freediver wrote on May 29
th, 2019 at 10:08am:
Which is of course why you never actually demonstrated that they were banned because of what they said about Islam. BTW, seeing as you are struggling so much with logic, merely demonstrating that they were banned and that they also interpret Islam is not a demonstration that that was the reason for their ban. It makes no more sense than pointing out that they eat corn flakes for breakfast and then claiming that was the reason for their ban.
You didn't say they can say whatever they like about Islam FD, you said
freediver wrote on Feb 22
nd, 2019 at 9:49am:
Islamic extremists in Indonesia can say whatever they want.
I take it you no longer stand by this. Good.
Also, you made it very clear why you think they were banned - for wanting jihad and establishing the caliphate. You even quoted their position on jihad, and how threatening it must be to the state. This was not an unrelated 'by the way' thing, akin to them eating cornflakes for breakfast - it was an obvious causal link. No one is trying to draw a link between eating cornflakes and posing a violent threat to the state. However the same can't be said for their position on violently overthrowing the state. That should be pretty obvious I would have thought.
Now you are trying to tell me that talk of jihad and caliphates and how to violently carry them out isn't talk about Islam. To which there is no sensible response.