freediver wrote on Dec 10
th, 2018 at 12:24pm:
No Gandalf. I am saying that all Muslims support genocide. Think of it like saying that all Nazis support genocide. This does not mean there are no polite Nazis with an aversion to getting their own hands dirty. It merely means that they all support genocide.
You are projecting onto my statement your view that only a "bloodthirsty monster" would support genocide, but as you yourself have argued, it is apparently possible to support genocide in a purely academic sense.
And you were right then to some extent. Here we are, talking about your excuses for slaughtering large numbers of innocent people, in a perfectly calm and rational manner, year after year. I presume you have not killed a single Jew in all that time. The ideology of Islam permits even people like you to jump on the bloodthirsty monster's bandwagon. I am still not sure how this works, but there is no rush.
You are the polite Nazi, the whore with a heart of gold, the noble savage. You are interesting.
So really, you're only point is that all musllms, while not all necessarily bloodthirsty monsters, all of them, to a man, woman and child, want large numbers of innocent people to be slaughtered - just as long as their hands don't get dirty?
Personally, I think people don't support genocide unless they firstly dehumanize people with outrageous and offensive blanket slurs like "all muslims support genocide". But don't worry FD, you've definitely got the high moral ground on this one.
Some are more than happy to get their hands dirty. Including about 100 Aussie Muslims currently raping and pillaging their way across the middle east. Though I imagine a lot of them are dead by now.
If you have forgotten what my point is again, check the thread title. You have now spent about four pages forgetting my one and only point.