Australian Politics Forum - Charlie Hebdo Day.

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 40524
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #105 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:51pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:25am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Christianity is a sickness, what sort of arseholes would get

so upset by an artwork so as to murder the artist?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_%28...

Christians are a ticking time bombs and they are breeding here at our expense! Roll Eyes

Who was murdered for Piss Christ, dickheaddle?

No one claimed they were, Soren. Roll Eyes

You did, snivelling spineless apologist loon.

Did I? Where? Roll Eyes

It's highlighted, in red, you sanctimonious, snivelling creep.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 40524
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #106 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:54pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:45am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 10:59am:

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:56pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:38pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:24pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:13pm:

issuevoter wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 8:48pm:

Where's the doctor of divinity when you need him? Charlie Hebdo Day has little to do with what is being discussed here.

Charlie Hebdo Day is the day when European liberal democracy and freedom of speech (including the right to lampoon anyone and anything) was denied by Islam in the most violent terms.

Like 911 in New York, Muzlims said you will not have these freedoms.

If you attempt to exercise your rights, or your sense of humour, we will kill you in your homelands.

This is the meaning of Charlie Hebdo Day.

It was denied by some Muslims - extremists - not moderates. I agree with you that was reprehensible and uncalled for. Do not however, blame all Muslims nor the religion of Islam for this act.

Tell me, do you blame all of Germany for the Holocaust or all of Japan for the Rape of Nanking? I'm curious to see if your logic extends to people other than Muslims... Roll Eyes

Do you blame Nazis for the holocaust?

In WWII, yes, I do, Freediver. How many Nazis are alive today in Germany, out of a matter of interest? How many militarists in Japan are there alive today? You appear to like the idea of blaming all Muslims for the acts of a minority. Do you blame Germans for the Holocaust or Japanese for Nanking, Freediver? Roll Eyes

What's the difference between blaming Muslims and blaming Nazis?

Because only a tiny minority of Muslims commit Terrorism, FD. You've been arguing this now for over 15 years IIRC. Are you really so slow that you cannot learn even the basic facts of reality?

Quote:

Is it that the Muslims won and the Nazis lost, so we have to be snivelling sycophants for Islam?

No, because the majority of Muslims are just as much victims - even more so than Westerners - of the Terrorists. You really are a silly sausage if you believe being killed by Terrorists constitutes "victory" for Muslims. Roll Eyes

Were the vast majority of nazi victims fellow nazis? I'm curious.

You are now switching to the commies, gandalf.

As totalitarian and bloody as the Muslims but not quite the nazis.

So let's refine - Muslim ideology is like the commie/nazi ideology.

Or nazi/commie, if you prefer.

Totalitarian, intolerant, bloodthirsty, uncompromising arseholes is the common tread.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #107 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:04pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:25am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Christianity is a sickness, what sort of arseholes would get

so upset by an artwork so as to murder the artist?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_%28...

Christians are a ticking time bombs and they are breeding here at our expense! Roll Eyes

Who was murdered for Piss Christ, dickheaddle?

No one claimed they were, Soren. Roll Eyes

You did, snivelling spineless apologist loon.

Did I? Where? Roll Eyes

It's highlighted, in red, you sanctimonious, snivelling creep.

Ah. Where does it say I said anybody had been killed, Soren? Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #108 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:10pm

issuevoter wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 5:33pm:

Take for instance, the Shabab massacre in Nairobi yesterday. Where is the voice of revulsion from so-called moderate and law-abiding Muzlims and the Islamic world? If the majority of Muzlims are anti-terrrorist, as you apologists insist, they don't seem to mind them (terrorists) calling themselves Muzlim.

Oh, I don't doubt it is there. It just hasn't been reported yet. Like all reactions, it both takes time to penetrate the consciousness of Muslims and the media that they are reaction. Not that it would make any difference, you're so lost to Islamophobia, nothing that Muslims say or do would satisfy your hatred and bigotry, except perhaps to commit suicide. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #109 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:11pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:32pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 1:05pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 12:59pm:

I don't believe its possible to be a Nazi without believing in white racial superiority, as well as the need to implement ethnic cleansing and/or mass killings to protect said racial superiority.

