Quote:And my point wasn't even about denying genocide.
And yet, that is what you said. Is that why you kept insisting I never responded, because I was only responding to what you said, not to something else that you meant?
Quote:I guess that explains your bizarre incredulity that you were not addressing my point. lol
How is it bizarre to respond to what you said? Do you need me to do another quote bomb?
Quote:No I didn't, and we've been through this before. I stated clearly they meant what they said, but opined that in a different context they may think differently. Big difference.
You said they would change their mind if they actually came close to getting what they want. In other words, they did not mean what they said. If anyone else claimed Muslims would change their mind about Islam to what they think Islam really is. you would go into your hysterical mindless collective defence. But you do the same thing without blinking.
Quote:Thats why any muslim I might present that swears they don't support genocide would be no obstacle whatsoever to your argument - as you would simply subject them to the rhetorical question routine, starting with: "doesn't he consider Muhammad the best example"?
And yet you presented an example, and that is not how I responded.
Quote:If your assumptions that forms your attempted logic in the OP are correct, then you would of course be correct in your claim - muslims have to support genocide, whether they like it or not.
That is not my claim Gandalf. That is your strawman.
Quote:Therefore the only useful way of refuting your argument is to refute the logic that forms it.
Or you could give us an example of a Muslim who does not support genocide. But that is not an option for you, is it Gandalf?