Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Feb 13
th, 2019 at 2:15pm:
PZ547 wrote on Feb 13
th, 2019 at 1:51pm:
Quoting Grappler:
Quote:
Less than 5% of callouts to police to attend 'family violence incidents' result in a charge.... yet somehow the courts are permitted to sanction ONE side of any dispute without reference to facts, and purely on the wish of the whiner, who may be motivated by any number of things, but certainly scarcely ever by reason
You say:
'Less than 5% of callouts to police to attend family violence incidents result in a charge'
You say:
'Courts are permitted to sanction ONE side of any dispute ...' and then you carry on with your personal interpretation as to the motives of the individual complaining about DV
Lot of definitions for 'sanction'
I'm going to accept first off the rank i.e., 'threat. threat of penalty'
Then we try to put the DV situation into some sort of perspective
As of 2016:
Quote:
Australian police dealt with a domestic violence matter every 2 minutes
Also in 2016:
Quote:
Australian police deal with 5000 domestic violence matter a week
and it adds that domestic violence matters in 2016 were 'up' 7% in that year, so obviously 7% more than the year previous
I don't have figures for 2018 -- look them up if you like
Obviously, those sanctioned and or charged for domestic violence offences were NOT put off by saturation advertising or public exposure -- ignored it in fact -- resulting in an increase in DV incidents by 7% in one year
If we multiply 5000 DV incidents per week by 52 weeks, it amounts to 260,000 DV incident per year from a population of roughly 25 million, a good proportion of whom are children
Then we have this, also from 2016:
Quote:
Police union warns officers are at 'breaking point' —
May 29, 2018 - A 2016 Productivity Commission report puts police numbers at more than 70,000, with NSW representing the largest share, at more than 19,000 officers. That is around 200 officers per 100,000 people
.
Let's see that again:
200 officers per 100,000 people
to attend to murders
attempted murders
robberies
assorted violence
rapes
traffic
etc
You choose to overlook the point that 'dv laws' are NOT about violence - they are about complaints. Since they do not encompass any genuine offence from the outset - under no circumstances should anyone be sent to prison over them.
There are other laws that handle that.
You talk rubbish about divorce - near 90% of such things are initiated by women for reasons having nothing to do with violence - then the system is often gamed to give them advantage. The fact that such things can happen at all is sufficient reason to abolish these nonsenses.
You do NOT 'arbitrate and prevent' ANYTHING by slapping one person with the direct violence of dragging them into a court and handing them a sanction without reason while whole-heaertedly accdepting anyt In that case you are the CAUSE of the problem - not its solution - and no amount of bullying and bullshit will alter that reality.
Keep thinking... you cannot win this by waffling on about some mythical Mickey pissed in the garage - that is NOT what normally occurs in these things.
Women initiate 62% of DV incidents, far more often than men using weapons such as knives etc - and suffer 62% of the injuries as a result. Simply saying that men are bigger etc does not take away from women the responsibility to not behave like a child, and for her own actions. To do so is often to blame the victim for defending self.
Go look up what passes for 'domestic violence' - but ONLY when it is claimed by women. Essentially it is anything at all, without reference to facts.
You're not worth the time or effort
You cannot be reasoned with
Keep pushing your barrow. It will finish you off if you're not careful
All the way through, you damn women, blame women. That's not logical
Just face it -- because it comes through everything you write very clearly -- you have it in for women. You're like the self-righteous parent for whom the entire school and teachers are wrong for holding precious little Johnny to account
News reports tell the story. And people read them. You, however, obviously interpret evidence differently to everyone else
Ok. Sit and stew in it
No laws will change due to your biased input
It obviously enrages you when some bully comes home to dish it out to his wife, kids, parents, same sex partner, dog, etc. and is held to account
Strange he managed to control his rage at work, on the highway or in public transport on the way home
managed to control his rage when in the pub and surrounded by guys who'd delight in pushing his head in
managed to control his rage when waving to neighbours or phoning his parents
But 'lost control' at the sight of his wife, kids, partner -- the captive audience behind the front door
suddenly it's the wife, kids, dog which 'provoked' him
heard it hundreds of times. We all have
If DV laws weren't necessary, they wouldn't exist. No one wants to listen to that poo or deal with it all day
anyway, off you go, tilting at windmills
'Radicalise' those mens groups. Maybe they'll all take off their shirts and carry placards
Have a go at reversing divorce law too, while you're at it. Get those women back in line