Captain Nemo wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2018 at 12:59pm:


Yes you're quite right, steady CO2 yet we have had all these cycles of warm and cold spells.

What does that tell you about CO2 and temperature...?

Captain Nemo wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2018 at 12:42pm:



No influence by natural processes at all?

"Warmer oceans release CO2 faster than thought"

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20413-warmer-oceans-release-co2-faster-th...

Wildfires didn't exist before current era?

Captain Nemo wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2018 at 12:42pm:



Of course I showed that the Antarctic is increasing according to one study. But that you want to ignore. Greenland Ice Mass is stable.


Captain Nemo wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2018 at 12:42pm:


Which ones exactly? Did you know about  the Cinque Ports?

"The coast of Kent, in southeast England, is the home of the 'Cinque Ports', a famous group of port towns. However, almost all of these historic ports are now well inland.

These ports have a well-documented history, including their gradual retreat from the sea. One of them, Romney, was a prosperous port in 791 AD [8]. As the sea retreated and it became no longer usable as a port, it was replaced by New Romney. In turn, New Romney gradually lost its sea access, and is now about 2 kilometres from the sea."

http://aoi.com.au/bcw/Sealevel/
So sea level dropped and it now is increasing. I guess it was the stable CO2 that caused it all.

Mediterranean towns now under water.

Captain Nemo wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2018 at 12:42pm:


People have moved before because of oceans rising, falling. You want sea level to be stable?

No it isn't FUN. It is however a reality.

Greenland ever wondered why it was named so....

Medieval warm period warmer than today.

Dahl_Jensen et al 1998
Wagner & Melles 2001
Kaplan et al 2002
Jiang et al 2002
Moore et al 2001
Grudd et al 2002
Seppa & Birks 2002
Dansgaard et al 1975
Korhola et al 2000
Naurzbaev et al 2002
Vaganov et el 1996
Briffa et al 1998
Scweingruber & Briffa 1996
Knudsen et al 2004
Grinsted et al 2006
Besonen et al 2008
Wagner et al 2008
Vare et al 2009
Norgaard-Pedersen & Mikkelsen 2009
Andresen et al 2004
Vinther et al 2010
Kobashi et al 2010
Kobashi et al 2008
Stuiver et al 1995
Dansgaard et al 1975
Jenings & Weiner 1996
Johnsen et al 2001
Vinther et al 2010
Larsen et al 2011
Hill et al 2001
Joynt & Wolfe 2001
Hantemirov & Shiyatov 2002
Andersson et al 2003
Helama et al 2005
Mazepa 2005
Weckstrom et al 2006
Jiang et al 2007
Zabenski & Gajewski 2007
Grudd 2008
Justwan et al 2008
Scire et al 2008
Axford et al 2009
Bjune et al 2009
Cook et al 2009
Fortin & Gajewski 2010
Buntgen et al 2011
Divine et al 2011
Ran et al 2011
Velle et al 2011
D’Andrea et al 2012
Esper et al 2012

You do realise that the blue line is lower than the previous lines above it don't you?

You don't?

Blimey! 

Not stable ... but losing mass at about 280 Gigatonnes per year. 

You need to look at the trend over a longer period which indicates that the Ice sheets are losing mass.

CO₂ going up, temperature going up, ice mass going down, sea level going up.

Not rocket science.

Well it seems everything is about money and yeah theres opportunities but it means changing everything and eventually getting rid of coal and oil. The conspiracy still doesnt make sense.

Spot