discriminated against, harassed or excluded, because of who they are,” Cricket Australia chief executive Kevin Roberts said.

The guidelines also stipulate that cricket clubs “must not ask any player to undergo a medical examination for the purposes of gender verification”.

To be eligible for elite women’s teams, the players must show a testosterone concentration of less than 10 nanomoles per litre over at least 12 months.

They must also be able to demonstrate their elected gender is consistent with how they are living their lives on a daily basis.

The move more closely aligns Australia to the International Cricket Council’s gender diversity guidelines.

Cricket Australia’s policy also provides guidance to community clubs, supporting grassroots cricketers to compete as the gender with which they identify.


The guidelines cover everything from victimisation to privacy and providing suitable facilities, as well as the collection of personal information.

Transgender participation in sport has proved a thorny issue with some prominent stars, including tennis great Martina Navratilova who has voiced disquiet.



I am wondering how many WOMEN were involved in writing up this GUIDLINES LIST.


it seems to me


NONE. Angry Angry Angry Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #1 - Aug 8th, 2019 at 6:18pm
 
The ladies will soon perk up when  a 100kg trannie starts  bowling head hunters at them.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 8th, 2019 at 6:51pm by Mr Hammer »  
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6209
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #2 - Aug 8th, 2019 at 6:50pm
 
🤣🤣 my oath they will.



Sport has gone to the Muppets. Best way to object is to not watch it....which I won't.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Legend

Posts: 21749
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #3 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 2:38am
 
Surprised that the MeeToo movement did not get up in arms about the term "bowling a maiden over". But this just takes the extreme the other way.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16097
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #4 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 4:57am
 
I wonder if all those women suckered into supporting the LGBTIQSELFISH are feeling stoopid now?
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #5 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 8:37am
 
So what they're saying in mens cricket, they don't need a middle stump?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #6 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 8:42am
 
No it means in womens cricket extra equipment will be allowed ..... i.e.

an extra stump & 2 extra balls per over  Tongue Grin
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #7 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 8:45am
 
Read about this bs yesterday

Cricket Australia are as stupid as all the other sporting bodies that are going down this ridiculous PC inclusive path.

That'll put a whole new connotation on ball tampering in womens cricket now.  Grin
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
BigP
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1924
West Auckland
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #8 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 8:46am
 
""“It doesn’t make any sense that today, people are discriminated against, harassed or excluded, because of who they are,” Cricket Australia chief executive Kevin Roberts said.""

This will obviously come as a surprise to you Kev me ole kock, Men cannot play in a womans team and visa versa  you dick  lol
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #9 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:01am
 
Gnads wrote on Aug 9th, 2019 at 8:42am:
No it means in womens cricket extra equipment will be allowed ..... i.e.

an extra stump & 2 extra balls per over  Tongue Grin


I think it means both.
Womens cricket can have extra balls, and mens cricket can play without the middle stump.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #10 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:05am
 
you only have to IDENTIFY what the hell does that mean?.....

the sport is not allowed to ask them for a medical examination... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

they seriously have to take their word for it...


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




it makes sense to some!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #11 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:06am
 
why are we afraid of people who do not have to prove anything???


are we barking mad?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #12 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:12am
 
cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:05am:
you only have to IDENTIFY what the hell does that mean?.....

the sport is not allowed to ask them for a medical examination... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

they seriously have to take their word for it...


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




it makes sense to some!


I can't make up my mind whether to begin identifying as Hugh Jackman or Roger Federer. Can you help me decide?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #13 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:12am
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2019 at 6:18pm:
The ladies will soon perk up when  a 100kg trannie starts  bowling head hunters at them.




Only issue is that it will not happen from the point of view like every other sport transgender athletes aren't allowed to compete until hormone levels hit a certain point which will negate muscle strength.


But don't let facts get in the way of your rant.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Women's Cricket now.. why not?
Reply #14 - Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:14am
 
Gordon wrote on Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:12am:
cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2019 at 9:05am:
you only have to IDENTIFY what the hell does that mean?.....

the sport is not allowed to ask them for a medical examination... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

they seriously have to take their word for it...


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




it makes sense to some!


I can't make up my mind whether to begin identifying as Hugh Jackman or Roger Federer. Can you help me decide?




what team will it get you on gordy??....have you noticed this in only in sport these trannies identify 


what about an ALL GIRLS SCHOOL... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


will those be next?.....


its got to be the biggest scam.......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print