Islam is simply submission to our creator, and arranging your personal lifestyle to accommodate that submission. All 5 of the main pillars, which virtually all muslims believe are the most important aspects of submission - including belief in the oneness of God, performing fasting, performing the pilgrimage, performing the 5 prayers and giving to charity - are entirely personal and spiritual in nature.

The idea that both belief systems are equally as dangerous as each other, and that the adherents each system produce are necessarily as fanatical and extreme as each other - is simply high farce.

I agree, for the majority of Muslims, they aren't interested in dominating anybody or anything. They just want to be left alone to get on with their lives. The Islamists however, do want to dominate everybody, including their fellow Muslims. FD refuses to acknowledge, just as do all the other Islamophobes, that the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peaceful, law-abiding individuals who don't like the Terrorists, who don't like being dictated to by the Terrorists and just want to get on with their lives. They never take into account that the most people who the Terrorists have wounded or killed are their fellow Muslims. I wonder why? Perhaps because it would destroy their narrow-minded views of the world? The "Us," versus, "them"? Roll Eyes

EVERY single Muslim majority country is a sh!thole because the majority of the people in them conduct their lives and arrange their societies along Islamic beliefs. Believing in Islam is a recipe for a sh!thole society. You don't have to be a terrorist, you just have to be a son of Mohammed. There are other sh!tholes for other reasons. Muslim countries are sh!tholes because of Islam. You can't forever excuse an obviously tyrannical, backward, idiotic ideology like Islam from any influence in the countries that subscribe to it, seeing that all of them have two things in common: Islam and being sh!tholes.

Being law-abiding in kuffar countries for Muslims means biding their time until they have the numbers to agitate for sharia. There is not a single liberal, open, reasonable Muslim majority country (yes, cuddly Malaysia is a sh!thole, too). By their fruits you can tell them and all their fruits - all their countries - are sh!tholes.

Peaceful, law-abiding Muslims everywhere have been able to create only sh!hole countries PRECISELY because of their adherence to Islam.
Islam bring no improvement to any Western country, only degradation, stupidity, superstition and a drag on everything Islam touches. Just as it does in Muslim countries.

Keep Islam out if you don't want a sh!thole country. (everyone but stupid Western countries know that).

See what I mean, G? Soren is so lost in his diseased mind he hates Muslims and Islam so much that he refuses to recognise reality.

Tsk, tsk, Soren, time for you to go back to the little kiddie's playground. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

issuevoter

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #110 - Jan 17^th, 2019 at 10:31pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:10pm:

issuevoter wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 5:33pm:

Take for instance, the Shabab massacre in Nairobi yesterday. Where is the voice of revulsion from so-called moderate and law-abiding Muzlims and the Islamic world? If the majority of Muzlims are anti-terrrorist, as you apologists insist, they don't seem to mind them (terrorists) calling themselves Muzlim.

Oh, I don't doubt it is there. It just hasn't been reported yet. Like all reactions, it both takes time to penetrate the consciousness of Muslims and the media that they are reaction. Not that it would make any difference, you're so lost to Islamophobia, nothing that Muslims say or do would satisfy your hatred and bigotry, except perhaps to commit suicide. Roll Eyes

Your reply is so becoming of a Doctor of Divinity. But while you are dealing out your judgement, the Islamic world is not reacting to the use of its name in the perpetration of horrific atrocities.

You are very quick to compare Christianity to Islam, yet no one is a high clerical position in Islam has called for an end to terrorism in the name of their religion. No one in Shia or Sunni Islam has shamed these bloodthirsty fanatics before Allah.

This business has been going on for over 2 decades, and when people point out that it is an Islamic problem, you say "No its not, you are just being Islamophobic".

The atrocity in Nairobi, the latest there, is not a Kenyan or a Christian problem. It is a problem within Islam, it's a Muzlim problem, and only they can fix it. Your Western relativist attitude only encourages more of the same.

Back to top

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #111 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 8:09am

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:54pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:45am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 10:59am:

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:56pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:38pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:24pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:13pm:

issuevoter wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 8:48pm:

Where's the doctor of divinity when you need him? Charlie Hebdo Day has little to do with what is being discussed here.

Charlie Hebdo Day is the day when European liberal democracy and freedom of speech (including the right to lampoon anyone and anything) was denied by Islam in the most violent terms.

Like 911 in New York, Muzlims said you will not have these freedoms.

If you attempt to exercise your rights, or your sense of humour, we will kill you in your homelands.

