Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty (Read 3080 times)
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79579
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #30 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #31 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:44am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...


I never said he was a rapist although I suspect he is....Being an ass hole is not a crime but being able to call an ass hole an ass hole is my right....You can defend the dickhead all you want....Says a lot about you mate when you call out people for having a different opinion as an emotional response....He is a scum bag mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #32 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 11:51am
 
Was he a scumbag to you before this accusation?

And I'd bet you'd know or heard of a heap of blokes who have done something similar to what you're hopping up & down about Jarrett doing.

Note I'm not inferring anything regarding rape.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #33 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 12:20pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 11:51am:
Was he a scumbag to you before this accusation?

And I'd bet you'd know or heard of a heap of blokes who have done something similar to what you're hopping up & down about Jarrett doing.

Note I'm not inferring anything regarding rape.


I know a few blokes who fit this type....They are no longer associates of mine....You???

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #34 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 12:44pm
 
That wasn't the question ... was Jarrett an arsehole to you before said accusation?
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #35 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 2:30pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 12:44pm:
That wasn't the question ... was Jarrett an arsehole to you before said accusation?


No actually....Didn't even know who he was....But the revelations about screwing a woman whilst his wife was asleep in the next room gave him away....So yes he was an ass hole before said accusation....Would you prefer I made a judgement call before knowing he was an ass hole???

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #36 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:41pm
 
Now he is suing for defamation.  Not sure I would have advised him to do that so early.

Link.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 20609
ACT
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #37 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:49pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:41pm:
Redmond Neck wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:40pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:31pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 6th, 2019 at 2:26am:
The complainant was 19 years old at the time and said she did not go to police until late 2017 because she feared she would not be believed.


I don't believe that John Jarratt did not rape her. But, 41 years is such a long time to report the rape that the complainant should not consider the matter a "rape". John Jarratt's celebrity status these days should mean that the complainant would be even more fearful that she would not be believed.

The Meetoo movement has a lot to answer for pushing women to bring up sexual assault matters that are over 5 years of age. Save for youth or mental impairment concerns, even a month after an alleged rape is a long time to report to authorities.


I agree its one persons word against the other, which explains the quick decision from the jury in my opinion.




Pell?


True, but I think they were quite different cases, Pells was a retrial based on the evidence of the first shown on film wasnt it, he never personally participated in fact did he even make any statement in the first? not sure?

Anyway Jarratts seemed much shorter and simpler I thought but good point though Aussie!
Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #38 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:57pm
 
Redmond Neck wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:49pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:41pm:
Redmond Neck wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:40pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jul 7th, 2019 at 4:31pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 6th, 2019 at 2:26am:
The complainant was 19 years old at the time and said she did not go to police until late 2017 because she feared she would not be believed.


I don't believe that John Jarratt did not rape her. But, 41 years is such a long time to report the rape that the complainant should not consider the matter a "rape". John Jarratt's celebrity status these days should mean that the complainant would be even more fearful that she would not be believed.

The Meetoo movement has a lot to answer for pushing women to bring up sexual assault matters that are over 5 years of age. Save for youth or mental impairment concerns, even a month after an alleged rape is a long time to report to authorities.


I agree its one persons word against the other, which explains the quick decision from the jury in my opinion.




Pell?


True, but I think they were quite different cases, Pells was a retrial based on the evidence of the first shown on film wasnt it, he never personally participated in fact did he even make any statement in the first? not sure?

Anyway Jarratts seemed much shorter and simpler I thought but good point though Aussie!


Whatever......in basic terms it was one person's word against another.  In criminal cases, proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt.  How on this Earth can anyone one of us be confident of proof to that degree when it is one on one.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79579
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #39 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:14pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:41pm:
Now he is suing for defamation.  Not sure I would have advised him to do that so early.

Link.


If they reported the facts and only the facts without impugning his character......

Did they splash Lurid Headlines about with Gaye Abandon?

John Jarratt Rapist of Young girl, now Finally Charged - After 40 Years!!!


FINALLY - Justice for Teenage Victim of John Jarratt!!!
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79579
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #40 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:19pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:44am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...



I never said he was a rapist although I suspect he is....Being an ass hole is not a crime but being able to call an ass hole an ass hole is my right....You can defend the dickhead all you want....Says a lot about you mate when you call out people for having a different opinion as an emotional response....He is a scum bag mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


It was your use of the term 'right wing wankers' that gave your emotional state away... nobody has to be a 'right wing' anything to simply state facts....

