Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Wharfies Vote To Strike Over Pay And Conditions (Read 2597 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57150
Here
Gender: male
Re: Wharfies Vote To Strike Over Pay And Conditions
Reply #60 - Jan 15th, 2019 at 7:26pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 15th, 2019 at 11:20am:
whiteknight wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 6:12pm:
Wharfies vote to strike over 'attack' on pay and conditions   Huh

14 January 2019
The Age


Hutchison Ports is locked in a fresh dispute with its unionised workers in Sydney and Brisbane.

Hutchison Ports, which lost tens of millions of dollars in the past financial year, is seeking to drive down costs at its Australian port operations.

Its existing wage agreement pays waterfront workers an average of $150,000 in Sydney and $130,000 in Brisbane for working 30 to 33 hours a week, once allowances are factored in, as well as 12 per cent superannuation.





The company can't keep running at a loss it will go out of business, do the unions want to shut it down?


$150,000 a year for 30-33 hours work sounds like a nice rort, these workers will be making nothing if that company goes out of business.





A lot of these people are casuals, they don't know if they have a days work till they get a phone call the day before, Their shift may start at 11 pm or 4 am. then they may stay home waiting for the next phone call.

Yes they get paid ok when shifts are available but it is a brutal life.

Oh And the numbers given here are really exaggerated, they get paid well but nothing like what this is saying.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57150
Here
Gender: male
Re: Wharfies Vote To Strike Over Pay And Conditions
Reply #61 - Jan 15th, 2019 at 7:35pm
 
minarchist wrote on Jan 15th, 2019 at 11:02am:
Gees, I'd love to be earning $150,000 pa and work 33 hours per week. That's about $87.40 per hour. A $10 per hour reduction in wages puts them at $77.40 per hour, or $133,000 pa if they still worked a 33 hour work week. Yes it's a significant pay cut, but come on, what are these guys doing on a daily basis that justifies such high wages? Even if I got my RPEQ engineering certification I'd still be earning less per hour than these guys.

Bring in the robots I say.


Quote:
Bring in the robots I say


That is what Corrigan done in the late 90's. 4 or 5 robotic cranes at port Botany - don't know it they are still there but it turned out that the workers out performed them every time.

Not only that but there were some containers that they couldn't lift or worse were likely to drop.

Half a billion dollars worth of cranes have stood unused on the wharves for 20 years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 80217
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Wharfies Vote To Strike Over Pay And Conditions
Reply #62 - Jan 15th, 2019 at 7:47pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 15th, 2019 at 11:20am:
whiteknight wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 6:12pm:
Wharfies vote to strike over 'attack' on pay and conditions   Huh

14 January 2019
The Age


Hutchison Ports is locked in a fresh dispute with its unionised workers in Sydney and Brisbane.

Hutchison Ports, which lost tens of millions of dollars in the past financial year, is seeking to drive down costs at its Australian port operations.

Its existing wage agreement pays waterfront workers an average of $150,000 in Sydney and $130,000 in Brisbane for working 30 to 33 hours a week, once allowances are factored in, as well as 12 per cent superannuation.





The company can't keep running at a loss it will go out of business, do the unions want to shut it down?


$150,000 a year for 30-33 hours work sounds like a nice rort, these workers will be making nothing if that company goes out of business.





If Hutchison go out of business - someone else will pick up the contract... who do you imagine they are going to employ?  Untrained newbies straight off the street?  Bring in foreign wetback scab labour?

If a major company is losing money - they need to look at their overall activity and find out where they are losing - and if it is because they have undercut on contracts - their principal contractor (port 'corporation' - is it owned by Chinks these days?  Ah - the joys of privatisation and sellout!!) needs to be brought back to the table by a (gasps) union of waterfront firms..... aided by the WWF ...

Many of these companies/corporations go out backwards because they 'diversify' into what their accountants tell them are a 'good deal', and put their money into other kinds of activity other than their core activity (core v non-core - here we go again).

Interestingly - when the inevitable disaster ensues... the workers, lower management (non-tenured and without a shares portfolio in the company) and shareholders may suffer .. but the board will not.....  Huh  Huh  Huh

They board etc will go down with the ship, saluting all the way and weighed down by a huge mass of gold... then into a submarine to make their escape... and will re-surface again in another guise with a few lazy mill/bill just lying around.

Look at Rodney Adler.... Christopher Skase ... Alan Bond... Slim Mehajer..

The government and its lackey agencies, as well as the banks, have learned NOTHING since the heady days of Bondie's Great Escape with $50+ million....  Skasey's Run with $25+ million... Slim's Pickings with at least $10+million, and Adler's who knows amount... but enough to spend $5m refurbishing the garage on his waterfront Eastern Suburbs home in Sydney.

Pillars of the community all!!
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print