Quote:You don't have to hand it back if you don't take it from them in the first place FD. Its difficult to imagine what could have been more catastrophic for western security, not to mention for the stability of Afghanistan - than what the US did in Afghanistan from 2001.
Earth to Gandalf: it was a failed state, with no recognised governing authority and with factions within it openly declaring war against the most powerful nation on earth, and doing their best to get it started. It could not have been less stable. Other than being very Muslim and very backwards, what could possibly attract you to the idea of just waiting to see what they did next?
Quote:As for Iraq, any viable transition plan would have included occupation by a large number of US troops as its most central pillar.
You attempted to argue that Iraq was somehow evidence that the US did not have a transition plan in Afghanistant. I asked you to explain that logic. Would you like to have another go?
Quote:As it turns out, the US almost from the very beginning was planning for an occupation not of Afghanistan, but Iraq.
So you think they got lost and turned up in Afghanistan by mistake?
Quote:So thats my logic - there was no transition plan, basically because they the US didn't want to allocate the resources that would have been essential for any viable transition plan.
So despite the obvious transition plan, which they are still following through with, your only argument is that they had no plan because you didn't think they wanted to commit the resources to one?