Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 14
th, 2018 at 10:22pm:
I suspect you have decided on a different definition of the word than the rest of the world.
When i wrote in the OP......
Quote:At some moment in time, i may choose to use my mind, to cause my hand [which itself is, another otherwise 'inanimate' object] to take hold of and to move a 'sitting' inanimate object.
note the '', surrounding.
I meant that, if my hand does not indeed move, if my hand fails to move, then for all intents and purposes,
my hand too, is also, becomes, another 'inanimate' object.
In the OP, i said, what i wanted to say, in the way i wanted to say it.
I was conveying an idea, a perception.
You choose to be argumentative.
....not for the sake of any understanding,
....but simply, to be, argumentative.
Because you oppose what i represent.
Therefore you choose to, not to agree, ...in order to oppose what i represent.