Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
Black = bad (Read 12730 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 45560
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #120 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 1:12pm
 
Valkie wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 12:34pm:
It's no secret that young aboriginal girls are nearly all raped before puberty in aboriginal settlements

That STDs are making a com act at plague like proportions among aboriginals

That children as young as 10 have one or more STDs

But we must honour the great noble savage...... not


Most white girls in Sydney/Melbourne are 'raped' or seduced at a young age by Aboriginals (many in Western Sydney), Sudanese (playing the 'African American' sex tool) and other non-white groups who breed 'earlier' than White people. Nearly every 'white' 20's female in the Cities is hitched to an Indian or Chinese male 'Student' - for many reasons, but mostly 'Visa' reasons.

White girls have got it good. Heaps of non-white males to choose from and all willing to 'speed up the breeding process'.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91852
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #121 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 2:25pm
 
Valkie wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 12:34pm:
It's no secret that young aboriginal girls are nearly all raped before puberty in aboriginal settlements

That STDs are making a com act at plague like proportions among aboriginals

That children as young as 10 have one or more STDs

But we must honour the great noble savage...... not


77 times the crime, squalor and retardedness of Whitey, it's just a fact.

Homo had one of them at his school.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91852
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #122 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 2:27pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 1:12pm:
Valkie wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 12:34pm:
It's no secret that young aboriginal girls are nearly all raped before puberty in aboriginal settlements

That STDs are making a com act at plague like proportions among aboriginals

That children as young as 10 have one or more STDs

But we must honour the great noble savage...... not


Most white girls in Sydney/Melbourne are 'raped' or seduced at a young age by Aboriginals (many in Western Sydney), Sudanese (playing the 'African American' sex tool) and other non-white groups who breed 'earlier' than White people. Nearly every 'white' 20's female in the Cities is hitched to an Indian or Chinese male 'Student' - for many reasons, but mostly 'Visa' reasons.

White girls have got it good. Heaps of non-white males to choose from and all willing to 'speed up the breeding process'.


That's their sinister grooming gangs.

They get 77 times more girls (abuse victims) than Whitey, but that's the mean, not the risk.

Do you have the proper breakdown, Rhino?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #123 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 2:32pm
 
Is this song borderline racist?

Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130891
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #124 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 4:33pm
 
Gordon wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 2:32pm:
Is this song borderline racist?



It's about a gun, and it was written by a black man.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 45560
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #125 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 5:57pm
 
Black Men get 'free sex' from White Americans.

Black Men get 'free money' from White Australians.


YOU TELL ME WHO IS THE 'SUPERIOR' RACE!?

Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15851
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #126 - Jan 13th, 2019 at 6:35pm
 
Gordon wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 2:32pm:
Is this song borderline racist?



In my version I replace bambalam with "in Tabulam".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91852
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #127 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 11:31am
 
Where did Homo go?

He hasn't been this quiet in a while.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8344
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #128 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 11:33am
 
...
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #129 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 12:52pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 10:59am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 6:00am:
Just because there are a lot of indigenous ppl in jail doesn't mean they committed crimes. It means they are targeted by the police. Remember when Joe bjelke put all of them he could find in the black hole for the Commonwealth games? Who would think that doesn't still happen? The crimes they have committed are likely vagrancy related.

Spot


Spot on Spot, pardon the pun.

Courts discriminate shockingly against Aboriginal people.

Offences that would gain a warning or a good behaviour bond for a non-Aboriginal often result in jail time for Aboriginals.

"Whites" get off with a warning far more often than "blacks".

That's a fact.



I'll just post the summary, the whole study is very interesting.

Summary

This paper reports the findings from statistical analyses comparing the probability of receiving a prison sentence by Indigenous status in the lower courts of South Australia and New South Wales over an 11 year period (1998 to 2008). The primary aim was to identify whether there was a relationship between Indigenous status and imprisonment after controlling for other factors known to impact sentencing decisions. It was found that:

For each year, adjusting for social background, past and present criminality and court processing factors reduced the initial baseline differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

Overall, Indigenous defendants were more likely to receive a prison sentence, compared with non-Indigenous defendants in comparable circumstances in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

The pattern of disparity over time varied between the two jurisdictions of New South Wales and South Australia. In South Australia, in the period pre-2001, there was evidence of parity and even leniency. However, in more recent years, Indigenous offenders were more likely to receive a prison sentence. By contrast, Indigenous offenders had higher odds of imprisonment throughout the entire period in New South Wales.


