Several years ago, a British team of archeologists digging found some evidence of copper wire buried beneath the ground at a depth of approximately 4 feet.

They concluded that this was evidence of a earlier British society with telecommunication as early as the 1600s.

Not to be outdone, the Swedish dug deeper, and also found evidence of copper deposited at a depth of 8 feet.

They concluded that this was evidence of an even earlier CIVILIZATION with telecommunication before the 1200s.


The Australian sycophantic archeologists drug even deeper 25 feet and found absolutely nothing.

They concluded that Australian aboriginals were so advanced that they had wireless communications from the start.



People, making shite up in order to make a silk purse out of a sows ear is not new.

Aboriginals were PRE-STONEAGE when we found them.
They had no written language
They had no architectural skill
They had no stone age weapons, even lashing a rock to a stick was beyond them.
They had no agricultural ability
The only animals they kept were dingos.

Even the simple skill of starting fire was beyond them, they carried embers wrapped in paperback.

This bullshite we are expected to believe about being great thinkers, great land keepers, wonderful people who were perfect before invasion is simply BULL SHITE.

They were primitives, brutal and disjointed.

And all the crap that is thought up by these sycophants does nothing but make them look even worse.

Evidence of having no evidence is bull shite.

Just a new aboriginal industry, that of claiming exceptionalism.

There are two views of aboriginals, the romantic twaddle of the luvvies who see them as bush fairies and conservators of the land with some sort of special spiritual resonance with country  and the pragmatic reality that they are a tribal people no different to any others around the world.

Tribal people have always, everywhere, looked to the skies for cues to seasons, the worlds natural ebb and flow of resources, when fish and flowers are in, when to plant and when to harvest.  The skies are full of stories and creation myths, again all over the world. Only here with the idiots of the left in the cause of aboriginal exceptionalism it’s claimed as aboriginals discovered astronomy. 

Same with being bush fairies and conservators, constrained by lack of resources because they did not have the means to exploit those resources, ie just sticks and rocks, it’s hard to make a negative impact on a continent, it’s not that they were proto greenies, they just had a small imprint on the land.  When chopping down a tree is a major endeavour you don’t go about clear felling for log cabins, but thats just technology, given the opportunity they would prefer the log cabin to the bark hut because, being people, not exceptional, they recognise and value comfort and ease.

Aquaculture is another claim for aboriginal exceptionalism, again, used throughout the world.

Aboriginals inhabited a stable and eroded continent which means many of the earliest artifacts still survive which then brings forth claims of oldest continuous culture, though of course, Australia was at the end of mans migration out of Africa, people are older and been elsewhere longer  everywhere else.  Kalahari bushmen and PNG tribal would have equal and better claims to an ancient existing culture, but they don’t have boosters who can point to old rocks covered with ochre. 

Aboriginal exceptionalism is a luvvie manifestation of cultural cringe on behalf of aboriginals. Instead of thinking and treating them as different to the rest of humanity they would have been less destructive to recognise them as fellow humans.       

The outrage when it is suggested that Aboriginal peoples were more than the absolute basic form of life is hilarious.

You just can't make it work with your prejudice, can you? All of these scientific discoveries that speak not of great pyramids, (but behold the derision) but of a level of sophistication and a unique intelligence that fleshes them out a little.

You simply prefer to think of them as little more than animals.

You just refuse to be interested in Aboriginal people. It's astonishing. You learned in school that they were stone age and you will not challenge that ... because then you would have to question yourselves.

And then you'd have to admit for all of the shortcomings of Aboriginals (that you rely on to keep them being less than you), they didn't utterly root this country in just over 200 years. It took us to do that.

Perhaps if you stopped exaggerating all of the claims made by anthropologists, botanists, archaeologists, etc, so as to make it ridiculous and therefore more easy to dismiss, you'd see that nothing outlandish has been claimed. It all makes perfect sense.

You just don't want to challenge your colonial ideas. Fortunately, you are in the minority and the world will move on and leave you behind.

Just a new aboriginal industry, that of claiming exceptionalism.

There are two views of aboriginals, the romantic twaddle of the luvvies who see them as bush fairies and conservators of the land with some sort of special spiritual resonance with country  and the pragmatic reality that they are a tribal people no different to any others around the world.

Tribal people have always, everywhere, looked to the skies for cues to seasons, the worlds natural ebb and flow of resources, when fish and flowers are in, when to plant and when to harvest.  The skies are full of stories and creation myths, again all over the world. Only here with the idiots of the left in the cause of aboriginal exceptionalism it’s claimed as aboriginals discovered astronomy. 

Same with being bush fairies and conservators, constrained by lack of resources because they did not have the means to exploit those resources, ie just sticks and rocks, it’s hard to make a negative impact on a continent, it’s not that they were proto greenies, they just had a small imprint on the land.  When chopping down a tree is a major endeavour you don’t go about clear felling for log cabins, but thats just technology, given the opportunity they would prefer the log cabin to the bark hut because, being people, not exceptional, they recognise and value comfort and ease.

