There are two Korans...the Jihad Medina and the poetic Mecca versions, simply in context old and new testaments,   the majority of Muslims follow t that is he peaceful Mecca Koran or they do not follow violent Jihad extremism only a small percentage. Although are creating a big poo fight with terrorism. Just as the IRA did in Ireland.

Yet like any demographic people can be manipulated relatively easy like sheep, tell them something and they will follow,.... climate change another example....tell the sheep  its a hoax and they follow along bleating.

Charismatic Islamic extremist will sermon to the sheep and attract followers, unfortunately due to US war machinations with British and European colonisation has given the extremist element an edge to preach hate and convince people into acts of terror.

While terrorism is a security issue and violent it has nothing in violence compared to climate change events.

Does Pedro Curevo think the jihad Medina bits should be honestly questioned with a view to purging the evil bits, in order to stop this never ending muslim on muslim and muslim on non muslim violence?

Thanks, I think that eventually that is going to be the way to defeat islamic terrorism

It's ideological terrorism, so we have to fight ideology with ideology. IMHO

I'd like to see people start asking for muslims to be responsible for islamic terrorism and take steps to eradicate the evil in the qur'an which motivates the atrocities.

moses wrote on Oct 14^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:



That is what is required moses, accountability      [make the individual moslem responsible, in his choosing to be, and remain, a follower of ISLAM].

I'm not holding my breath though.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 25^th, 2018 at 1:16am:



But notice - he is not covering up all that hair.... he is hoping for some jinn-on-beard action (back, Karnal, BACK!!)

Militant Islam is a big security issue and a continuing problem.

Thankfully the security measures are fairly good at picking up the militant chatter over the internet or mobile phone or there would be far more extremist acts in the west.

There are over 700 Muslims in the UK on security watch,  people who would take on a Westminster Bridge style attack, that is drive a vehicle into a crowd of people and then hop out and stab as many people as they can, because its relatively easy.

25,000 known Islamic extremist who could pose a threat.

And the ISIS supporting militants can be distinguished from moderate Muslims by their fundamental attire, like the bloke in the vid all in white  and  women wearing the niqabs or burkas. They stand out like dog balls.

If such attire was banned then it sends a message to the militants that western secular society strongly rejects ISIS militancy. A militancy that is growing that large in Muslim countries it is making unsafe places to travel too.

The PC brigade years back who gave us the notions we need to hear the hate speech from Mullahs preaching to Muslims in their Mosques to show how the west is racist, they also gave excuses for Muslim youths forming rape gangs and fundamentalist terrorism is not Islam, its ok to have sharia law....people who  are now silent, onto a new cause.

With the Islamic militancy growing it can be seen the Muslim demographic are unable in taking charge of the militants, its the minority militants who are in charge of the majority, so it has to be western governments who to take charge.

One step in taking charge is to start banning fundamentalism practices or as in France where it was given free reign 60% of people in prison are Muslims, (from what I read and not allowed to provide a link) the young are embracing Jihad where as they should be embracing secular freedom.

While security watch  is excellent....it shouldn't have to be that way.