Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12
th, 2018 at 7:21pm:
And every time teenagers at a concert are blown up for example, Muslim clerics and community leaders come out to condemn such actions. Every time. More, they show that such actions go against Islamic teachings. They work at spreading this message to young people, kids who they say are brainwashed by false Muslim teachings, largely through the Internet.
Every Australian Muslim leader has stated this. They all work closely with police, according to the police themselves. No community leader or parent wants their son or daughter caught up in terrorism, and before Yadda posts the pictures of that dad getting his kids to hold up severed heads, he had been diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Sane Muslims never stand side by side with Islsmic terrorists. Every Muslim I've met feels obliged to explain this to you if you discuss Islam. How often are whites asked to distance themselves from ethno-nationalist and white supremacist terrorism?
Almost never, but this thread has done so. You refused to condemn the actions of these terrorists and have continued to evade and change the subject. So has the Grappler, FD and the old boy.
You are all now officially on the spineless apologist list. You are shifty, evasive, handwringing cowards without any backbone whatsoever. You stand firmly with the terrorists. You support the murder of innocents.
I mean this in the nicest possible way.
You can't tell them apart until AFTER the bombs go off, 'sane' and 'terrorist'. Yes, the imams are mouthing off about condemnation AFTER every atrocity but they are utterly ineffective and USELESS BEFORE them.
The jihadis have impeccable Islamic, Koranic, Mohammedan credential. They are consistent and open and transparent.
The hand-wringers are not. Too much taqiya means their credibility is gone. So tell 'em buggerem. They are useless old fogies in fancy dress.
I think I can safely say I wouldn't have been able to tell you apart from Anders Brievik before he committed his attack. I'd probably still struggle to distinguish the two of you after - on general matters of ideology that is. Although I'd wager that not even Brievik would stand there with a straight face and claim that banning a piece of head dress is not any sort of deprivation of anyone's freedom.