Is Kiwi Dave. 

So who is the puppeteer? I say it is a failed MRB Mod using a well known and notorious tag to infiltrate and confuse.

I posted this is the "OzPol should become more friendly Thread" in Relationships.




Quote:



Hmm.  Nicole has posted at the sewer that she is not this Kiwi Dave, despite the fact (which she will not dispute) that she was the original puppeteer of that muppet sock which caused the ultimate demise of any sense of democracy at the sewer where voting once had integrity.  'Kiwi Dave' set the precedent that voting can be rigged and FD was up to his eyeballs in it.  Down hill it went from there, and I used that precedent, I concede, as FD's Constitution urged everyone to do.

While I am not completely convinced that this Kiwi Dave is not Nicole, the more this Kiwi Dave posts, the more I move away from concluding it is Nicole or even Agnes.

That leaves just one contender who was aware of the history of the sewer and "Kiwi Dave" activities there, one who had bucket loads of tickets on herself about her genius, especially in philosophy and psychology.  If my memory of Board history holds true, this person was once the Mod of the Atheism MRB here, and then more latterly when Vic was doing his clean out of MRBs abandoned by the Mod, The Barnacle got the gig.

Anyone?

Care to 'fess up 'Kiwi Dave?'

See this Thread:

Link.

Quote:

PZ547 wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 4:00pm:


Well, I am the Mod here, appointed by FD after Agnes abandoned it many years ago for at least a year.  It was dormant.  It is now alive and very successful, but maybe not to everyone's liking.

I am happy that it be used for whatever including the relationships among Members here.  This is where that stuff is best dealt with instead of in other Threads.

That does not mean you, or anyone is precluded from posting whatever you like in some relationship context.  I have never imposed any limit on that.

Well that's good to know, Aussie

The main problem I see, and maybe I'm out of line, is ongoing argy-bargy stemming back into the mists of time.  Don't know about anyone else, but I'm not familiar with most of the past members or members of other forums.  It seems to the outside observer (me in this instance) like those madhouse tag-team wrestling venues where old animosities poison too many threads

it's just a forum, one of thousands out there.  No one has the capacity or will to keep tabs on what A said to B six months ago.  Each thread should stand on its own merit, imo.  People who disagree in one thread (forum wide) might be in agreement in another. Life's too short to hoard grievances unless they're important.  And what's important differs from person to person, I realise that, but most posters in the other boards let things go in the interests of flow and the forum generally

It's an opinion board and people's opinions might differ radically, depending on their mood at the time or what they might have learned since their last post

outright stirrers soon make themselves obvious and therefore unpopular.  Maybe we should leave things sort themselves out naturally and post as if for the first time, every time?

Gee, I see 'Kiwi Dave' is here.  Nothing to say or tell us 'Kiwi Dave?'  You wouldn't be the disgraced Mod who abandoned the MRB Atheism and now using the tag of another to be disruptive would you, 'Kiwi Dave?'

What say ye, Setanta and BO?  Will you tell us about any email or IP match across the Forums and internal here?  Or mayhap is that reserved only if you reckon I am involved.

Come on, be consistent.

Aussie wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 6:23pm:


Using your mod powers to spy on who is here reading and addressing them? I believe you told me that was unethical or something when I addressed Mothra when she was reading, yes? Now what do we call someone who says do as I say not do as I do?

Aussie wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 4:09pm:


No idea what you are on about and I'd prefer it if you left me out of your decades long dramas.

Aussie wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 7:10pm:


I thought you might pull that one but why if they were not reading here? It would be pointless as they would not see your post. You then post that they slink away. How could they slink away if they had not been here reading your posts? It would make no sense at all. You were addressing them here because you saw them reading here.

What do we call someone that says do as I say, not as I do?

Were you posting as Ivan Itch while you were suspended?

Aussie wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 7:21pm:


I don't believe you. You knew they were in here reading, there is no reason to post what you did if they were just online.

Nice deflection and ignore of the question of whether you posted as Ivan while you were suspended. I know why too. Not something you can answer honestly without asking to be suspended. How about I won't go gather the evidence if you come clean and I won't suspend you, though I cannot speak for anyone else. Are you man enough?

Aussie wrote on Apr 20^th, 2019 at 7:29pm:


Did you post as Ivan Itch while suspended?
A simple yes or no will suffice. I'm just asking you to be honest. Vic may or may not read this.

If I don't get that I may just have to search for all posts by Ivan and compare them to your suspension and refer it to Vic if I find you did.