For the first time a real investigation will begin - just 17 years later!

All the evidence of explosives and pyrotechnic devices used to bring down the 3 buildings will be assessed by a jury. Expect a cascade of more evidence as others feel safer to come forward.

Those directly involved and those involved in the cover up in the deaths of 3,000 will be pissing themselves. Remember to knowingly cover up a crime is to be considered complicit.

But her emails!

Richdude wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 1:21am:


Why are you defending Al-Qaeda?

Marla wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 4:22am:


So the murder of 3,000 fellow countrymen is OK with you?

Of course you are a fascist/commo and the means justifies the ends. How do you know that you maybe next - is that OK to?

Richdude wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 11:37am:


But her emails!

This case will cause fear among those who were responsible and those who were negligent, including Zelikow, the chairman of the 9/11 committee, and Sivaraj Shyam-Sunder, the NIST stooge responsible for the bogus WTC 7 report.

At the very least the investigation will reveal all the issues willfully neglected by the 9/11 committee and Sivaraj Shyam-Sunder.

The investigation will expose huge amounts of valuable evidence that has been hidden by administrations.

Obama promised to expose concealed evidence of the 9/11 incident but did not do so.

Donald Trump promised to expose the culprits behind 9/11 but did not do so.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 1:10pm:


Let us hope the justice system is more powerful than the forces that have willfully concealed the facts and evidence of the 9/11 incidents.

Richdude wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 11:37am:


The murder of 3,000 mostly Americans was okay with the Bush administration. You could tell when Mr Bush was giving the disingenuous gaze during his notification about the attack.

Had the United States government wanted to stop this attack from happening, they would have prevented it with ease. The fact that they have had so many years to prevent a terrorist attack like the September 11 attacks, given that evidence after evidence has come forward that they counter terrorism people knew about the attack, just proves that the United States government was complicit in the attacks.

oh boy,,


this is GOLD..

Please allow us to Counter...

Richdude wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 11:37am:



When you pull the conspiracy poo from the likes of 4Chan? Do.bugger.Off.

Richdude wrote on Dec 15^th, 2018 at 11:03am:


Of course not, but that's also not proof of your claim.

9/11 commission report was corrupt and even commissioners dissociated themselves from the report.

The NIST report is not peer-reviewed because NIST obstructs peer review. It's corrupt.

Richdude wrote on Dec 15^th, 2018 at 12:50pm:


I don't know what happened during September 11th.

Global deep state conspiracy, or opportunistic smaller foe exploiting the weakness of a bigger one?

What I will say however is that what you've done is fail to understand a phenomenon you've seen and rather than then going and looking to understand it more, discover the facts or increase your levels of knowledge around engineering, construction, chemistry and physics, you've basically admitted to is,

"I don't understand what happened, therefore, the official explanation doesn't make sense to me.  It's not me or my lack of understanding that's the problem, it must instead be a deep state conspiracy and now that I see the truth, I'm special".

A lack of understanding making you question the official story or its supporting evidence does not immediately validate the opposing explanation.

You still need evidence to prove that it was an inside job, which you don't have.

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 15^th, 2018 at 1:20pm:



But I do and so have you.

Just look at the way those buildings came down. They turned to dust mid air at free fall speed. That means there was no energy lost in collision - yet the structure still dissolved. How can that be a "progressive or pancake collapse"? It can't because well placed explosives, pyro technology and whatever was used.

The residue from the towers were analysed and found to contain thermitic and explosive material. 

Of course the 9/11 Commission Report found no evidence of explosives. Why? They didn't test for explosives.

The evidence is all there only the dumbest of the dumb  accept the official account.

Heres a quote that perfectly explains you, Bojack, DNA, Rino et all mind set.

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over, you almost never get it back.”
— Carl Sagan

And you my Sad friend have been taken in and no longer hunger for the truth. Grow the F... up numbskull!

Richdude wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 1:57am:


Explosive paint! 

Another 2 dumb trolls - too stupid to come up with a counter argument.

Yep! Dumbest of the dumb - sad reflection on humanity.

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 15^th, 2018 at 1:20pm:


omg, what a load of horseshit..

time and time and time again evidence has been shown on this forum and you have IGNORED the lot 100%...

you don't even believe your own eyes...

with the thermite that they found at the twin tower sites, which was everywhere, it was estimated there must have been at lease 10 tons of it used to bring the towers down..

there were explosions in the basements before the plans even hit...

tower 7 just fell down into its own footprint...

the only way that this will happen is if its a controlled demolition....

and yet you expect us to just believe it just fell down out of fear?

a "phenomenon" 

what a smacking moron...

you need to do some of your OWN research so that you can understand what you see with your own eyes so that you don't come on here every day like a retarded deep state propaganda puppet... 

step one...

watch this..

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 7:22am:


OK Sad one!

  Why don't you do some research and tell us why 1/2 the 19 Arab terrorists were found and still alive after 9/11 - living in the ME?

EXPLAIN your conspiracy theory to us!

Richdude wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 1:07pm:


I'd first want to see proof of that claim.

I'm really not up to speed with the ins and outs of the truther movement.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 14^th, 2018 at 8:21am:


Al-Quada stood and proudly claimed responsibility for many atrocities, They always said that 9/11 wasn't them.

I do not buy the US did it to themselves conspiracies however it is fairly clear that something happened different to the whole story we have all been told. There are too many holes and obvious false hoods.

We know that a group of Arabs hijacked planes and two were flown into the towers.

We know the building collapsed in a rather odd manner.

We know a second building collapsed in a controlled manner for no apparent reason.

We know that The white house was damaged in a manner inconsistent with the reported event ans the wreckage was not consistent either.