This is the meaning of Charlie Hebdo Day.

It was denied by some Muslims - extremists - not moderates. I agree with you that was reprehensible and uncalled for. Do not however, blame all Muslims nor the religion of Islam for this act.

Tell me, do you blame all of Germany for the Holocaust or all of Japan for the Rape of Nanking? I'm curious to see if your logic extends to people other than Muslims... Roll Eyes

Do you blame Nazis for the holocaust?

In WWII, yes, I do, Freediver. How many Nazis are alive today in Germany, out of a matter of interest? How many militarists in Japan are there alive today? You appear to like the idea of blaming all Muslims for the acts of a minority. Do you blame Germans for the Holocaust or Japanese for Nanking, Freediver? Roll Eyes

What's the difference between blaming Muslims and blaming Nazis?

Because only a tiny minority of Muslims commit Terrorism, FD. You've been arguing this now for over 15 years IIRC. Are you really so slow that you cannot learn even the basic facts of reality?

Quote:

Is it that the Muslims won and the Nazis lost, so we have to be snivelling sycophants for Islam?

No, because the majority of Muslims are just as much victims - even more so than Westerners - of the Terrorists. You really are a silly sausage if you believe being killed by Terrorists constitutes "victory" for Muslims. Roll Eyes

Were the vast majority of nazi victims fellow nazis? I'm curious.

You are now switching to the commies, gandalf.

As totalitarian and bloody as the Muslims but not quite the nazis.

So let's refine - Muslim ideology is like the commie/nazi ideology.

Or nazi/commie, if you prefer.

Totalitarian, intolerant, bloodthirsty, uncompromising arseholes is the common tread.

There is actually an important distinction to recognise here Frank.

Nazis don't run around screaming "death to these other nazis" as their most pressing priority. Jihadis do. If you can manage to acknowledge this fact, then that goes a long way to acknowledging just how diametrically opposed the jihadis ideology is to mainstream muslims'. The same cannot be said within nazism - sure there may be some differences regarding the use of violence etc, but at the end of the day, they are united in a racial supremacist, chauvinistic and deeply prejudicial ideology. You will of course retort that all muslms must submit to something similar, but you would of course be wrong. Muslims' core ideology is encapsulated in the 5 pillars - acceptance of the oneness of God, fasting, pilgrimage, prayer and charity. There is nothing in there that is implicity racialist/supremacist or chauvinistic in any way. Nothing implicity coercive, save for a personal spiritual commitment. All this malarky about submission to human authority, compulsory violence and attacking personal freedoms aren't even footnotes to the core belief system of Islam. They are inventions and/or distortions promoted by jihadis and Islamophobes alike.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #112 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 9:04am

issuevoter wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 10:31pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:10pm:

issuevoter wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 5:33pm:

Take for instance, the Shabab massacre in Nairobi yesterday. Where is the voice of revulsion from so-called moderate and law-abiding Muzlims and the Islamic world? If the majority of Muzlims are anti-terrrorist, as you apologists insist, they don't seem to mind them (terrorists) calling themselves Muzlim.

Oh, I don't doubt it is there. It just hasn't been reported yet. Like all reactions, it both takes time to penetrate the consciousness of Muslims and the media that they are reaction. Not that it would make any difference, you're so lost to Islamophobia, nothing that Muslims say or do would satisfy your hatred and bigotry, except perhaps to commit suicide. Roll Eyes

Your reply is so becoming of a Doctor of Divinity. But while you are dealing out your judgement, the Islamic world is not reacting to the use of its name in the perpetration of horrific atrocities.

Isn't it? My, all that fighting in Iraq and Syria and Nigeria and Chad appears to indicate otherwise, Issue. Appears you have been tripped up by reality, yet again. Then we have the problem - the MSM only reports bad news about Muslims it seems. Where was it's reports about the post-September 11 reaction? Didn't appear amongst all the breast beating. Funny that. Same after each other major Terrorist attack. Disgusting actually.

Quote:

You are very quick to compare Christianity to Islam, yet no one is a high clerical position in Islam has called for an end to terrorism in the name of their religion. No one in Shia or Sunni Islam has shamed these bloodthirsty fanatics before Allah.

There are literally not meant to be "any high clerical positions in Islam". What exists has been created since the days of Mohammed and what exists isn't terribly representative of the majority of Muslims. Basically Islamic Clerics speak for themselves. As a consequence you have many charlatans and fakirs. Which Islamophobes like you lap up.

