Quote:Men started to become nervous and anxious and feel diminished
and women had, for the first time in recorded history, access to reliable birth control, i.e., the Pill
'Keep em pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen', no longer applied
Women were pressed to gain paid employment and were able to decide how large their family would be
and easy-divorce was also available
As result, men no longer were able to impregnate their wives to keep them tied down and obedient/dependent and no-fault divorce meant women no longer had to remain with dominant, unsatisfactory, often brutal spouses who doled out the money, i.e., control
men were furious
the man might be a tiny insignificant cog in the workplace, he might be a physical weakling in the pub and an unsatisfactory husband and father in the home ... but the role of breadwinner and impregnator granted him 'respect' and obedience in the home
once he no longer could dominate and cow his wife and children thanks to the Pill, easy-divorce and paid employment for women ... he fell apart. He lost his sense of 'importance' and source of forced 'respect'
Women had for millenia had to obey the husband and so did the kids until they were of an age to punch him out or leave home
Men floundered and didn't know how to deal with women's liberation. And it was liberation. Police until the late 80s refused to become involved in 'domestics' despite bleeding and battered wives and kids standing right in front of them. Police upheld the 'male dominance' game. Often, those same police were themselves wife and kid bashers
So women finally were able to leave their husbands and obtain welfare if the children were small. Husbands were livid. Their captive wife and kids were beyond their control. And that control had consisted in most cases of money and fists
Raising children on their own, even with part time work and welfare assistance, is no easy task. Add to this that too many boys were raised in fatherless homes with the mother as breadwinner
not that being raised by a misogynistic, brutal father was ideal either
We're seeing the results today
and unfortunately, way too many women believe they need a man in their life which often turns into a succession of men who find divorcees and man-less females to be easy pickings .... as are their children. Many a paedophile has cottoned onto a lonely, rudderless woman in order to get at her kids
What's the problem here? No one's laying it out
but the fact is that men believe that they should rule
men also approach the entire sex issue far differently to women
Many women will put up with an unsatisfactory mate for the sake of being in a relationship
Many men will put up with what they consider to be an unsatisfactory relationship for the sake of regular sex
Many women hope a man will protect and be faithful, will 'love' the children of the relationship in the same way as the woman
Many men try to be interested in their offspring and may try to fill the role of 'good' husband and father
but most men are by nature promiscuous. And it's Natur's dictate that a man cast his seed widely
women rely on a man being faithful so that he'll devote his time, energy, money etc. into raising offspring to maturity
It was never going to work and makes you wonder who devised it
Men enjoy male company most of all, if they're honest. Male friends are less complicated and more fun than women
Women, forced by Nature into having to compete and drive off female competitors for the male, are competitive by Nature. Women bitch about and criticise each other. Women's Lib/feminism is trying to coax women out of these habits and to get them to cooperate with each other. But it's going to be a very long battle
Most men make what women consider to be suggestive remarks and action because men are natural hunters. A compliment or touch on the bum is the man's way of letting the woman know he desires her. It's ingrained
and if truth be told, women take it as a 'sort of' compliment because it's not so long ago that it led to mating, procreating and a male protector/provider. But women are being programmed by feminism to regard male advances as 'sexist' and something to be punished
Barnaby Joyce, despite his physical repulsiveness, seems to have no difficulty in winning women. Why? How did Joyce select and win his first wife? According to Natalie Joyce, Barnaby gave her the once over and said, 'You'll do'. That simple, that succinct. He let her know he'd selected her. And she married him, bore him four children, supported him, overlooked his many reported indiscretions and even fought for him after he'd impregnated his new choice of mate
That's how it used to work and continued to work for millenia. The man did the choosing and the women were flattered to have been chosen
It still works the same way today. Many a 'feminist' has been picked up at a pub, ended up living with the guy, bearing his children and hoping like mad he'll stick around, even though these days, many men choose not to marry them
Feminism hasn't a chance against Nature
The positives to emerge from the new way lies in the fact men are becoming mindful not to make suggestive remarks etc. in the workplace -- because paid employment is hard to get and social media means he's likely to be outed and dumped by his boss or 'steady root'
the negatives lie in the fact women are having children to numerous men who move on
run out of room