Brian Ross wrote on Apr 28
th, 2019 at 1:51pm:
Spatchcock wrote on Apr 28
th, 2019 at 9:47am:
Brian you don't know anything except quoted statistics.
The conversation started with you stating America was Australia's preferred submarine supplier but they don't make diesel boats so we went elsewhere. You also stated America is our preferred supplier for everything.
I pointed out this is not true. I pointed out we have nothing Navy made in the USA, except for like, a computer or two.
Now you are running with that saying everything is made in the USA.
Wrong. You obviously cannot read plain English, littlle chicken.
I have said that the weapon systems were primarily made in the USA. The US is our preferred supplier of weapons because well, we are in their good books and so get "preferred nation" rates for weapons.
The surface ship hulls recently have largely been European in origin - Germany, Spain and the UK. The Australian Government has been getting the "best of both worlds" simply because the US cannot supply a middle-powered navy with suitable hulls. It is however able to supply the RAN with advanced weapons and sensors...
Quote:you were proven to be wrong. AGAIN. Now instead of being humble and acknowledging wherever, you are twisting the argument to make yourself claim you are right and knowledgeable. AGAIN
you are wrong and know very little. This has been demonstrated. AGAIN.
And Brian, you are sprouting your opinion again. There js no justification of your assessment of the Attack class boat. It is just you staying I am wrong and you resting on your multiple claims of unproven military service and a Masters degree from ADFA, also unproven.
If you were in the military you would know the entire Army was trained for facing Vietnam style contingencies until 1992. It was extremely light infantry training against unconventional targets in thick scrub. This is applying the lessons learnt from Vietnam.
You are taking nonsense about the intended purpose of these Attack class boats. You are writing sentences that do not have any meaning related to this boat and using guile to appear knowledgeable. You know nothing.
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpgRun along, little chicken, your desperation is showing. I can hear your nursemaid calling for you to go back to your own patch of mud in the little kiddies' playground where you belong.
The conversation started with you stating Australia would prefer their regular supplier the USA to make the submarine but America doesn't make diesel submarines so we had to go elsewhere.
This is the vessel. Not the computer.
These are the facts. You are calling the last thirty years recent. Before this "recent event" of Euro ships they were British. There was like one class of US designed whatevers.
I don't understand why you keep setting yourself up like this.
America has never been our preferred supplier of anything. We even had German tanks. We had Belgian rifles and pistols. We were using different ammunition. We never had an over representation of American commonality in the ADF.
We also didn't have advanced anything.
Find out when our Navy got VLS. We have never been "small but advanced" nautically.
Start dealing facts please.