Aquaculture is another claim for aboriginal exceptionalism, again, used throughout the world.

Aboriginals inhabited a stable and eroded continent which means many of the earliest artifacts still survive which then brings forth claims of oldest continuous culture, though of course, Australia was at the end of mans migration out of Africa, people are older and been elsewhere longer  everywhere else.  Kalahari bushmen and PNG tribal would have equal and better claims to an ancient existing culture, but they don’t have boosters who can point to old rocks covered with ochre. 

Aboriginal exceptionalism is a luvvie manifestation of cultural cringe on behalf of aboriginals. Instead of thinking and treating them as different to the rest of humanity they would have been less destructive to recognise them as fellow humans.       

The likes of Bwibwi and Moths post preposterous rubbish like this so when the enviable replies come in, they can look at themselves in the mirror, form their mouths into the shape of a cats bum and reflect on how morally superior they are. 

Gordon wrote on May 8^th, 2019 at 7:23pm:


Quite the reverse. You refute all claims out hand as "preposterous" to justify your feelings of superiority.

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2019 at 7:31pm:


Let's wait to hear what Gordon's race invented, Mother.

We Aussies invented the Hills Hoist.

Superior culture, innit.

Mattyfisk wrote on May 8^th, 2019 at 7:34pm:


The world is full of treasures of human endeavor.

It's also interesting how the dates of sophisticated civilisations are being pushed way back. Ever heard of Göbekli Tepe?

Gordon wrote on May 8^th, 2019 at 7:39pm:


Never. Aussies also invented the goon.

What did you people ever invent?

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 8^th, 2019 at 4:20pm:



Except of course, no outlandish claims have been made. Your impulse is to diminish, dismiss and ridicule.

Just as you are trying to do with me by relegating my commentary to a "bee in my bonnet".

I'm happy to not call Aboriginal culture stone age because of the negative connotations and it's really not meaningful. Hunter gatherers is the perfect description.

20,000 years to research and develop a 'STICK'...........'Aboriginal Science'........

you know K , i was in woorabinda which was a dry settlement and i went back and there was a wet canteen with a plaque (proudly opened by Wayne Goss premier Qld).

and the locals could only drink at the canteen, they couldnt take unopened cans back to their houses.

so they would buy 2 cartons and the guy behind the bar would pull the rings on 48 cans and then they would take them back to their houses and get smashed.( i suppose they didnt mind them being flat).

so please dont lecture me about our noble leftie politicians.

and there at woorabinda were a core of old grandmas who looked after all the local grandkids and held the place together and they were raised in a local baptist missionary . so the baptists did a much better job of assisting aborigines then the progressive left have ever done 

Aboriginals seem to have the SUPERIOR form of ART expression in this country.
Whiteys can only beg, borrow and steal from the rest of the world styles, here. Nothing 'original' or unique to this Country.
What? Painting portraits of Media Celebrity Ego, in an Archibald - is 'different'? 

And Australia farming inventions without which much of the world would be going hungry. And that's the difference, the Aboriginals subsisted, Western early settlers invented.

and the average life expectancy of Aboriginals is? Before colonisation they lived short brutal lives and used infanticide and cannibalism as a method of population control.

All factual and easily checked.

mothra wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 5:21pm:


Both your "better people" and "better off" are hugely subjective. Who are better people? What do they do that makes them better, don't beat their spouses or don't mutilate their children? What if they do and their society would fail without it? That would hurt them all.

Does success have anything to do with doing better, as a people, not as individuals?

What does better off mean? There are aboriginals that live within the culture that is Australia, today, are they better off? You'd have to ask each and every one before coming to conclusion that "they" are worse off, again subjective. For most aboriginal activists I'd ask them if they would be better off not existing. If they have European DNA, they would not exists to complain. They should thank their lives for it. If these people could look out beyond their victimhood, they would realise that. Perhaps they do but where there's a dollar...

Setanta wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 6:38pm:


Fumy you should go on about seeking the counsel of the individual before launching into yet another pig-ignorant, bigoted characterisation of the general "victimhood" and money-grubbing.

I expect no less.

I assume you prefer to think they only invented a stick also. Helps when you think like that, yeah?

rhino wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 3:57pm:



And they lived here for tens of thousands of years ... we've trashed it in 200.

Setanta wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:00pm:


Didn't think you'd understand.

Gotta justify that prejudice hey.

Didn't Set take in an indigenous child of a neighbor with drug issues recently?

At least he's not a posturing poser who feels morally superior by manufacturing offense at everything.

Gordon wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:07pm:



You mistake acts of personal charity with overall good will. You think just because you've done some good in your life, it excuses you from the kind off bullshit prejudice you want to express.