Quote:

This business has been going on for over 2 decades, and when people point out that it is an Islamic problem, you say "No its not, you are just being Islamophobic".

Oh, dear, it appears you, like most Islamophobes have completely misunderstood what I have been saying all this time. Not unsurprising, considering the level of bigotry you display. I only point out Islamophobia when you have failed to listen to what Muslims and their sympathisers have been saying. When you display outright hatred of Islam and all Muslims. If you couched your criticisms politely and with some degree of knowledge, you wouldn't have the charge of Islamophobia made against you. Funny how I react to what you and other Islamophobes say. Remarkable even. Roll Eyes

Quote:

The atrocity in Nairobi, the latest there, is not a Kenyan or a Christian problem. It is a problem within Islam, it's a Muzlim problem, and only they can fix it. Your Western relativist attitude only encourages more of the same.

I'd actually say it's a Somali problem, not a general Muslim problem. The Somalis are crazy and have been for decades. They kill all non-Somalis, Muslim, Christian, alike. They are out to create a Terrorist situation and don't care who they kill. How that is going to further their aim of spreading Islam, I have no idea. You, in your Islamophobic ranting have decided that all Muslims are responsible for the actions of a tiny minority of crazies. It's like suggesting all Irish are responsible for the actions of the PIRA or all Italians are responsible for the Mafia. However, I suspect that will fall on deaf ears as per usual. Tsk, tsk, don't worry, it's time to trot along back to the little kiddies' playground where your antics are tolerated. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47367
At my desk.

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #113 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 12:21pm

Quote:

Nazis don't run around screaming "death to these other nazis" as their most pressing priority. Jihadis do.

Some do. Notably ISIS, when they are not trying to inspire lone wolf attacks in the west. Some don't, like with 9/11.

Also, the reason Nazis are not killing each other today is that they lost. If they had won, their empire may already have been fracturing today, just like the Muslim one did as soon as Muhammad died, and Nazis would be fighting fellow Nazis over the remains.

Quote:

If you can manage to acknowledge this fact, then that goes a long way to acknowledging just how diametrically opposed the jihadis ideology is to mainstream muslims'. The same cannot be said within nazism - sure there may be some differences regarding the use of violence etc, but at the end of the day, they are united in a racial supremacist, chauvinistic and deeply prejudicial ideology.

Are they a mindless collective?

Quote:

Muslims' core ideology is encapsulated in the 5 pillars - acceptance of the oneness of God, fasting, pilgrimage, prayer and charity. There is nothing in there that is implicity racialist/supremacist or chauvinistic in any way. Nothing implicity coercive, save for a personal spiritual commitment. All this malarky about submission to human authority, compulsory violence and attacking personal freedoms aren't even footnotes to the core belief system of Islam. They are inventions and/or distortions promoted by jihadis and Islamophobes alike.

Is the Quran "not even a footnote" in Islam's belief system? Is it an invention or a distortion? Would it be fair to describe your post as a Muslim trying to mislead non-Muslims about the promotion of violence and Islamofascism in Islamic texts?

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #114 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 1:32pm

freediver wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 12:21pm:

Is the Quran "not even a footnote" in Islam's belief system? Is it an invention or a distortion? Would it be fair to describe your post as a Muslim trying to mislead non-Muslims about the promotion of violence and Islamofascism in Islamic texts?

I know you've never read it, but in the off chance that you do, maybe you can get back to me on what proportion of the Quran is dedicated to promoting violence against others, and what proportion is about personal, spiritual matters between the individual and God.

freediver wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 12:21pm:

Also, the reason Nazis are not killing each other today is that they lost. If they had won, their empire may already have been fracturing today, just like the Muslim one did as soon as Muhammad died, and Nazis would be fighting fellow Nazis over the remains.

Still doesn't explain why, despite you conceding a clear difference here, you treat both groups as the same

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #115 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 2:22pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:25am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Christianity is a sickness, what sort of arseholes would get

so upset by an artwork so as to murder the artist?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_%28...

Christians are a ticking time bombs and they are breeding here at our expense! Roll Eyes

Who was murdered for Piss Christ, dickheaddle?

No one claimed they were, Soren. Roll Eyes

You did, snivelling spineless apologist loon.

