Panther
Gold Member
Offline
My Heart beats True for the Red White & Blue...
Posts: 11106
Gender:
|
Aussie wrote on Dec 12 th, 2018 at 3:18pm: Panther wrote on Dec 12 th, 2018 at 1:00pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 12 th, 2018 at 12:30pm: 2 lots of punishment, having to bugger that gross fat manchild and now having to pay him for it.
Ewwwwwwwwwww Well I have nothing but praise for the American Legal System, not specifically for this particular outcome, but because if you bring a case to court & you win, the person who lost has to pay all court costs & legal fees....even your personal attorney fees.
In general if say you had XYZ Insurance Company that refused to pay for something you believed you were insured for. You think they should pay, but they flatly refuse.....so you hire a good lawyer to petition the court for satisfaction.
You win based on the merits of your complaint & overall case.
The court not only awards you satisfaction (the XYZ Insurance Company has to pay to fix your car).
Not only that, but simply because you won the case, & this is not at all unusual in the American Courts, you don't have to pay your lawyer a penny, nor any of his costs, nor any of the courts costs. All those costs will have to be paid by the XYZ Insurance Company.
The American System makes the wrong-doer conpletely liable for all court & legal costs, whereas the innocent....or wronged party....you.....shouldn't have the burden of any costs!
Wish they would adopt that sane protection of the innocent here in Australia, & stop punishing those that have been wronged, with court & legal fees.
I wonder how many legitimate grievances are never lodged here in Australia because people are just afraid, or just can't afford to put up $50,000 in legal costs to win a $20,000 case?
.. If that was correct, she'd be paying the $800,000.00 Donald lawyers sought. They got just over 25%. There seems to always be an exception to the rule.......President Trump being a multi-billionaire, & his lawyers millionaires, the court probably saw what he got from the bitch sent the message.....was sufficient due to his/their means.
His lawyer probably used a 'padding' rule too, & padded his fees to inflate them by over 50%......
I wonder also.....how much did her lawyer charge her, & what were his court costs which he would usually pass on to his client if the case is lost......
|