Brian Ross wrote on Apr 30^th, 2019 at 10:58pm:


Lunatics and wannabes?

Lunatics are already banned from gun ownership unless they can prove they are no longer a lunatic. In practice, this cannot happen. If you have PTSD you have it for life. You can only reclaim your ability to own a firearm if it was a misdiagnosis.

This covers the whole spectrum of mental illness.

This interestingly doesn't always apply to Australians. There is a documented case of a man who heard voices that were not real getting a gun licence. I have no idea if these voices were Jesus telling him to kill the neighbours cat, or Satan telling him to eat the neighbours children, or if it was an unknown telling him he was worthless, just that he heard voices.

Now what is this claim about wannabes?

My understanding of this term is someone who has aspirations to be like someone they hold in high regard, or someone who wishes they were someone else.

Now someone has a gun. They see themselves as maybe being able to save a life. They even get a Glock because that is what the cops use. This is wannabe/fantasist behavior. Why are these bad people according to you?

Everything I've seen from you is wannabe behavior.

You talk up your military service but counted blankets in ordnance. You would be called a poser by every single military person ever if you tried to assert your military legitimacy.

You also talk about studying military science to an extremely high level. You don't need this type of education. You have no need for it. It is self aggrandising. It is to ingratiate yourself and compare yourself with others who do need it. You are never going to need it for work or similar. It's an extravagance.

You are a wannabe of the first class. There is no mistaking it.

Is this statement against wannabes indicative of self loathing or is it a way to assert your false authenticity through the use of guile?

Brian Ross wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 1:17pm:


There is no psychological monitoring for Australian gun owners. At all. If you come to the attention of psychological authorities or submit yourself for evaluation, they can advise the police if they think you are not currently capable of being entrusted with a firearm. That's it.

Your statements are not reflective of the Australian population. What you are doing is called projection, where you are projecting your feelings on to others.

You feel that people who desire to have a gun for home defence are likely to use it to settle a grievance.

This is not statistically reflected. Your inference must be coming from how you feel, and then extrapolating that on to society as a whole.

Mortdooley wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 12:37am:



and still you want to arm those same people 

Brian Ross wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 4:45pm:


You lose.

GG

You win a forum of 10 active sock puppets and three active members.

You also win acclaim as a military poser.

I said you win. Give it a rest.

Thank You for the Propaganda clip 

Spatchcock wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 7:36pm:


Nothing wrong with gettin' yerself an edjucation, little chicken.   

Spatchcock wrote on May 1^st, 2019 at 9:09pm:




Run along, little chicken, run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where your antics are tolerated.