Good old Lees the liar:
Quote: Quote:DonDeeHippy wrote Today at 3:36pm:
Why do u feel compelled to answer monks stuff..... its not in environment ?
It is about the environment.
Any time I post about AGW Lees buttocks clench at faster than the speed of light and he needs to post crap to cover up my posts.
A classic is when I posted about a study using tide gauges showing sea level rise and he rushed in, nearly had a heart attack, did some searching, posted a paper by a different scientist who used satellite data and said that was the study I posted about and satellite data was useless. Showing poor old Lees is scared rigid at any mention of AGW.
If only Lees had bought and read the “Statistics for Dummies” book he used to “wave around.” Might have learned something but learning is not what Lees is about, denial is.
Ahahaha I once mentioned how you could test for warming: theory, null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. I mentioned Chi Square as a way of testing if temperature data by month or year was random or not. He just about had a heart attack!
He accepted the Harries and Feldman papers as showing AGW was real but not that long ago he was denying AGW to some member or other.
Some facts are downright nasty but a man looks unpleasant facts in the face and plans to cope with and adapt etc to the facts. That is how I see it anyway. Chamberlain dodged facts, Churchill didn’t and thank god for that or we would be speaking German or Japanese!