greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 12
th, 2019 at 8:47am:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jul 12
th, 2019 at 2:07am:
Wait for all the virtue signalling morons out there that will say that we should be culturally sensitive to Muslims keeping slaves. And that we should not be so racist for impeding their religious freedoms to keep slaves.
There is no mention of Muslims in the article.
No mention of immigrants, either.
why you keep flogging your dead-horse comments greg?
it's established that 99.7% of Afghanis are muslim
and it's obvious they're migrants under one or another of the globalist terminologies or by now they'd be fully versed in what constitutes appropriate and lawful behaviours under Australian law
So quit arguing for the sake of it in your usual gleeful 'stirring to frustrate and make people enjoy their day less than before they read your posts' personal agenda of spite and self-dissatisfaction
you're only happy when you're pizzing people off
Yes, they are muslim immigrants
they have trashed the values and laws of the host nation and host population
they're being criticised for doing so
they've been apprehended
they will be punished
and there's the not unsubstantial matter of $89,000 which is rightly suspected of being taxpayers' money
Islam is not a mere religion. It's a culture, a way of life for its followers
The traitorous Australian government lifted bigamy laws to accommodate muslims, although an Australian/white bigamist will feel the hand of law on his collar
The traitorous Australian government changed the terminology re: bigamy but only as it applied to muslims. The traitorous Australian government deems bigamous muslim marriages to be 'religious marriages'
thereby relieving itself of having to prosecute the flood of mulim immigrants
so, muslims but not Australians are permitted to have four 'religious marriages' and each of those 'religious multiple wives and their offspring' are entitled to receive free money from the taxpayers plus free housing
The media has gone very quiet about the slave keeping husband of to date, two muslim wives because questions hover over the $89,000 reportedly belonging to Wife Two whom the muslim slave keeper husband dumped in Afghanistan
Naturally, Australian taxpayers are curious to learn how the slave wife Number Two managed to accumulate $89,000 despite reportedly being a full-time slave to her muslim husband, his mother and brother
If Wife Two or the slavekeeping muslim husband try to claim she earned it whilst simultaneously performing as a full time slave, then naturally, the ATO would have records of when, where and in what capacity that money was earned
If the ATO does not have record of that money, then slave Wife Two and her muslim spouse will be required to explain how she came into possession of the money
and if it's discovered the money was provided her by the Australian taxpayer, then the muslim slave keeping husband and Wife Two will find themselves subject to further charges -- or at least the taxpayer would expect that to be the case and will want to know why not, if not
the slave keeping muslim husband, in my opinion, was running a scam. And he was brought undone thanks to Australian law and Wife Two who dobbed on him
it's a good start and hopefully other women will gain confidence in the fact that they too can gain justice from a civilized host nation
How much has that family, with its two slave wives and including the slave keeping husband, his mother and brother, cost this nation in real terms is the question. And what is this government going to do about it and also to make sure it is rooted out and expelled with amendments to immigration as pertains to certain ethnicities and yes, religions?
You do realise that's racist, yes? You do understand that some members here will get most offended by your remarks, given they see Islam as a religious conquest for world domination?
Culture, innit. Backward, inbred, performative. Stupid
mendacious. Correlation not causation.