Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Send Topic Print
Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan (Read 28586 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #45 - Jul 20th, 2018 at 1:03pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:54pm:
cods wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 11:14am:
you seem to be under the impression NO MALE would ever stoop to wearing a veil...



Perhaps if I put it this way...

I've never once seen or heard of a male in Australia dressing up in an Islamic veil or burqa for sinister Islamic purposes. (though there was at least one occassion of Islamophobes wearing burkas in order to intimidate people who supported muslims). However I see women walking the streets in niqabs literally all the time.

Ahhh - but how do I know they are women eh?  Tongue


Exactly.

And, something cods won't address: how do we know who is wearing these?

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #46 - Jul 20th, 2018 at 1:07pm
 
This is the other "real" reason for the burqa. Her safety. The Muslim world is so male dominated that it's over sexualised. It's the same as a club for homosexual men. A horn fest. That's what happen when men run the show. A woman walking through downtown Syria in a miniskirt wouldn't last 5 minutes. She'd be cat  meat. That's why they instruct western women to were a hair covering in Muslim countries. Not so much about customs but her safety.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #47 - Jul 20th, 2018 at 1:25pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:54pm:
cods wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 11:14am:
you seem to be under the impression NO MALE would ever stoop to wearing a veil...



Perhaps if I put it this way...

I've never once seen or heard of a male in Australia dressing up in an Islamic veil or burqa for sinister Islamic purposes. (though there was at least one occassion of Islamophobes wearing burkas in order to intimidate people who supported muslims). However I see women walking the streets in niqabs literally all the time.

Ahhh - but how do I know they are women eh?  Tongue



you must get around a lot I also live in AC T  and have only ever seen one....it scared me...sorry but it does..

last week a women dressed in said garb refused to stand in Court... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  some obscure reason  she gave   thats insulting to our culture......and we know how muslims react if anyone insults their culture....

men do dress as women in Australia   gandalf....

and I am sure they dress as Muslim women as well.......... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

an even bigger thrill if they fool you... Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47352
At my desk.
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #48 - Jul 20th, 2018 at 7:03pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:44pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:17pm:
Quote:
2. insisting that a woman in a full face veil is every bit as intimidating and sinister as someone dressed in a ku klux klan outfit


Gandalf can you explain how I managed to say this without mentioning either women or veils?

Would it be fair to describe your post as a hysterical overreaction?


Thats clever FD. Who knew that when you said "They both cover the face Gandalf. They are both emblems of a political movement that uses violence to intimidate and silence people" - you weren't actually referring to the veil? Prey tell, what did you mean when you referred to something that covers the woman's face? Spongebob Squarepants perhaps?

And I would say that its fair to describe as 'hysterical overreaction' bringing up out of the blue the rhetorical question 'what is more of a threat to our freedom - Islam or the KKK' -  as some sort of counter-argument to the idea that the KKK outfit is more sinister and threatening than the veil.


What is clever is your ability to divine a statement about Muslim women wearing veils from two statements of mine, neither of which mention women or veils.

And I regularly point out that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy. I do so by comparing it to Nazism, the KKK and any other ideology of violent intolerance. If I say that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy, I mean that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy, not whatever hysterical misinterpretation you wish you could read into it.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92258
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #49 - Jul 20th, 2018 at 8:14pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 7:03pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:44pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 12:17pm:
Quote:
2. insisting that a woman in a full face veil is every bit as intimidating and sinister as someone dressed in a ku klux klan outfit


Gandalf can you explain how I managed to say this without mentioning either women or veils?

Would it be fair to describe your post as a hysterical overreaction?


Thats clever FD. Who knew that when you said "They both cover the face Gandalf. They are both emblems of a political movement that uses violence to intimidate and silence people" - you weren't actually referring to the veil? Prey tell, what did you mean when you referred to something that covers the woman's face? Spongebob Squarepants perhaps?

And I would say that its fair to describe as 'hysterical overreaction' bringing up out of the blue the rhetorical question 'what is more of a threat to our freedom - Islam or the KKK' -  as some sort of counter-argument to the idea that the KKK outfit is more sinister and threatening than the veil.


What is clever is your ability to divine a statement about Muslim women wearing veils from two statements of mine, neither of which mention women or veils.

And I regularly point out that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy. I do so by comparing it to Nazism, the KKK and any other ideology of violent intolerance. If I say that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy, I mean that Islam is the greatest modern threat to freedom and democracy, not whatever hysterical misinterpretation you wish you could read into it.


Are you Jewish?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #50 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:43pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 20th, 2018 at 7:03pm:
What is clever is your ability to divine a statement about Muslim women wearing veils from two statements of mine, neither of which mention women or veils.


Oh yes, very clever of me FD - to divine the drawing of a comparison between Islamic veils and the KKK hood from this:

"They both cover the face Gandalf."

How ever did I manage that?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Unforgiven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #51 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:47pm
 
...
Back to top
 

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #52 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm
 
At least Abbott could be identified.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Unforgiven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #53 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:50pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Unfortunately.
Back to top
 

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #54 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:50pm
 
Unforgiven wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Unfortunately.

It could be a man under the burqa and nobody would know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #55 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:52pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Why is that important to you?

That is, why do you need to know who every Muslim woman is?

Moreover, how can you identify them just by looking at their face?

Do you have a database of every single Muslim woman in the world?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #56 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:52pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:50pm:
Unforgiven wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:50pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Unfortunately.

It could be a man under the burqa and nobody would know.


Okay, let's assume it is.

And ... ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #57 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:54pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:52pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Why is that important to you?

That is, why do you need to know who every Muslim woman is?

Moreover, how can you identify them just by looking at their face?

Do you have a database of every single Muslim woman in the world?


A man could walk into a woman's toilet and have a bat under his burqa and nobody would know. There's definite avenues for sneakiness when you can't be identified.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131456
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #58 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:58pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:54pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:52pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Why is that important to you?

That is, why do you need to know who every Muslim woman is?

Moreover, how can you identify them just by looking at their face?

Do you have a database of every single Muslim woman in the world?


A man could walk into a woman's toilet and have a bat under his burqa and nobody would know. There's definite avenues for sneakiness when you can't be identified.


People wearing sporting mascot costumes can't be identified.

People wearing burns masks can't be identified.

People wearing fancy dress costumes can't be identified.

Are these people capable of entering toilets with bats, Homo?

I'm curious.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Veiled women more threatening than ku klux klan
Reply #59 - Jul 26th, 2018 at 3:53pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:58pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:54pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:52pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 26th, 2018 at 1:48pm:
At least Abbott could be identified.


Why is that important to you?

That is, why do you need to know who every Muslim woman is?

Moreover, how can you identify them just by looking at their face?

Do you have a database of every single Muslim woman in the world?


A man could walk into a woman's toilet and have a bat under his burqa and nobody would know. There's definite avenues for sneakiness when you can't be identified.


People wearing sporting mascot costumes can't be identified.

People wearing burns masks can't be identified.

People wearing fancy dress costumes can't be identified.

Are these people capable of entering toilets with bats, Homo?

I'm curious.


I meant masturbate Pecca.  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Send Topic Print