Australian Politics Forum - Wallabies to revolt for Israel

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #15 - May 14^th, 2019 at 11:41am

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:32am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 10:53am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 10:48am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 10:34am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 10:18am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 8:54am:

The Wallaby Team is on the verge of 'revolting' on behalf of Israel Folau.

Now that's thrown a spanner in the works of the Media's 'Gay Support Movement' Wink

Weird I heard the opposite.

Yeah you may be weird but I heard the players were supporting Israel as well. Roll Eyes

Only the Pacific Islander players?

Yeah and how many of them are there?

Not all of them. Plus they have it wrong, he's not being sacked because of his religion, he's being sacked fgor breach of contract.

And if his contract was written prior to this amendment and no signed amendment has been attached then the breach and punishment are invalid.

Incorrect.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 28027 Gender:	Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel Reply #16 - May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am Ok why?
Back to top	"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #17 - May 14^th, 2019 at 11:55am

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

Ok why?

Because when new policies in a workplace are introduced, they cover all current employees.

And, there is certainly no legal requirement whatsoever to sign anything.

If your employer introduces a policy tomorrow that stipulates, for example, that nobody is to come to work with colouring in their hair, that policy applies to everyone, no matter how long they've worked there.

Moreover, there is no requirement for the policy document to be signed by the employees.

Back to top

IP Logged

Laugh till you cry Gold Member Offline Posts: 13817 In your happy place Gender:	Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel Reply #18 - May 14^th, 2019 at 12:18pm The whole team will be labeled as bigots. Folau made a big mistake by making himself bigger than rugby and needs to pay a price. He should be smart enough not to drag the whole team into his bigotry.
Back to top	Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Online

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47350
At my desk.

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #19 - May 14^th, 2019 at 12:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:55am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

Ok why?

Because when new policies in a workplace are introduced, they cover all current employees.

And, there is certainly no legal requirement whatsoever to sign anything.

If your employer introduces a policy tomorrow that stipulates, for example, that nobody is to come to work with colouring in their hair, that policy applies to everyone, no matter how long they've worked there.

Moreover, there is no requirement for the policy document to be signed by the employees.

So an employer could literally force everyone with coloured hair to shave their hair off or lose their jobs?

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #20 - May 14^th, 2019 at 12:58pm

freediver wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 12:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:55am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

Ok why?

Because when new policies in a workplace are introduced, they cover all current employees.

And, there is certainly no legal requirement whatsoever to sign anything.

If your employer introduces a policy tomorrow that stipulates, for example, that nobody is to come to work with colouring in their hair, that policy applies to everyone, no matter how long they've worked there.

Moreover, there is no requirement for the policy document to be signed by the employees.

So an employer could literally force everyone with coloured hair to shave their hair off or lose their jobs?

They would allow the employees to grow it out while still working (when the policy is first implemented).

Or, they'd ask them to stay home until it has grown out.

What colour is your hair, FD?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Online Australian Legend Posts: 21719 Rockhampton, Q Gender:	Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel Reply #21 - May 14^th, 2019 at 1:02pm Pfft! I thought the Wallabies had been revolting for a while now. When are they going to start winning games?
Back to top	IP Logged

Laugh till you cry

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13817
In your happy place
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #22 - May 14^th, 2019 at 1:19pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 12:58pm:

freediver wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 12:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:55am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

Ok why?

Because when new policies in a workplace are introduced, they cover all current employees.

And, there is certainly no legal requirement whatsoever to sign anything.

If your employer introduces a policy tomorrow that stipulates, for example, that nobody is to come to work with colouring in their hair, that policy applies to everyone, no matter how long they've worked there.

Moreover, there is no requirement for the policy document to be signed by the employees.

So an employer could literally force everyone with coloured hair to shave their hair off or lose their jobs?

They would allow the employees to grow it out while still working (when the policy is first implemented).

Or, they'd ask them to stay home until it has grown out.

What colour is your hair, FD?

I'm curious.

My money is on white with grey roots.

