Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25
Send Topic Print
Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list (Read 3480 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62635
Gender: female
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #105 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 2:58pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 2:10pm:
mothra wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 1:15pm:
This thread has nothing at all to do with petty squabbles and childish forum wars.

It is about members of THIS forum being concerned about the ever-rising levels of alarming hate-speech allowed here.

Something some of us have been warning about since before other unrelated forums even crossed our radars.


Not just hate speech.

There's also a notable rise in the number of posts which actively incite physical violence against members of this forum and/or members of minority groups.

One or two members here have serious psychological issues, and their online activity needs to be closely monitored by law enforcement agencies.

If they haven't already, I fear one of them will carry out an attack on innocent people.




And they'd be perfectly entitled to do so, Greggery.

Freeeeedom, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #106 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:09pm
 
.
What a pathetic rabble, like flies attracted to rot

Instead of clutching themselves in excitement as they orgarm to ideas of bringing down this forum

tell me this ----------- why don't they do something constructive with their own failed forum



answer: because they can only sow hate, destruction, divisions


they cannot create
they cannot maintain
they cannot build


in short:  losers


with the mental age of infants


fancy thinking they'll destroy this forum

and talk about self-defeating !



If this forum weren't here

where would they go ???


Trying to bite off their own noses to spite their faces

is the definition of lunacy



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 41328
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #107 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:17pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 2:10pm:
mothra wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 1:15pm:
This thread has nothing at all to do with petty squabbles and childish forum wars.

It is about members of THIS forum being concerned about the ever-rising levels of alarming hate-speech allowed here.

Something some of us have been warning about since before other unrelated forums even crossed our radars.


Not just hate speech.

There's also a notable rise in the number of posts which actively incite physical violence against members of this forum and/or members of minority groups.

One or two members here have serious psychological issues, and their online activity needs to be closely monitored by law enforcement agencies.

If they haven't already, I fear one of them will carry out an attack on innocent people.




Also seriously concerned about the rising tide of violent extremism in the world today - we all know what that's about.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #108 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:22pm
 


Greg, for a self-declared world traveler, you sure don't get around much

and manage to sound like a ten year old into the bargain

In fact that's where you should be -- in a fifth form forum

where you would also get your rrs kicked

(honestly can't believe the low-level drones they're paying to sow discord these days -- not even worth the peanuts they're paid)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 22104
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #109 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm
 
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:22pm:
Greg, for a self-declared world traveler, you sure don't get around much

and manage to sound like a ten year old into the bargain

In fact that's where you should be -- in a fifth form forum

where you would also get your rrs kicked

(honestly can't believe the low-level drones they're paying to sow discord these days -- not even worth the peanuts they're paid)


How cute.  Regale us all again with your tale about Meghan's fake pregnancy.

Cheesy
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 41328
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #110 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm
 
"The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 forbids hate speech on several grounds. The Act makes it "unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person, or of some or all of the people in the group."

So Islam and Islamism aren't colours or races or nationalities or even ethnicities etc - they are a religious cult(s), and thus the Racial Discrimination Act definition of hate speech does not apply.

There is no 'hate speech' in discussing the very real possibilities that some Muslims may attack others,  and that some non-Muslims may attack Muslims as a result of this incident in Christchurch, and certainly none in any individual saying that he/she would defend self and family in the event of being attacked.

Topsy turvy non-reasoning leads people to the position of calling a statement of intent to self-defend as 'hate speech'.

Who here has been actively advocating violence against anyone - leave out offers of self-defence.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #111 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:26pm
 
Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:22pm:
Greg, for a self-declared world traveler, you sure don't get around much

and manage to sound like a ten year old into the bargain

In fact that's where you should be -- in a fifth form forum

where you would also get your rrs kicked

(honestly can't believe the low-level drones they're paying to sow discord these days -- not even worth the peanuts they're paid)


How cute.  Regale us all again with your tale about Meghan's fake pregnancy.

Cheesy




ooooooooooohhh

gotcha, huh?

Sting, did it?

You standing in for Greg now?
Or did you forget to switch socks?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 22104
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #112 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:29pm
 
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:26pm:
Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:22pm:
Greg, for a self-declared world traveler, you sure don't get around much

and manage to sound like a ten year old into the bargain

In fact that's where you should be -- in a fifth form forum

where you would also get your rrs kicked

(honestly can't believe the low-level drones they're paying to sow discord these days -- not even worth the peanuts they're paid)


How cute.  Regale us all again with your tale about Meghan's fake pregnancy.

Cheesy




ooooooooooohhh

gotcha, huh?

Sting, did it?

You standing in for Greg now?
Or did you forget to switch socks?




No...just thought it was timely to remind the Forum you believe that pregnancy is fake.  You even have fake photos to prove you claim.  And yet...it is some other member who ought to be in a Forum for Five Year olds!

Cheesy

   
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #113 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:31pm
 
Ye Grappler wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
"The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 forbids hate speech on several grounds. The Act makes it "unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person, or of some or all of the people in the group."

So Islam and Islamism aren't colours or races or nationalities or even ethnicities etc - they are a religious cult(s), and thus the Racial Discrimination Act definition of hate speech does not apply.

There is no 'hate speech' in discussing the very real possibilities that some Muslims may attack others,  and that some non-Muslims may attack Muslims as a result of this incident in Christchurch, and certainly none in any individual saying that he/she would defend self and family in the event of being attacked.

Topsy turvy non-reasoning leads people to the position of calling a statement of intent to self-defend as 'hate speech'.

Who here has been actively advocating violence against anyone - leave out offers of self-defence.



