Setanta
Gold Member
Offline
\/ Peace man!
Posts: 15929
Northern NSW
Gender:
|
mothra wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:31pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:22pm: mothra wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:21pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:19pm: mothra wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:14pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:11pm: mothra wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 9:01pm: Setanta wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 8:18pm: Aussie wrote on Mar 18 th, 2019 at 8:03pm: Quote:How does an inanimate object take on an ideology and act of it's own volition? It obviously can't. The human who wields it can and does, the human with an ideology that sparks him to action. Like....an arsehole extremist, for example. Why don't we see Gandalf and many other Muslims here in Australia and NZ....gunning people down? Do you blame Christianity on the rape of kids by Priests.....or is that exclusively at the feet of the arsehole Priests personally and NOTHING to do with Christianity? You and yours call a bunch of people here racist white supremacists but we don't see them in the papers or TV killing people. So what do you have against them, when one "lone wolf" nutter goes off? Why do you hate on them for their ideology and yet defend Islam? It's hypocrisy. There is plenty about Islam that redeems itself from more odious elements of it's texts. I'm interested as to what you think is redeeming about white supremacy. Probably the same as Aussie says for Arabs. Arabia for the Arabs, Japan for the Japanese, Africa for Africansm China for the Chinese... Europa for everyone. The funny thing is only Europeans, those filthy white supremacists let the hoards in, yet they are the bad guys. To your first paragraph ... the horse has already bolted. So the redeeming feature of white supremacy is ....? To the second, perhaps white people don;t flock to tinted lands because we've stripped them bare and utterly rooted them? Now, do you have a sensible answer to my question? I don't think there is Mothra. I don't think any group is fundamentally superior. I quite agree. Now given that i see redeeming features to Islam, can you see how i am not, as you claimed, a hypocrite? Islam is an ideology not a person. It's a mind virus like every other ideology that seeks domination of others. So... No. That's a bullshit distinction that means absolutely nothing. What you're justifying is the abuse of people because of their faith ... although you call it an attack on their faith so you can assuage the guilt you at least should feel over your own complicity in prejudice. As Karnal would say, cunning. Fools the great unwashed on here and that's a bar low enough for you, these days. Yet you have dodged my question. That's okay ... i know what your answer must be. I'd be impressed if you were enlightened enough to adjust to fit what must be your new understanding. I have no idea how you come to that conclusion. I'm not and have never justified the abuse of people because of their "faith(mind infection)". What I have always stated is that ideologies are open for any and all criticism. You are the one saying people are their ideology and to question it is to question their existence. I've been clear in this forever. You know this, everyone should know this. You seem to be making the claim that ones ideology is one's self and to question it is abusing the person. Sorry, what one thinks is not sacred and is open to criticism, evaluation and even judgement.
|