There are many other unanswered questions and questions where the answers do not look to be genuine.

Questions like were the Talaban responsible ? I have no idea but they typically would have claimed responsibility and they didn't, the attack was 100% staffed by Egyptians this is also inconsistent with the Taliban ?

On the day there were various excersises that virtually put the Armed forces out of commission particularly the air force.

IMO there is just too many areas with inadequate explanation.

I don't believe for one second that the US government or agencies are responsible but I am fairly sure that some important information is missing from the public domain.

We knoe there are discrepancies among reports of what crashed into the white house.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 6:46pm:


Even a simple Wiki article lists several occasions where Bin Laden denied that his group had any involvement or knowledge. His group had a history of quickly claiming responsibility for other terrorist actions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11_attacks

Quote:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 7:40pm:


Ah, no.

He claimed responsibility for the attacks, several times.

Why are so many people making excuses for this bastard?

Marla wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 11:23pm:


Heather Penney and Marc H. Sasseville.

They were ordered to scramble and intercept in jets armed with dummy training payloads, but they decided on their own how they would ram the plane. Luckily for them it had already crashed when they arrived. The "asked for volunteers" bit is embellishment on a story that needed none.

Marla wrote on Dec 16^th, 2018 at 11:23pm:


Everything else about 9/11 is a lie, but that bit is true.

Richdude wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 12:42am:


Please anybody else dispute my post?

The government can't even keep a semen stained dress secret, how do you think it would go at trying to keep this secret.

Richdude wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 1:08pm:



The weird thing is Carl Sagan would accept the current version. Why? because of his other saying "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:


I'm also stuck with the desire to accept the simplest possible theoretical explanation for existing data.

It's not a complicated conspiracy of a faux terrorist attack trying to cover the Government secretly bringing down buildings with their own citizens without leaving any evidence behind, photographic or physical, and nobody has come forward who was part of the plot.

It's a lot to accept on faith alone given that there is no evidence to support it.

There are theories, there are holes in the accepted account of events yes, but this is not evidence supporting an opposition hypothesis.

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 1:20pm:




To me this also goes to it being a like a 1000 piece jigsaw with 20 pieces missing. Yes the pieces are missing, but you can still the jigsaws of a boat.

Term Dog wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 1:29pm:


They aren't directed towards me.

Are the flat Earth society in on this one!

What we do know for certain is the Bush administration used 9/11 to orchestrate a war with Iraq who had nothing to do with the attacks on America....People just keep trying to justify America's war for oil by overlooking the obvious....America is the evil empire which cannot be trusted and cannot be stopped!!!

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 18^th, 2018 at 8:38am:


  You mean that you not honest in all your posts? That figures. Your an idiot!

You obviously don't know much but not knowing makes you feel comfy. Rest easy..........

Now hand over that PhD.

Richdude wrote on Dec 18^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:




Weirdly vague insult. Which drugs by the way would I be addicted to?

Richdude wrote on Dec 18^th, 2018 at 11:26am:


Always makes me laugh.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 18^th, 2018 at 12:51pm:


I suppose he thinks 'F is for Family' is a kids cartoon too.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 17^th, 2018 at 1:28pm:


It isn't really that the pieces are missing it is more that someone changed the pieces in a way that makes the boat look more like a duck.

Every single section of the picture has been tampered with to some degree.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 18^th, 2018 at 7:10pm:



I respectfully disagree.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 19^th, 2018 at 8:49am:


The collapse of the twin towers , the third building the Pentagon damage all have significant flaws in the details released as well as so much of the peripheral reports from who did it the armed forces were having a day out and not available all the pentagon cameras were off and none of the reports align with known facts.

We are not talking about 20 pieces missing - there appears to have been tampering with the shape of every part of the story.

I don't know what happened but am fairly certain that it was different from what we have been told.

Golly! Now was this before or after the MOON NAZI chemtrails?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 19^th, 2018 at 7:08pm:



Can you please point out these flaws, instead of just saying there were flaws

Richdude wrote on Dec 20^th, 2018 at 10:04am:



just start with the fact that almost 1/2 of the alleged hijackers were still alive after 9/11.


Reference? You know one of those things you should be adding in your PhD?

Richdude wrote on Dec 20^th, 2018 at 12:38pm:



Then it should be easy to provide a reference, dude. You know the stuff that should be in a PhD. Show me a link to this.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 20^th, 2018 at 12:40pm:


Thats because you are high on drugs.

Tell me. How does a 110 story building collapse into its own footprint, less than one second after its ejected material?

It can't - the resistance of a massively strong building would prevent the collapse at the speed of gravity.

Richdude wrote on Dec 20^th, 2018 at 12:49pm:




But since we're asking, wherte does this 1 second come from?


Both buildings collapsed symmetrically and more or less straight down, though there was some tilting of the tops of the towers and a significant amount of fallout to the sides. In both cases, the section of the building that had been damaged by the airplanes failed, which allowed the floors above the impact zone to fall onto the undamaged structure below. As the collapse progressed, dust and debris could be seen shooting out of the windows several floors below the advancing destruction, caused by the sudden rush of air from the upper levels. The first fragments of the outer walls of the collapsed North Tower struck the ground 11 seconds after the collapse started, and parts of the South Tower after 9 seconds. The lower portions of both buildings' cores (60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) remained standing for up to 25 seconds after the start of the initial collapse before they too collapsed.[44]

Richdude wrote on Dec 20^th, 2018 at 1:02pm:




No it wasnt common knowledge, please produce eevidence

And as for free fall


https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/free-fall Using this calculator for the very top of both WTCs you can see that freefall time is under 10 seconds. So 11 seconds is in the realm of probability. PLease produce your evidence that it isn't.