Did I? Where? Roll Eyes

It's highlighted, in red, you sanctimonious, snivelling creep.

Ah. Where does it say I said anybody had been killed, Soren? Roll Eyes

Even by the usual and now normalised standards of forum luvvies for disingenuous dissembling evasion if not outright lies, that's a pathetic response Brian.

Back to top

IP Logged

moses

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6353

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #116 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 2:55pm

Quote:

They are out to create a Terrorist situation and don't care who they kill. How that is going to further their aim of spreading Islam, I have no idea.

gee I dunno either, I wonder why muzzies love killing.

I mean they have a *holy book* which is riddled with bloodlust verses, here's just a tiny selection:

qur'an 8.67: It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made a great slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.

qur'an 2.216: Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

qur'an 2.244: Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things

qur'an 3.151: We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve because they ascribe unto Allah partners, for which no warrant hath been revealed. Their habitation is the Fire, and hapless the abode of the wrong-doers.

qur'an 3.157: And if you are killed in the cause of Allah or die - then forgiveness from Allah and mercy are better than whatever they accumulate [in this world].

qur'an 3.158: And whether you die or are killed, unto Allah you will be gathered.

qur'an 4.74: Let those that fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the cause of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.

qur'an 4.95: Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward.

qur'an 9.111: Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is a promise which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. Who fulfilleth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice then in your bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.

Now what was the question again?

Oh that's right: How is slaughtering innocent people going to help spread islam?

------wwweelll it might have something to do with islam itself maybe, could be, you think so?????

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #117 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 3:18pm

Secret Wars wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 2:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:25am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Christianity is a sickness, what sort of arseholes would get

so upset by an artwork so as to murder the artist?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_%28...

Christians are a ticking time bombs and they are breeding here at our expense! Roll Eyes

Who was murdered for Piss Christ, dickheaddle?

No one claimed they were, Soren. Roll Eyes

You did, snivelling spineless apologist loon.

Did I? Where? Roll Eyes

It's highlighted, in red, you sanctimonious, snivelling creep.

Ah. Where does it say I said anybody had been killed, Soren? Roll Eyes

Even by the usual and now normalised standards of forum luvvies for disingenuous dissembling evasion if not outright lies, that's a pathetic response Brian.

Oh, I suppose I could just accept Soren's imposition of an outright falsehood instead of questioning it as being at odds to reality however, I am a realist, unlike him and apparently you. I suppose being an Islamophobe allows you to be a bigot. Tsk, tsk, run along, back to your little kiddies' playground. I can hear your name being called by your minder. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 39533

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #118 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 3:19pm

moses wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 2:55pm:

Quote:

They are out to create a Terrorist situation and don't care who they kill. How that is going to further their aim of spreading Islam, I have no idea.

gee I dunno either, I wonder why muzzies love killing.

I wonder how Christians love killing, Moses? Care to explain, Mmmm? Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Charlie Hebdo Day.
Reply #119 - Jan 18^th, 2019 at 3:24pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 3:18pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jan 18^th, 2019 at 2:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2019 at 7:25am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 4:57pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2019 at 3:01pm:

Christianity is a sickness, what sort of arseholes would get

so upset by an artwork so as to murder the artist?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Piss_Christ_by_Serrano_Andres_%28...

Christians are a ticking time bombs and they are breeding here at our expense! Roll Eyes

Who was murdered for Piss Christ, dickheaddle?

No one claimed they were, Soren. Roll Eyes

You did, snivelling spineless apologist loon.

Did I? Where? Roll Eyes

It's highlighted, in red, you sanctimonious, snivelling creep.

Ah. Where does it say I said anybody had been killed, Soren? Roll Eyes

Even by the usual and now normalised standards of forum luvvies for disingenuous dissembling evasion if not outright lies, that's a pathetic response Brian.

Oh, I suppose I could just accept Soren's imposition of an outright falsehood instead of questioning it as being at odds to reality however, I am a realist, unlike him and apparently you. I suppose being an Islamophobe allows you to be a bigot. Tsk, tsk, run along, back to your little kiddies' playground. I can hear your name
being called by your minder. Roll Eyes

Then you suppose wrong. I looked at what you stated then looked at your pathetic limbo dance when called in it. Full of crap, seems to be a common symptom among constipated virtue signallers.

Back to top

IP Logged