Where on Earth would you get the idea that I'm 'right wing' anything?  And when did I abrogate your right to call him an asshole?  I merely said that being an asshole had no political affiliation... but you're in Faroffwa, aren't you?  Look at the prize penises voted into Parliament from out that way...   Cool

You may re-read what I posted at your leisure - and then come back with a coherent and unemotional reply ...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #41 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:23pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:14pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 3:41pm:
Now he is suing for defamation.  Not sure I would have advised him to do that so early.

Link.


If they reported the facts and only the facts without impugning his character......

Did they splash Lurid Headlines about with Gaye Abandon?

John Jarratt Rapist of Young girl, now Finally Charged - After 40 Years!!!


FINALLY - Justice for Teenage Victim of John Jarratt!!!


Did they?  You tell me...with some links.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #42 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:43pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:19pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:44am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...



I never said he was a rapist although I suspect he is....Being an ass hole is not a crime but being able to call an ass hole an ass hole is my right....You can defend the dickhead all you want....Says a lot about you mate when you call out people for having a different opinion as an emotional response....He is a scum bag mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


It was your use of the term 'right wing wankers' that gave your emotional state away... nobody has to be a 'right wing' anything to simply state facts....

Where on Earth would you get the idea that I'm 'right wing' anything?  And when did I abrogate your right to call him an asshole?  I merely said that being an asshole had no political affiliation... but you're in Faroffwa, aren't you?  Look at the prize penises voted into Parliament from out that way...   Cool

You may re-read what I posted at your leisure - and then come back with a coherent and unemotional reply ...


Jarratt is an ass hole and you defend him....Sook!!!

Cry Cry Cry
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #43 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:53pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:43pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:19pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:44am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...



I never said he was a rapist although I suspect he is....Being an ass hole is not a crime but being able to call an ass hole an ass hole is my right....You can defend the dickhead all you want....Says a lot about you mate when you call out people for having a different opinion as an emotional response....He is a scum bag mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


It was your use of the term 'right wing wankers' that gave your emotional state away... nobody has to be a 'right wing' anything to simply state facts....

Where on Earth would you get the idea that I'm 'right wing' anything?  And when did I abrogate your right to call him an asshole?  I merely said that being an asshole had no political affiliation... but you're in Faroffwa, aren't you?  Look at the prize penises voted into Parliament from out that way...   Cool

You may re-read what I posted at your leisure - and then come back with a coherent and unemotional reply ...


Jarratt is an ass hole and you defend him....Sook!!!

Cry Cry Cry


As you should be aware he wasn't on trial for screwing his "roommate" ...

he was on trial for "rape".

He was found not guilty after 15 mins deliberation

so his name has been dragged through the mud.

He has a right to seek redress

If it can be found that the accusations of rape were false & the boot then ends up on the other foot ..... the accusers.

And sanctimonious twerps like yourself have to eat your words.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19597
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Oh, BTW - John Jarratt was found not guilty
Reply #44 - Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:58pm
 
Gnads wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:53pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:43pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 4:19pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:44am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 9:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 8th, 2019 at 8:58am:
What a prize ass hole....Screwing a sheila whilst his wife slept in the next bedroom and he is the victim....It is no wonder you right wing wankers support this dickhead!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


No political affiliation associated with someone being unfaithful.... being a prize asshole is not yet a crime.... and no - he is not the victim of a random shag - he was found not guilty of an allegation of rape... meaning essentially that legally there is no victim ....

Beware the rush to the head of emotion and emotive response ...



I never said he was a rapist although I suspect he is....Being an ass hole is not a crime but being able to call an ass hole an ass hole is my right....You can defend the dickhead all you want....Says a lot about you mate when you call out people for having a different opinion as an emotional response....He is a scum bag mate!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


It was your use of the term 'right wing wankers' that gave your emotional state away... nobody has to be a 'right wing' anything to simply state facts....

Where on Earth would you get the idea that I'm 'right wing' anything?  And when did I abrogate your right to call him an asshole?  I merely said that being an asshole had no political affiliation... but you're in Faroffwa, aren't you?  Look at the prize penises voted into Parliament from out that way...   Cool

You may re-read what I posted at your leisure - and then come back with a coherent and unemotional reply ...


Jarratt is an ass hole and you defend him....Sook!!!

Cry Cry Cry


As you should be aware he wasn't on trial for screwing his "roommate" ...

he was on trial for "rape".

He was found not guilty after 15 mins deliberation

so his name has been dragged through the mud.

He has a right to seek redress

If it can be found that the accusations of rape were false & the boot then ends up on the other foot ..... the accusers.

And sanctimonious twerps like yourself have to eat your words.


What words are they....I called him an ass hole not a rapist....Making crap up again???

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print