Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print
The real threat of biblical law (Read 2991 times)
The Reboot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 624
None of your damn business
Gender: female
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #15 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 12:58pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 12:42pm:
The document condemns abortion and same-sex marriage and describes how those who don’t follow biblical law should be punished. At one point, the document says,

“If they do not yield, kill all males.”


Oh dear.


Not females? Wow, this guy is progressive!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 38431
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #16 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:40pm
 
Bobby,
Quote:
You'll find that Sharia law is plagiarised directly out of the Old Testament -
which Jesus himself said was still binding.

FD,
Quote:
How many Jews did Jesus slaughter? How many children did he rape?


Jesus said,

" let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "


Back to top
 

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Carl Sagan
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23856
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #17 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:44pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:40pm:
Bobby,
Quote:
You'll find that Sharia law is plagiarised directly out of the Old Testament -
which Jesus himself said was still binding.

FD,
Quote:
How many Jews did Jesus slaughter? How many children did he rape?


Jesus said,

" let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "




Yes, and on that count he was stuffed from the day he was born being spawned out of an adulterous relationship...and a paedo relationship...Mary (the betrothed child bride of Joseph) had with God.
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90106
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #18 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:45pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JollyGreenGiant
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 109
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #19 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 4:52pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:40pm:
Bobby,
Quote:
You'll find that Sharia law is plagiarised directly out of the Old Testament -
which Jesus himself said was still binding.

FD,
Quote:
How many Jews did Jesus slaughter? How many children did he rape?


Jesus said,

" let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "




Yes, and on that count he was stuffed from the day he was born being spawned out of an adulterous relationship...and a paedo relationship...Mary (the betrothed child bride of Joseph) had with God.


Did you ever pretend to be Santa?

Or are you going to give that a swipe as well?

How about letting people make up their own minds what they believe in, huh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 34283
At my desk.
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #20 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 4:57pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:40pm:
Bobby,
Quote:
You'll find that Sharia law is plagiarised directly out of the Old Testament -
which Jesus himself said was still binding.

FD,
Quote:
How many Jews did Jesus slaughter? How many children did he rape?


Jesus said,

" let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "




Yes, and on that count he was stuffed from the day he was born being spawned out of an adulterous relationship...and a paedo relationship...Mary (the betrothed child bride of Joseph) had with God.


In the ultimate feat of hypocrisy, Aussie holds this against Jesus while demanding proof of the historical record of Muhammad's rape and pillage.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23856
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #21 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 5:22pm
 
Quote:
In the ultimate feat of hypocrisy, Aussie holds this against Jesus while demanding proof of the historical record of Muhammad's rape and pillage.


Yes, a fair cop (one I anticipated was coming) in one sense. 

However, I am entitled to compare and contrast.  You get up Islam and Mo because of paedo schit, so I am firing back with Christian/God paedo schit.  Sure, some Book says Mo wiped out some Jews...another Book says God wiped out some Egyptians.

I don't believe either. Why do you Effendi?
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11238
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #22 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 6:53pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 5:22pm:
Quote:
In the ultimate feat of hypocrisy, Aussie holds this against Jesus while demanding proof of the historical record of Muhammad's rape and pillage.


Yes, a fair cop (one I anticipated was coming) in one sense. 

However, I am entitled to compare and contrast.  You get up Islam and Mo because of paedo schit, so I am firing back with Christian/God paedo schit.  Sure, some Book says Mo wiped out some Jews...another Book says God wiped out some Egyptians.

I don't believe either. Why do you Effendi?

So a 'natural' event or military victory attributed to god is the same , morally, a a warlord executing hundreds because of his self-made and so self-justifying doctrines? Not even you can say that with a straight face.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23856
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #23 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 7:07pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 6:53pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 5:22pm:
Quote:
In the ultimate feat of hypocrisy, Aussie holds this against Jesus while demanding proof of the historical record of Muhammad's rape and pillage.


Yes, a fair cop (one I anticipated was coming) in one sense. 

However, I am entitled to compare and contrast.  You get up Islam and Mo because of paedo schit, so I am firing back with Christian/God paedo schit.  Sure, some Book says Mo wiped out some Jews...another Book says God wiped out some Egyptians.