So there is some support for the differential involvement hypothesis across the entire time period, but some negative disparity remains. More importantly, the analysis suggests that the gap in the decision to imprison in the lower courts between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders may well be increasing in both jurisdictions.

https://i.imgur.com/tkRW8ex.jpg

Figure 1 Independent effect of Indigenous status on the likelihood of an imprisonment order in adult lower courts (South Australia and New South Wales) by year

Note: Odds ratios reported. The adjusted odds ratios are estimated from a logistic regression model that controls for sex, age at disposition, prior history, offence seriousness, presence of multiple conviction counts, guilty plea and not released on bail.
The dashed red line represents equal odds, or parity. Odds ratios below this line indicate increasing leniency in favour of Indigenous offenders; odds ratios above this line indicate increasing harshness toward Indigenous offenders

www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/441-460/tandi447.html


I see you drank the Koolaid but unfortunately those statistics arent telling the real story, repeat offenders are being dealt with more harshly by the courts. Unfortunately most happen to be Aboriginals because they never break the crime cycle, they consider prison to be a part of the social security system and are not interested in rehabilitation. If you examine cases on an individual base then Aboriginals are actually dealt with more leniently for the same crimes, particularly in regards to sexual assault offences.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8344
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #130 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 2:13pm
 
Try again:

For each year, adjusting for social background, past and present criminality and court processing factors reduced the initial baseline differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26458
Australia
Re: Black = bad
Reply #131 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 5:06pm
 
rhino wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 12:52pm:
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 10:59am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 6:00am:
Just because there are a lot of indigenous ppl in jail doesn't mean they committed crimes. It means they are targeted by the police. Remember when Joe bjelke put all of them he could find in the black hole for the Commonwealth games? Who would think that doesn't still happen? The crimes they have committed are likely vagrancy related.

Spot


Spot on Spot, pardon the pun.

Courts discriminate shockingly against Aboriginal people.

Offences that would gain a warning or a good behaviour bond for a non-Aboriginal often result in jail time for Aboriginals.

"Whites" get off with a warning far more often than "blacks".

That's a fact.



I'll just post the summary, the whole study is very interesting.

Summary

This paper reports the findings from statistical analyses comparing the probability of receiving a prison sentence by Indigenous status in the lower courts of South Australia and New South Wales over an 11 year period (1998 to 2008). The primary aim was to identify whether there was a relationship between Indigenous status and imprisonment after controlling for other factors known to impact sentencing decisions. It was found that:

For each year, adjusting for social background, past and present criminality and court processing factors reduced the initial baseline differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

Overall, Indigenous defendants were more likely to receive a prison sentence, compared with non-Indigenous defendants in comparable circumstances in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

The pattern of disparity over time varied between the two jurisdictions of New South Wales and South Australia. In South Australia, in the period pre-2001, there was evidence of parity and even leniency. However, in more recent years, Indigenous offenders were more likely to receive a prison sentence. By contrast, Indigenous offenders had higher odds of imprisonment throughout the entire period in New South Wales.


So there is some support for the differential involvement hypothesis across the entire time period, but some negative disparity remains. More importantly, the analysis suggests that the gap in the decision to imprison in the lower courts between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders may well be increasing in both jurisdictions.

https://i.imgur.com/tkRW8ex.jpg

Figure 1 Independent effect of Indigenous status on the likelihood of an imprisonment order in adult lower courts (South Australia and New South Wales) by year

Note: Odds ratios reported. The adjusted odds ratios are estimated from a logistic regression model that controls for sex, age at disposition, prior history, offence seriousness, presence of multiple conviction counts, guilty plea and not released on bail.
The dashed red line represents equal odds, or parity. Odds ratios below this line indicate increasing leniency in favour of Indigenous offenders; odds ratios above this line indicate increasing harshness toward Indigenous offenders

www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/441-460/tandi447.html


I see you drank the Koolaid but unfortunately those statistics arent telling the real story, repeat offenders are being dealt with more harshly by the courts. Unfortunately most happen to be Aboriginals because they never break the crime cycle, they consider prison to be a part of the social security system and are not interested in rehabilitation. If you examine cases on an individual base then Aboriginals are actually dealt with more leniently for the same crimes, particularly in regards to sexual assault offences.


Where did you get that information from? Have you got a link?

