Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Julia Banks Refuses To Name Liberal Bullies (Read 2609 times)
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Julia Banks Refuses To Name Liberal Bullies
Reply #45 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 9:20am
 
Pedro Curevo wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 8:07am:
Workplace bullying mostly does not happen in plain view of others, it happens privately and in offices, one on one as in these political cases which does make that difficult to prove on a individual basis.

It makes workplace bullying a bit like sexual harassment. Some perpetrators may engage in both.

Where bullying differs is that it is more likely that workplace bullying may happen in front of other people, or groups of people may bully one victim.

Pedro Curevo wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 8:07am:
There are men in the LNP that need to go or the party will not change, a stagnant pond of dimwits, Abbott being one of them as they are not working to the benefit of the country they are solely working for the mining industry or just big business, they have forgotten they are there in politics for the benefit of all.

The Coalition needs generational change, flushing the remaining dregs of the Howard government out of politics.

Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Julia Banks Refuses To Name Liberal Bullies
Reply #46 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 10:08am
 
Bam wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 9:08am:
matty wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 12:35am:
Bam wrote on Feb 6th, 2019 at 7:23pm:
Why should I waste time addressing questions based on lies and fallacies when you don't even know the difference between fact and opinion?


Maybe because you throw around this like it’s true. Provide one, just one, example where I have confused fact and opinion.


An OP full of unsubstantiated opinions.
Why does Labor not believe in fairness/equality?
Quote:
why does Labor believe that those who work for a living, who work hard to support their family, and spend and save their money wisely, should be penalised whilst who do not, and refuse to work, get given that extra income that those who do work hard, get?

No evidence offered to substantiate any of this. More examples in the OP omitted for space reasons. Pure, unadulterated, fabricated OPINION.

A rather long bow to draw. No actual proof of your general assertion offered.
Proof that the left does not care about refugees.

Voicing an opinion about hypothetical politicians.
Craig Kelly likely to defect from Liberals
Quote:
there is further and further likelihood of [Craig Kelly] being dumped from his seat of Hughes, ... for a left-wing hack.


Confusing unproven allegations with court-determined facts in the kind of reckless post that could turn out to be very expensive for you if the candidate's lawyers ever found it.
Greens candidate RAPED woman

A rather bold assertion backed with very flimsy evidence. (Youtube videos? Really?)
100% proof that we don't have free speech

Another of your opinionated rants after a drive "through the western suburbs of Sydney".
Abbott is right, we need to reduce immigration

That should do for a start.


Well done Bam....I am starting to believe this Matty dickhead is a right wing hypocrite of the lowest order....Perhaps it is Scott Morrison who is proven to support liars or cover up bullying....Either way he has been exposed for the dickhead he is???

Smiley Smiley Smiley

Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89156
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Julia Banks Refuses To Name Liberal Bullies
Reply #47 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 11:02am
 
stunspore wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 6:08am:
matty wrote on Feb 7th, 2019 at 12:48am:
Bam wrote on Feb 6th, 2019 at 7:45pm:
matty wrote on Feb 5th, 2019 at 11:40pm:
How she can name something that doesn’t exist? Politics is robust. I am NO fan of the Liberal party, but I am not going to believe in something with not a shred of evidence.

Funny how the lefties on this thread just take it as a given that it must have happened. If it were Labor you would be demanding proof, but when it comes to the Libs no evidence required.

Funny how you're asserting without proof that it did not exist, while in the same post you're whining about "lefties" claiming it must have happened.

What's really sad is that you can't even see your blatant hypocrisy. You think you're allowed to make remarks like "something that doesn’t exist" as if only you are correct, but others aren't allowed to hold a different view? Oh, really?

Banks hasn't named names. That doesn't mean anything. Not having sufficient opportunity to name names under parliamentary privilege, keeping quiet about the matter on legal advice, not wishing to antagonise some friends in the Liberals, the tabloid media haven't offered enough money yet for an "exclusive" story. All are plausible alternatives to its not happening at all.

The only assertions I have made concern parliamentary privilege. I don't know if it's true or not, and I have made no clear assertions either way. We'll see how it plays out.


Look, I can’t say that it did or did not happen. Neither can you.

However, there is no opinion to be had here. Either it did happen or it did not happen. An opinion is not really relevant here.

What I am saying is that neither Banks not O’Dwyer nor Gichui, has provided a shred of evidence of bullying. Not one.

I am sick to death of people on the left treading allegations as gospel, just see Phil and Greggy here. The same case with Kavanaugh recently, and Abbott allegedly bashing a woman.

Strange how you say nothing about that...


No different than a rape victim not providing "one shred of evidence" according to Matty.  Or maybe accusing someone working with children a pedo - but you, in case they are innocent, let them keep working with them.






You do realise that guilt by accusation is illegal under our system of Law, don't you?

So now you're demanding that anyone accused be condemned and punished immediately without trial?  Your kind are very dangerous people....... they are called Nazis and Stalinists.... and they've killed countless millions in one way or another......

Footnote:-  I warned the 'law reform commission of nsw' in 1992 that the introduction of their kind of 'domestic violence law' would tend to destroy the rule of law in this nation by creating an environment in which anyone accused was automatically considered to be guilty, and even if not proven to be so, must suffer some sanction by a 'court'......... I should receive a prophet's and whistle blower's fee....

No wonder this nation is on the borderline for revolt, and no wonder violence is rising....  The Armies Of Societal Night are being heard, one at a time..... the voices of the Silenced Majority are screaming without sound in the dark ...

If nobody hears a person scream, does that mean their pain does not exist?

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Julia Banks Refuses To Name Liberal Bullies
Reply #48 - Feb 7th, 2019 at 11:08am
 
Either the Liberal Party are covering up bullying or senior members of the party are bald faced liars....Either way the Liberal Party cannot be trusted???

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print