freediver wrote on May 26
th, 2019 at 9:00pm:
Carbon pricing is the cheapest and most economically efficient way to reduce GHG emissions.
You have provided no evidence petal. Please try again.
freediver wrote on May 26
th, 2019 at 9:00pm:
You have not found an economist who disagrees with that.
No i have found links that say SOME don't agree. Some is MORE than ONE petal.
freediver wrote on May 26
th, 2019 at 9:00pm:
Labor introduced the cheapest and most economically efficient mechanism for reducing GHG emissions. The coalition discarded it, in favour of far more expensive options. They are populist economic vandals.
See item 1 above.
freediver wrote on May 26
th, 2019 at 9:00pm:
If you think the view of economists on carbon pricing has changed since that article was written, you are even more detached from reality than I thought.
I gave you quotes petal. You just don't like them. So in your tiny mind they must not exist.
As I said Economics relies on the questions asked and the assumptions used.
If you change the questions and/or you change the assumptions you change the modelled output.
BTW - you still haven't explained the eco tax that was 100% effective.