Spot
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #132 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 5:30pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 2:13pm:
Try again:

For each year, adjusting for social background, past and present criminality and court processing factors reduced the initial baseline differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

That study does not address so called "indigenous courts" where sentencing is much more lenient, like I said you dont have the full story and need to be more questioning.
Quote:
Indigenous participation in sentencing procedures has been occurring informally in remote communities for some time. During the late 1990s, formalisation of this practice began in urban areas with the advent of Indigenous sentencing and Circle Courts. Formalisation has also occurred in remote areas. The aim has been to make court processes more culturally appropriate, to engender greater trust between Indigenous communities and judicial officers, and to permit a more informal and open exchange of information about defendants and their cases. Indigenous people, organisations, elders, family and kin group members are encouraged to participate in the sentencing process and to provide officials with insight into the offence, the character of victim-offender relations, and an offender's readiness to change.
Involvement by members of the Indigenous community in sentencing urban Indigenous offenders began in South Australia in 1999, after several years' consultation with community groups. Since then, new justice practices have been established in other jurisdictions. These are:

courts in urban centres, which set aside one to three days a month to sentence Indigenous offenders; and
practices in remote Indigenous communities when judicial officers travel on circuit.
Examples of the first kind include the Nunga and Aboriginal Courts in South Australia, the Koori Courts in Victoria, the Murri and Rockhampton Courts in Queensland, and Circle Sentencing in New South Wales. The second comprises sentencing circles in more remote parts of Western Australia and New South Wales, and Justice Groups in Queensland. There is some overlap between the two; however, the differences reflect the varied contexts of Indigenous justice practices (urban, country, remote) and the different modes of Indigenous participation in the sentencing process.

https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi277
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #133 - Jan 14th, 2019 at 5:40pm
 
When one looks at it

Black is bad

Therefore the darker the person

The badder they getz

We could solve so many problems simply by keeping the darkies away from us civilized whites.
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8344
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Black = bad
Reply #134 - Jan 15th, 2019 at 10:15am
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 5:06pm:
rhino wrote on Jan 14th, 2019 at 12:52pm:
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 10:59am:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jan 13th, 2019 at 6:00am:
Just because there are a lot of indigenous ppl in jail doesn't mean they committed crimes. It means they are targeted by the police. Remember when Joe bjelke put all of them he could find in the black hole for the Commonwealth games? Who would think that doesn't still happen? The crimes they have committed are likely vagrancy related.

Spot


Spot on Spot, pardon the pun.

Courts discriminate shockingly against Aboriginal people.

Offences that would gain a warning or a good behaviour bond for a non-Aboriginal often result in jail time for Aboriginals.

"Whites" get off with a warning far more often than "blacks".

That's a fact.



I'll just post the summary, the whole study is very interesting.

Summary

This paper reports the findings from statistical analyses comparing the probability of receiving a prison sentence by Indigenous status in the lower courts of South Australia and New South Wales over an 11 year period (1998 to 2008). The primary aim was to identify whether there was a relationship between Indigenous status and imprisonment after controlling for other factors known to impact sentencing decisions. It was found that:

For each year, adjusting for social background, past and present criminality and court processing factors reduced the initial baseline differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous defendants in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

Overall, Indigenous defendants were more likely to receive a prison sentence, compared with non-Indigenous defendants in comparable circumstances in both jurisdictions (New South Wales and South Australia).

The pattern of disparity over time varied between the two jurisdictions of New South Wales and South Australia. In South Australia, in the period pre-2001, there was evidence of parity and even leniency. However, in more recent years, Indigenous offenders were more likely to receive a prison sentence. By contrast, Indigenous offenders had higher odds of imprisonment throughout the entire period in New South Wales.


So there is some support for the differential involvement hypothesis across the entire time period, but some negative disparity remains. More importantly, the analysis suggests that the gap in the decision to imprison in the lower courts between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders may well be increasing in both jurisdictions.

https://i.imgur.com/tkRW8ex.jpg

Figure 1 Independent effect of Indigenous status on the likelihood of an imprisonment order in adult lower courts (South Australia and New South Wales) by year

Note: Odds ratios reported. The adjusted odds ratios are estimated from a logistic regression model that controls for sex, age at disposition, prior history, offence seriousness, presence of multiple conviction counts, guilty plea and not released on bail.
The dashed red line represents equal odds, or parity. Odds ratios below this line indicate increasing leniency in favour of Indigenous offenders; odds ratios above this line indicate increasing harshness toward Indigenous offenders

www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/441-460/tandi447.html


I see you drank the Koolaid but unfortunately those statistics arent telling the real story, repeat offenders are being dealt with more harshly by the courts. Unfortunately most happen to be Aboriginals because they never break the crime cycle, they consider prison to be a part of the social security system and are not interested in rehabilitation. If you examine cases on an individual base then Aboriginals are actually dealt with more leniently for the same crimes, particularly in regards to sexual assault offences.


Where did you get that information from? Have you got a link?

Spot


Yes Spot ...

https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi447
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print