You're incorrect.
It's a public water supply ... a supply that is an essential service ...that requires no more treatment than being at the required safe levels for drinking.
It should not be a vessel for the mass medication of a community/society with a contaminated industry waste product Fluorosilic Acid.
The science for this came out of the USA(just like hydraulic fracking) from the industries that made this toxic waste after they were unable to dump it straight into the environment.
Now it is dumped through humans as a supposed dental health measure.
It doesn't work.
Quote:Most developed nations do not fluoridate their water. In western Europe, for example, only 3% of the population consumes fluoridated water.
While 25 countries have water fluoridation programs, 11 of these countries have less than 20% of their population consuming fluoridated water: Argentina (19%), Guatemala (13%), Panama (15%), Papa New Guinea (6%), Peru (2%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), South Korea (6%), the United Kingdom (11%), and Vietnam (4%).
Only 11 countries in the world have more than 50% of their population drinking fluoridated water: Australia (80%), Brunei (95%); Chile (70%), Guyana (62%), Hong Kong (100%), the Irish Republic (73%), Israel (70%), Malaysia (75%), New Zealand (62%), Singapore (100%), and the United States (64%).
In total, 377,655,000 million people worldwide drink artificially fluoridated water. This represents 5% of the world’s population.
There are more people drinking fluoridated water in the United States than the rest of the world combined.
There is no difference in tooth decay between western nations that fluoridate their water and those that do not.
https://fluoridealert.org/content/bfs-2012/
Forum
Pages: 
