m18611136959 wrote on Nov 15
th, 2018 at 5:46pm:
There used to be a group of great people in Christianity who always put forward some unique theological views. Whether these great men fight for freedom for Christians can be compatible with truth and piety. Like Jews, they accepted all the wonders and wonders recorded in Hebrew scriptures, from Adam's garden to the vision of Daniel the prophet. And they, like orthodox Christians, oppose Jews because they are betraying the law of God. When it comes to the extremely noble mystery of the Trinity, reformers follow strict orthodox doctrines and can adopt the theological views of the earliest four or six religious conferences without restraint. Their statement is no different from the Athanasian doctrine that those who do not accept Orthodox beliefs will be permanently destroyed. The Eucharist variant, in which bread and wine become the flesh and blood of Christ in invisible conditions, may refute the power of argument and wit.
They did not consider the evidence provided by the senses of sight, touch and taste at all. The earliest Protestants were confused about their hesitations and concerns, and they were awed by what Jesus said in the provisions of the sacrament. Luther's idea was that Jesus'body appeared in the Eucharist. Calvin's idea was that "substance" existed. Zwingli believed that it was merely a spiritual communion and a simple Memorial ceremony. This idea gradually gained an advantage in Protestant churches. However, the sacrament of the lost mystery is richly compensated, such as the amazing doctrines of sin, redemption, faith, grace and fate, which can be obtained and abused from Sao Paulo's letters. Priests and teachers are sure to have answers to these delicate questions, but the ultimate improvement and widespread use is due to the first religious reformers, who regard these doctrines as the most basic element of the salvation of the soul.
So far, the power of supernatural faith has a negative tendency towards Protestants. Many calm-minded Christians would rather agree that the pancake is God than that God is a cruel and fickle tyrant. Nevertheless, Luther and his adversaries have made substantial and important contributions, and philosophers should have a duty to be fair to fearless fanatics. The superstitious structure, from the abuse of forgiveness to the Madonna's madness, was razed to the ground in their hands. Tens of thousands of men and women who made vows under the Abbey restored free and industrious social life. The holy rank system of saints, angels and imperfect secondary gods is deprived of earthly power and can only enjoy the happiness of the heavenly kingdom.
All this is deemed 'wrong' thanks to the 'Game Changers' known as the New Worlds.
Even Germany has chucked in the 'Christianity Gig' and thrown it back at the Jews and sent them packing back to Israel.
Christianity was like a "Going the wrong way, dead end" sort of thing for Europe for so long.
It will be France's turn soon to chuck in Christianity against the Moslems.
You could say that Europe no longer wants to 'Eat from the Tree of Knowledge' known as the Middle-East and its 'Religion'.
Now it wants to 'Eat from the Tree of Life' experienced by the New Worlds and "Live Forever"
Fiddle-farting on 'old' things like Socrates, Nietzche and others is just stroking one's own 'intellectual' ego - which is a 'dead end' of what is already 'known'.
Instead - you should be out here with me and seeking that which is 'to know'