The fact of the matter is, Set took me to task for not taking a thorough census on whether i thought all Aboriginals felt they were better off for being colonised (why this is even a question is beyond me ... amazing bigotry) in a thread about how we have been underestimating them willfully for generations so he could seque into whinging about what victims they think they all are.

If you can't see the hypocrisy and prejudice in that, you're an even bigger idiot than i had previously thought you.

mothra wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:11pm:


And Setanta letting a Sudanese refo camp under his house is another show of his bigotry and hypocrisy. The man knows knows bounds!

Setanta wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:17pm:



Gotta make sure we know he was Sudanese.

I think that's what we call 'virtue signalling'.

Didn't Set take in an indigenous child of a neighbor with drug issues recently?

At least he's not a posturing poser who feels morally superior by manufacturing offense at everything.

rhino wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 3:57pm:



And they lived here for tens of thousands of years ... we've trashed it in 200.

Setanta wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:00pm:


Didn't think you'd understand.

Gotta justify that prejudice hey.

mothra wrote on May 9^th, 2019 at 7:16pm:



and when set tells us this story he is a "virtue signaller'
and when you tell us this story you are a "?"

ah, for stating scientific fact we are now bigots and racists.

mothra wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 11:47am:


Well.... if we weren't before you and Smith et al (poor old Al - always lumped in with the losers) got started on us - we sure are now... you sure know how to alienate ordinary, decent people .... stop spitting vinegar and try some honey instead...

Research = false conclusions based on deeply personal choice of interpretation about 'agriculture' etc, is NOT science....*
 

   


*I suppose you think that putting milk in your tea after instead of before makes a different chemical reaction, or that a bitch bred with a mongrel will never throw true again??  That's popular 'science' for you....

Oh, and i don't mind in the slightest if i alienate you or anyone remotely like you. I don't like you at all.

mothra wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 12:44pm:


That's a relief......

And if "botany is a science. Astronomy is a science. Archaeology is a science. So are genealogy, anthropology, linguistics, and arguably history." are all perverted and sidetracked to suit a preconceived agenda outcome...... they cease to be Science and become instead 'science'.

So a knowledge of which plants won't poison you, looking at the stars at night (are big and bright, deep in the heart of Texas), digging and finding a few pitiful remnants of middens, bones and such, comparing but only in a favourable light  one chosen culture with another, a bland statement of  over 250 different languages (some communication going on there  ), and a verbal history re-invented into fact by modern researchers.... are now signs of a vastly superior culture?

Well - who'd 've thunk it?

Why didn't the Boongs spear all the white invaders to death when they first arrived, they had the numbers! to lazy perhaps, or perhaps they had had enough of going walkabout for 40,000yrs.

Not many of them walk very far from an alcohol outlet these days even though they have hundreds of thousands acres allocated to them.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 1:21pm:


Vastly superior?

Shadowboxer.

Why didn't the Boongs spear all the white invaders to death when they first arrived, they had the numbers! to lazy perhaps, or perhaps they had had enough of going walkabout for 40,000yrs.

Not many of them walk very far from an alcohol outlet these days even though they have hundreds of thousands acres allocated to them.

Johnnie wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 1:32pm:


Good question, Matty. Do you know what you are?

You're curious. You're keen to know more, dear.

Mattyfisk wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 1:56pm:

Being experts with fire they could have smoked em out and then spear them, do you know why they didn't? Rum perhaps, you.
Maybe they dazzled them with a mirror.

It's strange why Mothball is on this forum; she seems to detest every member on here......not that I give a schit.....she really should confine herself to the Monkey Hole Forum with the other losers who cling together like flies on cr@p........

Johnnie wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 2:04pm:


Couldn't organise a piss-up at a barbecue....

rhino wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 3:26pm:



Firstly, i have made no claim other than that the history books are heavily biased. There is consensus of this amongst academics and really, anyone who's had a bit of a think about it.

As to your claims, what age did Captain Cook estimate Aboriginals lived to again? What was it you claimed a few pages back?

rhino wrote on May 10^th, 2019 at 3:26pm:



Firstly, i have made no claim other than that the history books are heavily biased. There is consensus of this amongst academics and really, anyone who's had a bit of a think about it.

As to your claims, what age did Captain Cook estimate Aboriginals lived to again? What was it you claimed a few pages back?

They didn't have the means to 'buggar it up'... not enough of them for a start - someone pointed that out days ago...

So now you want to rip down the hospitals, tear up the roads, remove the supermarkets, cut out to g'mint money, and return to a glorious past where it wasn't buggared up'?

Which nasty nation do you think will invade us then?

If it wasn't for the Nantucket USA Whalers - the British 'colony' here would have failed dismally.

The Aboriginal Calenders are far more accurate for Australia than the silly 4 seasons 'Western' one.