Back to top

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46448
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #23 - May 14^th, 2019 at 1:38pm

The Policy of enforcing unsigned amendments is a NZ thing.
You sign a Contract and then they change the rules.
They even make NZ'ers sign really bullying contracts - or no job.
This is a corrupt enforcement.
If Israel didn't sign any 'added' small print extras added on, then they won't hold up in Court, etc.
I've worked a few jobs where they've changed Policies, etc and I've always had to (by choice) sign the 'updated' extra bits or not. Most of them are pedantic and of no real importance.

So basically 'Sport' (now ruled by the Media) in Australia is ANTI-CHRISTIAN in its stance - no? Huh

You might find that if the rest of the players (nearly all are heavily Christian, regardless if they are yellow Pineapple Polynesian, black Coconut Melanesian or whatever) revolt and stand by Israel, then the 'spill-over' effect will begin into other codes of Sport.

Israel is an exceptional 'new standard' of Australian Sportsman - he has played AFL, NRL & ARU.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #24 - May 14^th, 2019 at 2:38pm

Jasin wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 1:38pm:

The Policy of enforcing unsigned amendments is a NZ thing.
You sign a Contract and then they change the rules.
They even make NZ'ers sign really bullying contracts - or no job.
This is a corrupt enforcement.
If Israel didn't sign any 'added' small print extras added on, then they won't hold up in Court, etc.

Incorrect.

There's no need for a signature.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34499
Gender: female

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #25 - May 14^th, 2019 at 2:45pm

freediver wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 12:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:55am:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:48am:

Ok why?

Because when new policies in a workplace are introduced, they cover all current employees.

And, there is certainly no legal requirement whatsoever to sign anything.

If your employer introduces a policy tomorrow that stipulates, for example, that nobody is to come to work with colouring in their hair, that policy applies to everyone, no matter how long they've worked there.

Moreover, there is no requirement for the policy document to be signed by the employees.

So an employer could literally force everyone with coloured hair to shave their hair off or lose their jobs?

Dying it might be a less drastic option.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #26 - May 14^th, 2019 at 2:48pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 2:38pm:

Jasin wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 1:38pm:

The Policy of enforcing unsigned amendments is a NZ thing.
You sign a Contract and then they change the rules.
They even make NZ'ers sign really bullying contracts - or no job.
This is a corrupt enforcement.
If Israel didn't sign any 'added' small print extras added on, then they won't hold up in Court, etc.

Incorrect.

There's no need for a signature.

"We have recently introduced a new company policy and requested that employees sign and return the acknowledgement form.

"What happens if an employee refuses to sign the acknowledgement form?

"The law:

"There is no legal obligation for an employee to sign a policy acknowledgement form and therefore employers should not try to force an employee’s signature."

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 72209
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #27 - May 14^th, 2019 at 3:01pm

sorry, but the guys an idiot. Sure,he's free to believe what he wants, but if your contract for $1m plus per annum says you can't put anything that might be deemed hateful on social media, you don't put anything hateful on social media. .. it's not that difficult. He gets paid bloody good money for something that many do every weekend for free.

If he wants to risk the contract just to try and prove that he has a right to say what he likes, then he doesn't deserve that contract ... there are a lot of young kids who would love that contract in his place and who would gladly follow whatever rules Rugby Australia sets out for them in order to do so.

No ones ever said s he has to embrace gays or denounce his religion.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 72209
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #28 - May 14^th, 2019 at 3:03pm

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:36am:

His contract has been in place longer than inclusion of social media commentary bans.

He claims he hadn't signed anything amending his contract.

He signed a new contract at the start of the year. The social media clause would have been included because they've already had this issue with him in the past.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male

Re: Wallabies to revolt for Israel
Reply #29 - May 14^th, 2019 at 3:05pm

John Smith wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 3:03pm:

Gnads wrote on May 14^th, 2019 at 11:36am:

His contract has been in place longer than inclusion of social media commentary bans.

He claims he hadn't signed anything amending his contract.

He signed a new contract at the start of the year. The social media clause would have been included because they've already had this issue with him in the past.

It doesn't have to be in his signed contract.

He's still covered by it.

Back to top

IP Logged