If you want anyone to spend an hour+ of their lives on content someone as dishonest as you posts, you're going to need to offer a little more.

"Everything is in the video, watch it you gigantic dickhead" isn't enough.

You could start by articulating the main theme of the video, what you believe it to be claiming and the proof they've offered, I'm not asking for an essay but just a brief outline, that will help people decide if they want to risk the time on you.

Given this is a discussion forum, your take, your position on the video/content would also help.

Reposting someone else works and being like "Booom! Someone's going to burn!" isn't enough.

Right now, you just post these snippets from articles or these long videos and then call for some sort of corporal punishment or even killings and then attack those who reply.  What the?

While I don't have a lot of respect for Q, in fact, none given how they exploit the people that believe their crap, you're not clever enough to leave open-ended questions where the desperate can find whatever they want as an answer to validate what he been posted in their minds, as Q does.

You've just not go the chops for that.  That may have worked on you, but then you've been comically easy to red pill.  So much so you've even become a boomer.

If you want people to engage you're going to need to take an approach that... well, that more suits your intellect.

Wow!

There was no Clinton charity after the Clinton Library.

The Clinton Foundations were fronts for money laundering, fraud, extortion and treason.

The Clinton's make Al Capone and John Gotti look like boy scouts. The media if they mention this will probably blame Trump for the racket.