I don't believe either. Why do you Effendi?

So a 'natural' event or military victory attributed to god is the same , morally, a a warlord executing hundreds because of his self-made and so self-justifying doctrines? Not even you can say that with a straight face.



Come on Sore End.  What does it matter what the weapon was?  It is said that God used a plague to wipe out Egyptian first borns, no matter the age....(he was a fan of curses you know).....Mo was far more up front using numerical and physical might to slice up Jewish combatants.

Allegedly.
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
Cu Chullain
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2022
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #24 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:02pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 7:07pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 6:53pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 5:22pm:
Quote:
In the ultimate feat of hypocrisy, Aussie holds this against Jesus while demanding proof of the historical record of Muhammad's rape and pillage.


Yes, a fair cop (one I anticipated was coming) in one sense. 

However, I am entitled to compare and contrast.  You get up Islam and Mo because of paedo schit, so I am firing back with Christian/God paedo schit.  Sure, some Book says Mo wiped out some Jews...another Book says God wiped out some Egyptians.

I don't believe either. Why do you Effendi?

So a 'natural' event or military victory attributed to god is the same , morally, a a warlord executing hundreds because of his self-made and so self-justifying doctrines? Not even you can say that with a straight face.



Come on Sore End.  What does it matter what the weapon was?  It is said that God used a plague to wipe out Egyptian first borns, no matter the age....(he was a fan of curses you know).....Mo was far more up front using numerical and physical might to slice up Jewish combatants.

Allegedly.


So one lot giving credit to their sky fairy for killing multitudes is the same as the other lot actually killing for their sky fairy?

If you want to compare apples with apples, go look in Judges rather than Exodus.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23856
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #25 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:08pm
 
Nope. That is not my mission.  Mo hacked to death some Jews...allegedly....God killed off the first born Egyptian male..and that was just one of his alleged ten curses.....famine, pestulence etc.

So, what was your point?
Back to top
 

And Indian women aren't exactly LBFMs..yuk. 
 
IP Logged
 
Cu Chullain
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2022
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #26 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:21pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:08pm:
Nope. That is not my mission.  Mo hacked to death some Jews...allegedly....God killed off the first born Egyptian male..and that was just one of his alleged ten curses.....famine, pestulence etc.

So, what was your point?


Ascribing some natural phenomena to god or going out and doing something in the name of god are two different things.

If you want to compare apples to apples, look in Judges where the Jews go out and kill in the name of their god.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 34283
At my desk.
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #27 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:52pm
 
Jesus didn't slaughter anyone. Or rape any children.

Quote:
Yes, a fair cop (one I anticipated was coming) in one sense. 

However, I am entitled to compare and contrast.


Of course. Don't let a little glaring hypocrisy stand in the way of your defense of Islamic extremism. Just fall back on the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 38431
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #28 - Jan 3rd, 2019 at 8:56pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 3:45pm:


Will Greggy's blasphemy be allowed?

see below.

...


Back to top
 

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Carl Sagan
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18468
Gender: male
Re: The real threat of biblical law
Reply #29 - Jan 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm
 
Cu Chullain wrote on Jan 3rd, 2019 at 1:23am:
Bam wrote on Jan 2nd, 2019 at 11:53pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 2nd, 2019 at 7:32pm:
Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy.

If by Biblical law you mean some kind of "Christian" law, you are wrong. Christianity is on the other end of the spectrum to Islam. The very concept of biblical law is antithetical to Christian doctrine.

Which is of course why it is Muslims, not Christians, raping and pillaging their way across the middle east.

Why are there some Christians in the USA openly calling for people to be killed? Did you even read the articles? Denying the problem is not going to make it go away.

It doesn't matter if it's Muslims seeking to impose Sharia law or Christians seeking to impose Biblical law. In both cases, a small minority of fanatics want to kill people in the name of their faith. Both must be opposed with equal vigour.


There's a huge difference between the two, one of them has wealthy countries that fund them all over the world and are supported in their views by up to 20% of the other >1.2 billion or so adherents, the others are looked on with with disdain by most people of their faith, and will never get their way and do nothing more than talk. One is far more dangerous than the other.

The problem with your post: it's not possible to tell which group of dangerous fanatics is which.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print