None of it is worth the paper it's printed on

Some people are intimidated, others are not

Authorities playing a dangerous game which they'd rather remain out of in the interests of their own survival

unless they want to be exposed as causing the problems via orchestrated wars

and the participation of Australia in matters which under no circumstances could be said to be, or be seen to be, any of Australia's concern

Puppet politicians brought all these problems to our shores

and Aussies and voters alike are very aware of that


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #114 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:32pm
 
Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:29pm:
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:26pm:
Aussie wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:22pm:
Greg, for a self-declared world traveler, you sure don't get around much

and manage to sound like a ten year old into the bargain

In fact that's where you should be -- in a fifth form forum

where you would also get your rrs kicked

(honestly can't believe the low-level drones they're paying to sow discord these days -- not even worth the peanuts they're paid)


How cute.  Regale us all again with your tale about Meghan's fake pregnancy.

Cheesy




ooooooooooohhh

gotcha, huh?

Sting, did it?

You standing in for Greg now?
Or did you forget to switch socks?




No...just thought it was timely to remind the Forum you believe that pregnancy is fake.  You even have fake photos to prove you claim.  And yet...it is some other member who ought to be in a Forum for Five Year olds!

Cheesy

   



I think you put your big mouth and foot in it as usual Greg-Aussie

the vast majority are fully conversant with the fake pregnancy and have seen the photos and videos and are very vocal in their disgust online, at work, in buses and over fences

stick to what you know and quit trying to divert because you have never been good at it (or at anything else in my observation)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 41328
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #115 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:51pm
 
.. and the strand just gets crazier and crazier as we go along....  anyone with a good comment?

...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 22104
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #116 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:51pm
 
The 'vast majority....'

...
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 41328
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #117 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:52pm
 
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:31pm:
Ye Grappler wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
"The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 forbids hate speech on several grounds. The Act makes it "unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person, or of some or all of the people in the group."

So Islam and Islamism aren't colours or races or nationalities or even ethnicities etc - they are a religious cult(s), and thus the Racial Discrimination Act definition of hate speech does not apply.

There is no 'hate speech' in discussing the very real possibilities that some Muslims may attack others,  and that some non-Muslims may attack Muslims as a result of this incident in Christchurch, and certainly none in any individual saying that he/she would defend self and family in the event of being attacked.

Topsy turvy non-reasoning leads people to the position of calling a statement of intent to self-defend as 'hate speech'.

Who here has been actively advocating violence against anyone - leave out offers of self-defence.



None of it is worth the paper it's printed on

Some people are intimidated, others are not

Authorities playing a dangerous game which they'd rather remain out of in the interests of their own survival

unless they want to be exposed as causing the problems via orchestrated wars

and the participation of Australia in matters which under no circumstances could be said to be, or be seen to be, any of Australia's concern

Puppet politicians brought all these problems to our shores

and Aussies and voters alike are very aware of that





That's one of the reasons people are mighty pissed off with them nowadays.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5631
Gender: male
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #118 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 4:02pm
 
Ye Grappler wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:52pm:
PZ547 wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:31pm:
Ye Grappler wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
"The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 forbids hate speech on several grounds. The Act makes it "unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person, or of some or all of the people in the group."

So Islam and Islamism aren't colours or races or nationalities or even ethnicities etc - they are a religious cult(s), and thus the Racial Discrimination Act definition of hate speech does not apply.

There is no 'hate speech' in discussing the very real possibilities that some Muslims may attack others,  and that some non-Muslims may attack Muslims as a result of this incident in Christchurch, and certainly none in any individual saying that he/she would defend self and family in the event of being attacked.

Topsy turvy non-reasoning leads people to the position of calling a statement of intent to self-defend as 'hate speech'.

Who here has been actively advocating violence against anyone - leave out offers of self-defence.



None of it is worth the paper it's printed on

Some people are intimidated, others are not

Authorities playing a dangerous game which they'd rather remain out of in the interests of their own survival

unless they want to be exposed as causing the problems via orchestrated wars

and the participation of Australia in matters which under no circumstances could be said to be, or be seen to be, any of Australia's concern

Puppet politicians brought all these problems to our shores

and Aussies and voters alike are very aware of that





That's one of the reasons people are mighty pissed off with them nowadays.


then they top it off by criminalising possession of video and/or photograhic footage of the allged NZ massacre !  Ten years jail time !  For possessing footage of an alleged incident which might have taken part right under witnesses noses as they were filming something else

'Hand that footage in to the authorities and do not look at it or show anyone' (until we've had a chance to bugger around with what will become the official footage)

yeah, sounds kosher
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62635
Gender: female
Re: Ozpolitic should be on an anti-terror watch list
Reply #119 - Mar 16th, 2019 at 4:44pm
 
Ye Grappler wrote on Mar 16th, 2019 at 3:25pm:
"The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 forbids hate speech on several grounds. The Act makes it "unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person, or of some or all of the people in the group."

So Islam and Islamism aren't colours or races or nationalities or even ethnicities etc - they are a religious cult(s), and thus the Racial Discrimination Act definition of hate speech does not apply.

There is no 'hate speech' in discussing the very real possibilities that some Muslims may attack others,  and that some non-Muslims may attack Muslims as a result of this incident in Christchurch, and certainly none in any individual saying that he/she would defend self and family in the event of being attacked.

Topsy turvy non-reasoning leads people to the position of calling a statement of intent to self-defend as 'hate speech'.

Who here has been actively advocating violence against anyone - leave out offers of self-defence.


I agree, Grappler. It's racist to call us bigots and racists and all that nonsense. It's a form of censorship.

You can call Muslims whatever you want. Islam is not a race.

It's completely racist to call decent white people haters. It's even illegal, as you've shown. Whitey has every right to defend himself against the Muselman, which is all he's doing in New Zealand. Whitey wants to take out the trash, and there's absolutely nothing racist about it at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25
Send Topic Print