freediver wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 7:47pm:


Perhaps. My understanding of the distinction you were trying to draw was between saying 'any and every new muslim immigrant personally increases the security risk' and 'an increase in muslim immigration in general necessarily increases the risk - based on the idea that in all muslim populations contain a certain proportion of a subset that is a security threat - and therefore that subset would necessarily increase' - is that correct?

If so, then I maintain she meant, or at least implied the former, when she stated that the size of the muslim population in and of itself determines the terrorist threat level, and therefore formed the justification of her call to ban muslim immigration.

There was no nuance there, no attempt to distinguish any such subsets, or consider any other factors that may contribute to the risk level (in contrast to Bolt). Whatever you say she might have been thinking (but didn't bother to articulate), her words taken at face value literally say to any peace loving, law abiding muslim who intends to immigrate to Australia - *YOU* personally will make Australia less safe if you move here. Not to mention the message it sends to existing muslim residents - since you contribute to a muslim population that is apparently too high - you too personally make Australia a more dangerous place.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 8:26pm:


You tried to boil a general observation down to a specific statement about an individual.

Bobby. wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 8:34pm:


It's pretty stupid, considering the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Australia (and the rest of the western world) have had absolutely nothing to do with Islam.

Bobby. wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 9:10pm:


No.

It's an indisputable fact.

The vast majority of terrorist attacks in Australia (and the rest of the western world) have had absolutely nothing to do with Islam.

Why do you continue to lie, Bobby?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 9:13pm:


More Trollop from under the bridge.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 2:33pm:


Andrew Bolt? How fascinating. But the statistics still stand. Islamic terror is more common where Muslums are in greater numbers. Viz, France.

issuevoter wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2019 at 9:33pm:


Most terrorism in France has nothing to do with Muslims.

In fact, in all of Europe, Islamic terrorism only accounts for 16% of all attacks.

gandalf wrote Reply #57 - Yesterday at 7:14pm
Quote:


Dueteronomy 1:1 These be the words which Moses spake unto all Israel on this side Jordan in the wilderness, in the plain over against the Red sea, between Paran, and Tophel, and Laban, and Hazeroth, and Dizahab.

Moses was speaking as a man who preached what mankind accepted as the Mosaic law of the day in those times. (about 3500 years ago)

Yes civilization was cruel and barbaric in those times, the ancient Egyptians used all kinds of torture as their punishment (skinning people alive was a favourite), look at the way the Romans tortured people in the coliseums letting animals tear defenceless humans to bits while still alive, soaking people in tar and setting them alight, crucifying people, all for spectator sport, look at the human sacrifice of those who worshipped baal, mothers who willingly had their first child burnt to death as a sacrifice to baal, look at the human sacrifice of the Aztecs etc.etc.etc..


You asked? Were people different in those times?

I ask, are you fair dinkum? You don't know the difference between civilization in those times and now?

Yes Christ was the one who ushered in the extinction of Mosaic law.

The N.T. teaches that the law achieved nothing, that man cannot be saved or justified by the law.

You are desperately looking for an out for the pure evil in the qur'an gandi, by continually trying to tell us that the ancient outdated & revoked Mosaic law is somehow still relevant.

Your *book* tells you to rape,crucify, torture and kill people gandi, that's the sole reason we have islamic terrorism today 2019.

It's up to you and others, to renounce the multitude of evil in your book gandi (for that is the only way you will ever defeat islamic terrorism).

But that puts you between a rock and a hard spot, you are told that the book with all its' evil intent / content is the unchangeable infallible words of allah.

So instead of doing the right thing and repudiating the evil in the book, you continually look for excuses.

The truth is that muhammad took muslims backwards, you are no further advanced in human rights than the ancient Aztecs, Romans, Egyptians, the worshipers of baal, you're right there with them gandi.

Your problem is exclusively a muslim / islam one gandi, it's got absolutely nothing to do with outdated Mosaic law, Hindu law, Buddhist law, Christianity, witchcraft, paganism etc. etc (You name it here).

Your qur'an is the problem gandi, you'll never solve your predicament until you denounce the evil in it.