Cu Chulainn
|
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 8 th, 2019 at 8:16pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Jan 8 th, 2019 at 7:01pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 8 th, 2019 at 5:25pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Jan 8 th, 2019 at 4:23pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 8 th, 2019 at 1:22pm: cods wrote on Jan 7 th, 2019 at 11:08pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 7 th, 2019 at 10:18pm: Bobby. wrote on Jan 7 th, 2019 at 10:08pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 7 th, 2019 at 10:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Jan 7 th, 2019 at 8:46pm: I started a poll. Democracy - the sacred institution, shall rule. What is right, is not always popular, what is popular is not always right. Something some people here fail to understand. You are appealling to the basest instincts of people who are Racist, Bobby. It's got nothing to do with racism. It's about law and order. It's about telling the truth. I has everything to do with racism. There have been more New Zealanders arrested in Victoria for committing offences than Sudanese, yet it is only the Sudanese which get the stick from people like you. I wonder why, hey? Racists. funny I havent heard of any Kiwi gangs doing home invasion and stealing daily on beaches... can you put up the links to Do a websearch, Cods. The information is widely available, if you'll look. Of course you won't, now will you? Funny that, hey? Here's a titbit to wet your interest: Fact check: Do Sudanese people account for only 1 per cent of crimes committed in Victoria? Quote:Kiwi gangs in Victoria bri?
thank you? Kiwi individuals, Cods. It also depends on how you use the term 'gang". Do you mean an organised, usually hierarchical group of individuals or do you just mean a group of individuals who group together occasionally? The former implies organisation, the later not. What I find interesting is how being part of a "gang" has sinister implications associated with it when applied to Sudanese migrants but when applied to white kids, it doesn't. Funny that, hey? "The only thing you can say of the reported offences is: 1 per cent are committed by South Sudanese people and they comprise 0.1 per cent of the population.From your fact check... Now extrapolate on that. Oh, dear, selective quoting? Tsk, tsk, appears you missed the point: Quote:The statistics show that between April 2017 and March 2018, 71.3 per cent of unique offenders in Victoria (58,798) were born in Australia, while 2.2 per cent (1,803) were New Zealand-born.
This compares to 1.1 per cent of unique offenders (879) being Sudanese-born. So many more offenders came from New Zealand compared to Sudan... Not selective quoting at all, the only way to look at it is crime per head of a population to see how much crime one group does. 1% from just 0.1% of the population is rather large. All things being equal if they were 1% of the population they would commit 10%. How much if they were 10% of the population. The fact is they are way over represented in crime. Depends how you read it. It states a percentage of the total "offenders" not of the total "population". As we don't know what the total number of "offenders" was, you really cannot make such a claim. From your fact check... Quote:According to data compiled by the Victorian research body the Crime Statistics Agency (CSA), the vast majority of crimes in Victoria are committed by Australian and New Zealand-born people.
Between April 2017 and March 2018, they made up a combined 73.5 per cent of the unique offender population (those people alleged to have committed crimes) in Victoria; whereas, those born in Sudan made up 1.1 per cent. Now if Australians and Kiwis only made up 73% of the population of Victoria and did 73% of crimes 1% of them would be committing crimes. The Sudanese population of 0.1% doing 1% of crimes makes them 10x more likely to commit crimes and they seem to be far too often violent crimes.
|