issuevoter wrote on Sep 20
th, 2018 at 9:16am:
Well, its a nice theory, but it is of necessity a personal one. I would not be able to advise anyone on this subject, but I do know that Happiness is rarely analysed by the unhappy. Likewise, few people have goals beyond the material. For me, it is not so much what you have, as what you do.
Yes each person must decide what will make them happy, it's very personal for sure
I did indeed analyze my own situation and found it wanting, there was far too much famine in my life, but to get into feast I needed to embark on the rejection/elimination process
It took planning, money and achievement of goals over a 15 year period.
The planning was based on "What would make me happy?" (I needed to get out of drudgery and stop bowing to other people most of the time)
The money was to come from honest full time work (some went into savings, some into Super)
The goals were based on sporadic things in life I'd already experienced that left me with a great deal of satisfaction and that warm inner glow feeling, but were all too often interrupted
In the final analysis, I needed to get out of the big city, have my own place, have no debt, be in picturesque surroundings, be able to carry on my hobbies uninterrupted, have a reliable vehicle, have friendly folk as neighbors but not too close, a bare minimum of traffic lights and cops, a minimum of government interference and a low to reasonable cost of living
This sounds like a lot but I actually achieved every one of those, I rejected my former life and made a new life based on what would make me happy - for the rest of my life
Your happiness is relevant to your place and people which arround you, that is society.